Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is the rebuttal YouTube video in regard to the "Lipstick on a pig" quote by Obama yesterday
YouTube ^ | September 10, 2008

Posted on 09/10/2008 6:01:48 AM PDT by IndianPrincessOK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: IndianPrincessOK

That was a stupid comment from Obama. I for one will give him the benefit of the doubt. Can anybody truly be this stupid to mean this comment in that way? If in the next few weeks he makes similar gaffes, then he would confirm that he is a pig himself. He would be done, and a lot of women would permanently find a home in the Republican party for the first time.


21 posted on 09/10/2008 6:20:19 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IndianPrincessOK

The rat idea for Sonny Perdue was brilliant!!! Can we have a man in a rat costume show up at Obama’s campaign stops???


22 posted on 09/10/2008 6:20:30 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Laura Ingraham on radio now is taking the opposite tack, saying we don’t need to go down that road, women know who they are, no response ads (I know, the campaign already has one out there), we’re better, stronger than that.

Yeah that’s probably right way to go. I just thought it would help reminding the Hillary voters (all 18 million) of what Hil expereinced running again Obama. I think we just got a lot more of them yesterday, for sure.


23 posted on 09/10/2008 6:20:34 AM PDT by IndianPrincessOK (McCain/Palin...2 pit bulls, one with lipstick! Pigs will fly with lipstick Nov. 4th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: IndianPrincessOK

Come on now guys. NObama is just treating women like the muslim that he is. Shouldn’t we celebrate diversity? sarc/off


24 posted on 09/10/2008 6:23:39 AM PDT by Tolkien (Grace is the Essence of the Gospel; Gratitude is the Essence of Ethics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IndianPrincessOK

The only thing I want to know is was that line in the speech notes or not, if it was then he knew exactly what he was saying, if it was an off the cuff remark then he can argue that everyone took it wrong.

No way would anyone with half a brain would write that and not intentionally smear Gov. Palin after she injected the lipstick phrase into her acceptance speech.

He just lost a chunk of women voters with that remark either way.


25 posted on 09/10/2008 6:24:03 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calvo

Look, you are correct about John McShamnesty. However, do you think that Barrack Obama will be any better on the immigration issue or worse?

Yes, he was wrong on the immigration issue, at least he admitted it and said that the American people don’t believe the politicians will secure the border. He now says he will work to secure the border then work on what to do with the illegal aliens here. Is he lying? Maybe, but at least we have a fighting chance with him. We know exactly what Obama is going to do.

I may not have voted for McCain if he had picked a snoozer like Romney. However, I feel like maybe, just maybe he will concentrate on doing the things I like about McCain (getting at government waste and being strong in the war on terror) and not the things I don’t like (McCain/Feingold, McCain/Kennedy).


26 posted on 09/10/2008 6:25:42 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: calvo
Yes, It's sleazy politics and I know that.....calling people stupid only makes you look childish.

Grow up the choices are as follows:

1) McCain/Palin

2) Obama/Biden

3)put your head in the sand and don't vote

Make your choice! I trust you know the ramifications of the choice you make so I won't need to educate you.

Good luck.

umbob

27 posted on 09/10/2008 6:28:29 AM PDT by thingumbob (McGenius-Palin beats Obomber-Hide'n and ( Dead terrorists don't make more terrorists!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IndianPrincessOK
What I don't understand is why he couldn't say “if you cover a wolf in wool, it's just a wolf in sheep's clothing” kind of comment. Then it would actually portray a more agreeable message with what the media has been saying thus able to boost his party more without any one able to claim sexism. Couldn't think of that one, could he. I don't know about claiming knowing about sexism since she's a tough woman and if everything before this didn't phase her, I doubt this would. Maybe standing up and claiming the “better person” role and not buy into it would infuriate the media? Either yours or mine sounds good.
28 posted on 09/10/2008 6:33:16 AM PDT by Vafud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vafud

What I don’t understand is why he couldn’t say “if you cover a wolf in wool, it’s just a wolf in sheep’s clothing” kind of comment. Then it would actually portray a more agreeable message with what the media has been saying ..

Both Obama AND Biden used lipstick quotes yesterday. It was deliberate, staged, planned, talking points. They are trying, obviously to cause a stir....and they got it! They will GET it in November, for sure, for sure!


