Factcheck is bogus.
I was a skeptic at first but frankly Obama needs to answer the charges and frankly I couldn’t care less what factcheck thinks.
I agree. This whole birth certificate issue isn’t a detour worth taken.
Obama released a forged COLB. That is a fact. And so called “Fact Check” is full of BS.
I’m sure Barack’s birth certificate is *just* as genuine as the Chinese gymnast’s.
I have no problem in focusing on the presumptuous one, Hussein(peace on him) and his MARXIST philosophy.
He is not fit to serve in this country as dog catcher, much less as POTUS.
Factcheck appears to have a good case. However, I’d like to know if any of the “researchers” the produced this report once worked for 1) any of the networks or 2) any of the MSM. If the answer is yes for either, I withdraw my trust, since these clowns have repeatedly demonstrated their lack of talent, ability, and honesty.
While I think Obama should and will be defeated on an issues and character based campaign, the irony would be TOO sweet if he was disqualified over this.
In his first State Senate campaign in Illinois, he had all four of his opponents disqualified on signature challenges, including the woman who had paved the way for him to take her seat and introduced him to all the “right” people. (She was leaving her State Senate seat to move up to a Illinois congressional spot, but lost...she tried to get back into the race and was tossed out, Obama refused to step aside and had her signature list challenged...:)
So yeah, I agree with you on one level. But it would be lots of fun to see him say “But...but...but...” as it dawns on him he is going to be disqualified on a technical challenge. He had no problem at all doing it to others...
I can just hear the caterwauling now...:)
a.) This has already been posted ad nauseum, i.e. “search is your friend”
b.) ‘Factcheck.Org’ is about as objective about Obama as the Tobacco Institute is about lung cancer and cigarette smoking.
Happy to help.
Forget this. Let him run.
Why, if it had access to the original documents, didn’t Factcheck.org simply provide complete front-and-back high-res scans? Why only a single photograph of the front being held aloft at an angle, and why only excerpts of the seal and signature, which could have come from anywhere?
If Larry Sinclair isn't even considered a "smear", is this episode simply a quirky and exotic pit stop in Barry's Wild Ride to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue?
This is the same thing Jean Kerri did with his military records, when the Swift Boaters, more than a hundred honorable veterans, demanded that he should release his Form 180.
Instead, kerry provided SOME of his military records to two of his most trusted left-wing friends in the media, and lo and behold they said he was clean! Only trouble was, Kerry still refused to release his full records.
Same with Obama. Take note of the disclaimer at the foot of this web page: “Copyright © 2003 - 2008, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania
FactCheck.org’s staff, not the Annenberg Center, is responsible for this material.”
Walter Annenberg was an honorable man, as was pointed out on another thread, but many of the organizations he donated to have become tools of the left. Obama and his good friend Ayres the Pentagon bomber ran such a left wing organization at the U of Chicago, also an Annenberg outfit.
In other words, these are Obama’s left-wing associates, busy lying for their buddy. If there were any truth to this story, then why does Obama still refuse to release his birth certificate? These guys claim to have “seen” it. So, where is it? Why won’t Obama give permission for some trusted neutral party to approach the state of Hawaii and get the actual, certified documents?
This is nothing but a lying scam, unless Obama can PROVE otherwise. Repeating it and repeating it means nothing. Let’s see the Form 180. Let’s see the certified birth records. Let’s see the proof that Obama, an Indonesian citizen, filled out the papers to reclaim American citizenship.
Factcheck.org admits they have not seen the ORIGINAL birth certificate. What they have seen and touched is a modern era “short form” that was created many decades later.
They “never got an answer” from Hawaii why they cannot see the original long form birth certificate (they themselves did raise the distinction and “pose” the question).
Any thoughts? If this one isn't worth pursuing either, let's put them both to rest at once.
A clear conflict of interest.
1> FactCheck.org is a nonprofit website that describes its own goal as reducing the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. In its efforts, FactCheck claims to be nonpartisan. It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, and is funded primarily by the Annenberg Foundation.
2>Although the records of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge had been at the UIC library since 2002, the school denied requests to review them, saying the donor had not given ownership rights to UIC.
Friday, UIC said it had fulfilled the terms of the gift and plans to make the records available Tuesday. Obama was the first chairman of the group Ayers helped start.
Factcheck is bogus.
PLEASE, PLEASE TO EVERYONE..... almost a foolproof way to do a search BEFORE YOU POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A quick and dirty search of any and all of FreeRepublic thanks to Google ‘site:’ function.
No more excuses...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2057113/posts
Corsi: Well, what would be really helpful is if Senator Obama would release primary documents like his birth certificate.
Till then we have to speculate and ask why?