Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did ABC "Cheat" In Palin Interview?
An observation from years of TV experience | MB26

Posted on 09/12/2008 9:02:59 PM PDT by MindBender26

Did ABC cheat in Palin interview? Perhaps.

It’s not unusual for news anchors to wear almost hidden earpieces during their live anchoring. It allows the producers to clandestinely talk to the anchors during the newscast and anchors to hear reporters in the field, receive time cues and other important audio. It’s not unusual to see anchors holding their earpiece a little tighter into their ear if they are having trouble hearing what is being fed and said to them.

But an earpiece during a supposedly one-on-one interview would be very unusual. Why would the interviewer need support from producers or others DURING the interview, unless they were all “ganging up” on the interview subject.

Tonight’s Gibson-Palin interview was billed as an exclusive one-on-one, but was it really Sarah Palin vs. Charlie Gibson aided by a lot of co-conspirator news producers sitting off-set, feeding him supposedly spontaneous questions and quips?

If you have a copy of the interview, watch what happens at 10:36 (EDT). Gibson is aggressively questioning Governor Palin, but his right hand is back near his ear, in a very unflattering pose. It’s a picture all of us who have worked in TV news are very familiar with. It’s an anchor having trouble hearing what’s being said to him in his earpiece.

Was Charlie being coached? If so, why, and why weren’t we told it was a one vs three or four attempted ambush, not one-on-one interview as it was advertised. If he wasn’t being coached by off-screen producers, then why the all too familiar “fingers in ear” pose.

This is all very much like the Steve Martin tent revival minister character in the movie “Leap Of Faith,” who received supposedly divine messages radioed into his ear from an off-stage Debra Winger. By the way, that movie was inspired by an actual fraudulent Texas TV minister who used the very same technique…. and was exposed on ABC’s 20/20… the same show Governor Palin was on tonight/

What’s the truth? We may never know. I’ll accept whatever Charlie Gibson tells us is the truth about this issue, but after an hour of demanding answers from Sarah Palin, don’t Mr. Gibson and ABC owe us an honest answer too?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; abcnews; charliegibson; chucklestheclown; democrats; dncmediamachine; dnctv; elections; enemedia; gibsonpalin; giibson; interview; liberalmedia; mccainpalin; mediabias; moralabsolutes; obamedia; partisanmedia; propagandawingofdnc; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
We shall see.
1 posted on 09/12/2008 9:02:59 PM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I have lost alot of respect for Charlie Gibson. If Gibson ever interviews Obama he better be pretty tough on him given the hachet job they tried to do on Palin. I was just watching a part of the Obama interview and Gibson sounded like an Obama campaign staffer. Just pathetic.


2 posted on 09/12/2008 9:06:06 PM PDT by fkabuckeyesrule (What does september mean to me? hockey pre-season. Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

He looked like a pompus A@@, earpiece or not.


3 posted on 09/12/2008 9:06:18 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Pathetic the way he treated her. My wife and I just watched “Back to School”, where Rodney Dangerfield gets grilled by college professors who are trying to kick him out. That’s what the Gibson interview reminded us both of.


4 posted on 09/12/2008 9:06:43 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (Obama will give us enough hope to hang ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Gibson’s primary problem is that it was obvious what ABC was trying to do... and Palin handled him very well.


5 posted on 09/12/2008 9:07:45 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Never kick a leftist when they are down. Wait until they are halfway back up. You get more leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I’ve never seen such a patronizing interview outside of maybe Oreilly.. He spoke in this quiet, creepy child molestor voice.


6 posted on 09/12/2008 9:07:50 PM PDT by MartinStyles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
What I noticed, was that Charlie and Sarah were unusually close together, almost knee to knee. It makes Charlie higher than her (superior to her)...distance being a leveling factor.

He appeared to be in her space...and they did a lot of close shots of her...Very intimidating, very sneaky, very lousy. But what's new with the media.

7 posted on 09/12/2008 9:08:21 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Personally, I thought they had more fun in the editing room than they did with any (alleged) earpiece. I couldn’t believe the hard cuts. They were very carefully not to cut her off mid sentence, but they would immediately cut her off after her sentence.