29 posted on 09/10/2008 6:35:37 AM PDT by IndianPrincessOK (McCain/Palin...2 pit bulls, one with lipstick! Pigs will fly with lipstick Nov. 4th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I agree with Laura....keep running a positive campaign, that is what is doing it. Let Obama and Biden continue to attack this woman...their sexism will show one way or another.


30 posted on 09/10/2008 6:35:42 AM PDT by Blue Turtle (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Well said......I have to admit I might not have voted for McCain either if he would have picked anyone but someone with conservative credentials.

Capitolism in whatever form beats Communism in any form.

Better DEAD than RED

31 posted on 09/10/2008 6:40:32 AM PDT by thingumbob (McGenius-Palin beats Obomber-Hide'n and ( Dead terrorists don't make more terrorists!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

It’s not only sexist, it’s racist, too. “Pig” is used by blacks to denigrate whites, because of the pale-pink color of honkies’ skin.


32 posted on 09/10/2008 6:41:11 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I dunno. I saw Obama’s remarks, and if they were directed at Palin, it was subtle enough so that they could replay the lines and say: “Huh? Who, US? What are you talking about?” thereby making US seem like we’re over-reacting... which, in turn, would give them license to say just about anything they please, because they could then point to us and say: “See? There they do, over-reacting again...”

I think we should have just ignored it, taken the high road, and let the media replay it for the public. Women, in particular, are not going to like the sound of Obama saying that.


33 posted on 09/10/2008 6:46:04 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

“There they do...” above should be “There they go...” (but you KNEW that already :-)).


34 posted on 09/10/2008 6:47:00 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob
"Better DEAD than RED "

You got that right brother! It's funny how if you talk about communism today you appear out of date and strange. What do these people think happened to all the communists (here and abroad) when the Soviet Union fell? Do they think that they all got down on bended knee and thanked the Lord for deliverance? They're just going about their socialist agenda in a different manner. We had socialists during the cold war and socialists still exist today.

Remember when they used to depict the Democrats in red and the Republicans in blue? I think the rats didn't like that because it reminded people of who they really were. Notice how the Republicans have no problem being associated with the color red. That's because no one is going to confuse our party with being the party of socialists.
35 posted on 09/10/2008 6:48:57 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: IndianPrincessOK
I can't believe you people... look at Bush's new tone and how big of a disaster it has been. We need the Elliot Ness school of war... “they put one of ours in the hospital, we put two of their's in the morgue”.

We are at war... we are not playing a cricket match!

LLS

36 posted on 09/10/2008 6:53:59 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except for dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: calvo

I have watched the clip several times- if you notice Obama rubs his hand over his eye right before he says it- a real look of indecision. I think he had to think about taking the risk before saying it. That to me says he did mean for it to have a double meaning- the audience “got” what he meant, lib posters on the net “got” it too and they loved it. I do think he thought he could get away with it, he has done such things before and made it work. Part of the backlash is also what goes around comes around. Obama has called everyone that questioned him a racist and won’t allow people to use his middle name and other tactics- honestly that is just begging for things like this.

I don’t even think Republicans are the main force behind the huge backlash- I think women who already felt slighted by him- Hillary supporters and others are the ones that made a big deal out of this. They claim he has been sexist all along and that this is further proof. Honestly I didn’t even listen to the man when he was running against Hillary so I don’t know if they are right about his sexist treatment of Hillary or not.

This man has angered a lot of groups for someone that needs votes- he has angered Christians, gun owners, women, small town people, etc., etc. He is creating his own backlash by ticking off so many people.


37 posted on 09/10/2008 6:55:26 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
To think that THIS is who the rats chose as their leader.

They should have vetted him.

38 posted on 09/10/2008 6:57:06 AM PDT by syriacus (FIRST check out the Alaska state webpages. THEN tell me that governing Alaska is easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8
Honestly I didn’t even listen to the man when he was running against Hillary so I don’t know if they are right about his sexist treatment of Hillary or not.

Same here. My Liberal sister supported him at first, but was put off by the way Obama and the media demeaned her.

39 posted on 09/10/2008 6:59:17 AM PDT by syriacus (FIRST check out the Alaska state webpages. THEN tell me that governing Alaska is easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Good thing Sarah Palin isn’t Jewish

In a way it would be good if she were Jewish; then he'd be dumb enough to come up with an anti-semetic zinger and alienate some more voters.

40 posted on 09/10/2008 7:02:44 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson