It is a bit sad that I have to repeat things that are already in the report.
Factcheck can’t have access to the original because Hawaii will never give it to anyone but a family member, as they stated.
The certificate is stamped and signed, and is compliant with the State Dept standards. In other words, it is no different than what you would get if you made the same request from the same state.
Factcheck is not left wing. This is the site that defended and was quoted by Dick Cheney when he was questioned about his deferred compensation from Halliburton four years ago. And it takes about 1 second to see articles they posted in which they are correcting things that Obama has said about McCain. An example here http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/distorting_mccains_remarks.html
I love the way that every time there is a new question of the document miraculously Obama provides and even more detailed version of it with all the necessary corrections made to disprove his detractors.
Still haven’t figured out a way to fix that messed up border yet, however I’m sure they are working on it even as we speak...
Factcheck.org is an Obama site, anything they say or print is highly suspect. The new COLB they exhibit is also suspect, due to the fact the first COLB they posted on the web has been proven fake. Obama is most likely NOT an American citizen no matter where he was born since he became an indonesian citizen when his family moved there which means his US citizenship was renounced. There are other reasons that he is not qualified or eligible for President and the lawsuit states them quite clearly. If all this is a lie then it will come out.
factcheck is with Annenberg, Obama is with Annenberg; got it?
Obama goes to Hawaii for a week in 2008, and suddenly another birth certificate shows up at “factcheck” with a 2007 date on it.
He’s dirty, book him!
My email to factcheck.org..
Your inspection of the document you claim to be Obama’s Birth Certificate does nothing to refute the detailed analysis performed by credentialed fraudulent document analyzer, “Techdude”.
Furthermore, the sloppiness of you analysis is revealed in your statement that it is a “Certification of Birth” (your quotes).
There is no such document.
Hawaii issues a document called a “Certification of Live Birth”.
That’s a FACT - you should CHECK it.
If you can’t even quote a title correctly, how can we have any faith in the rest of your analysis?
Brooks Jackson Director, Annenberg Political Fact Check
Brooks Jackson is a journalist who covered Washington and national politics for 34 years, reporting in turn for The Associated Press, the Wall Street Journal and CNN.
The link provided by pissant above has some good info. There seems to be enough irregularities to at least question it's authenticity, although it will probably be contained to the blogosphere.
That said, based on his performance so far I would prefer running against Barack Hussein than Hillary so let him run and let's enjoy the gaffes.
I continue to run into people on FR who post articles that have already been posted many, many times.
Location of birth - Honolulu
Somethings rotten in Denmark. Reckon he’s been there too.
This is, as predicted, straight out of the
Kerry SF180 playbook:
Just show the document to In-The-Tank media pals,
and not the general public.
Annenberg’s photography is even worse than the previous
junk. And the analysis of the previous has educated BHO’s
people, who have now had lots of time to build a better forgery.
This won’t get settled unless addressed in court, or
Hillary decides to use it as a weapon.
Hmmm...
Could be that one warehouse detention facility in Denver may be a bit small the next few dys....
This picture answers many of the questions about the original "proof", namely the lack of a Certificate Number and the raised seal. As a SWAG, the Certificate Number consists of a hospital id, the date, and a sequence number. Obviously the first image was edited by Photoshop to remove the certificate number, at the very least.
This seems to suggest that the state of Hawaii thinks he was born there. However "151" may mean "Born at Home", instead of a hospital, and 4 days is plenty of time to move him from Kenya (say) to the US after birth. This also does not answer questions about what his stay in Indonesia, and the fact that he might actually be a naturalized Indonesian citizen.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2067161/posts
“In Kenya, where Obama’s father is from, a second birth certificate for Obama was issued and registered with Kenya’s government. “
It is always important to be truthful.
The state of Hawaii apparently has determined he was born in Hawaii, to a mother who was an American citizen.
Unless the state of Hawaii is compelled to reverse its position through a legal proceeding, the matter is moot.
Birth records are not a federal matter and I can't see any federal court allowing a challenge to a birth certificate lawfully issued by a state.
I added the keyword CertifiGate. Also, this is about the 3rd time this article has been posted (with the same title).
Exactly. There's arguments of much more substance to be made against Obama.
Why aren't you writing posts about the "other issues?"
While you're pondering that answer, why did FactCheck say, in its Aug 26 update to this article, dated Aug 21, that "they did not learn anything about the 'security paper' that COLBs are printed on," when they were allegedly fondling OBama's real COLB six days earlier?