8 posted on 09/12/2008 9:09:02 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Lucky participant in 189 different Nigerian business deals......still waiting on payment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Interesting question. I can’t stand watching this kind of stuff, so I didn’t see it. But it should be asked.

I think Obama uses an ear plug. That’s why he stumbles and stutters when something goes wrong with the technology. No doubt it’s teleprompter trouble in the speeches, but when he’s answering audience questions, I think it’s the earplug.


9 posted on 09/12/2008 9:09:15 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
At least she has the guts to go on and be interviewed. What should be very evident is that when B.O. was on it was softball all the way. This was not the same with Sara and the American public can spot a ambush a mile off this will on harm the MSM.

does anyone have a list of questions that were asked B.O.? it would be interesting to compare the two interviews...

10 posted on 09/12/2008 9:09:42 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Psalm 83:1-8 is on the horizon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule

Gibson interviewed Obama in June. It was a very different interview.


11 posted on 09/12/2008 9:10:22 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (In VP's, McCain picked the future, Obama chose the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
Two Very Different Interviews (Charlie Gibson w/Obama vs. Charlie Gibson w/Palin)
12 posted on 09/12/2008 9:12:31 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (In VP's, McCain picked the future, Obama chose the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

If the phrase ‘mischaracterization run amok’ means anything, yes, ABC screwed the pooch, took a dump on a Lady, set their lipsticked lips squarely in the DNC nasty behind. The more than seven minute lie-filled pre-interview piece of assassination aimed at Governor Sarah Palin is the most blatant network effort to serve the sycophancy for one political candidate that I have ever witnessed in forty-plus years following politics. If ABC had any credibility before, they spent it all and went in the red tonight with their whoring spectacle to try and dstroy the Sarah Palin VP image. ABC used lies and partial facts to mischaracterize this LADY. Damn them. They are demonspwan in need of eradication.


13 posted on 09/12/2008 9:13:35 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinStyles
"He (Gibson) spoke in this quiet, creepy child molester voice."

I know I should be serious, but you made me burst out laughing.....and I'm STILL laughing!.

Leni

14 posted on 09/12/2008 9:13:58 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Stay Home Nov. to Vote for Obama-ization, More Regulation, Taxation, Litigation and Ginsburgization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I would have only agreed to a live, real-time interview if I was Palin. No edits. No earpieces. You know, like, reality TV (not).


15 posted on 09/12/2008 9:14:19 PM PDT by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Oh my, did I write that? ... Time for another double Magarita, obviously.


16 posted on 09/12/2008 9:14:27 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

WHO’S GOING TO CHECK OUT B.O. BEFORE THE DEBATES? I have no doubt he’ll be using a plug. No doubt whatsoever. He’s utterly lacking integrity and character...he’ll do anything to win.


17 posted on 09/12/2008 9:17:47 PM PDT by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I think you are correct. I also think Obama uses an IFB during some of his 'unscripted' speeches. ("Hold on one second. I can't hear myself.") [EXACT WORDS]

The IFB is a special intercom circuit that consists of a program feed sent to an earpiece worn by talent via a wire, telephone, or radio receiver (audio that is being "fed back" to talent) that can be interrupted and replaced by a television producer's or director's intercom microphone. On a television news program for example, a producer can talk to the news anchors, to tell them when they are live on the air and when to begin reading off the script on the teleprompter or cue cards.


18 posted on 09/12/2008 9:19:18 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

19 posted on 09/12/2008 9:20:04 PM PDT by workerbee (Sarah Palin's very existence is a threat to the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I have it paused at precisely 10:36.

Camera is behind his head. He tells her time is running out so here comes some social issues.

When it swaps to the camera from behind her head, he has his right hand up to his right ear/jaw area. It appears his pinky is bent against his cheek. His thumb is against his cheek. They are forming a circle almost. And the other three fingers are extended straight and appear to be going inside his ear at an angle across his cheek.

It just looks weird. Almost like he is holding his ear and jaw to his head.


20 posted on 09/12/2008 9:25:07 PM PDT by cpanter (Babies, guns and Jesus. Hot Damn! - Rush on the Palin pick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson