Posted on 08/18/2008 8:19:38 AM PDT by Hadean
RENO, Nevada (Reuters) - White House hopeful Barack Obama talked energy policy on Sunday with T. Boone Pickens, a billionaire oil investor who funded the "Swift Boat" attacks on Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry in 2004.
Pickens, a lifelong Republican, has endorsed neither his party's candidate, Arizona Sen. John McCain, nor Democrat Obama in the November 4 election and wants to make energy a top campaign issue.
He has advocated a plan to cut U.S. oil use by converting cars to run on natural gas.
Pickens funded efforts in 2004 by a group called Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, which sought to discredit Kerry's military service in Vietnam. The Massachusetts senator's initially tepid response to the attacks was partially blamed for his loss to President George W. Bush.
Obama brushed off Pickens' past at the start of a meeting the Texas energy tycoon requested on Sunday.
"You know, he's got a lot longer track record than that," the Illinois senator told reporters when asked how it felt to meet with someone who tore down his Democratic predecessor in 2004.
"He's a legendary entrepreneur and, you know, one of the things that I think we have to unify the country around is having an intelligent energy policy," Obama said.
Both Obama and McCain advocate increasing the use of wind, solar and other renewable energy sources to help curb U.S. dependence on foreign oil. Continued...
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Nope. It's asking questions. And when the salesmen say "you don't have to worry about that" then you really should worry.
I never said that Pickens was "stealing water."On my Post # 14, I mention that the plan includes "aquifer water rights." And that is indeed where a lot of this story is taking place behind the scenes -- who and what get to control the apportionment of aquifer water.
But I nowhere claim hysterically that "Pickens is stealing water!"
As I pointed out, there are laws that determine that. Mesa Water wasn't the only group. A second group formed up to do the same thing, though I haven't heard of them lately. San Antonio has pumped huge amounts from the Edwards Aquifer thru the years. When their usage was curtailed, a group of landowners to the west formed and started pumping their water to SA. Even the Texas Land Commissioner sells ground water from state lands.
There are some who say that Rule Of Capture is archaic and the state, instead of the local districts, should regulate the groundwater. But Home Rule in the State Constitution and political power of the combined water districts have prevented this.
Any way. On to the next.
You say, "confiscation of private property through eminent domain"
Actually, we are talking about an easement. No different from the easements that are used to get utilities to your house. If it bothers you, you should dis-connect from the grid
Some have complained that the lege made the changes that gave the Roberts County FWSD the right of easement. But these rights are granted all the time and everywhere.
Now, very recently, the PUC has approved the construction of two transmission lines from the windfarm to DFW and SA. Of course you understand that easements will be required for these two transmission lines? Are you OK with that?
So the issue of Pickens' transmission lines are probably moot. He can complain that the PUC lines delay the project for a year, but it makes his windpower cheaper.
That is because he also has his Wind/Natural Gas to sell.
I agree with him that Drilling is not the only thing we need to do to provide the energy requirements of this country. We need to expand our coal, nuclear as well as pursue our oil sands and oil shale.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.