Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA TRIED TO STALL GIS' IRAQ WITHDRAWAL [election is over?]
New York Post ^ | 09/15/08 | AMIR TAHERI

Posted on 09/15/2008 2:03:51 AM PDT by Enchante

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 681-687 next last
To: Enchante

The media, of course, will try to bury this but this is something the McCain should amplify and expand on.

The McCain campaign is being accused by the Obama campaign of avoiding the issues.

Ok. Here’s an issue. Don’t duck this, Senator McCain. Bring this issue front and center.


101 posted on 09/15/2008 3:59:52 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

“” He’s got absolutely no clue about the separation of the executive and legislative branches, and which one is actually the commander-in-chief.”””

Yet he taught Constitutional Law to our finest upcoming lawyers at the U. of Chicago? go and figure.


102 posted on 09/15/2008 4:00:10 AM PDT by Gemsbok (CIC means Commmander in Chief,....NOT CommunityOrganizer in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; PhilDragoo

I’m not surprised that it sounds like the Hostage Crises since some of the same people are involved.


103 posted on 09/15/2008 4:02:00 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

It should hurt but who will know?


104 posted on 09/15/2008 4:03:37 AM PDT by blueyon (Every one should get their 15 mins under the bus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Hugh & Series!

News reporter needs to get Iraqi PM testimony on tape and make it into a political ad very quickly.


105 posted on 09/15/2008 4:04:26 AM PDT by Gemsbok (CIC means Commmander in Chief,....NOT CommunityOrganizer in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

It’s on Drudge too now...


106 posted on 09/15/2008 4:05:30 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

It depends on where and if this shows up on TV news. The problem today is that there is huge financial news and that will drown out a lot.


107 posted on 09/15/2008 4:07:20 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

That last is an extraordinarily low bar, and I hope you are correct in your overall assessment.


108 posted on 09/15/2008 4:07:30 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Obama: Carter's only chance to avoid going down in history as the worst U.S. president ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
We never can get the Dems on any outrageous acts....reason, our own side always calls it preposterous.

People like that deserve to lose. And will be left as a footnote to humanity.

109 posted on 09/15/2008 4:07:39 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Socialism makes you feel better about oppressing people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nw_arizona_granny; Beckwith; Candor7; AliVeritas; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv
thanks granny!

Barack Obama tours Iraq with Gen. David Petraeus in July, when he sought to stall any agreement for US troop withdrawal until President Bush left office.

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.

110 posted on 09/15/2008 4:08:12 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I don’t expect to hear about it any place but here. I bet even Fox ignores it. But we will hear about Tina Fey for several days.


111 posted on 09/15/2008 4:11:31 AM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

A Logan Act violation? I indict the entire DemocRAT Party for treason.


112 posted on 09/15/2008 4:11:39 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (don't worry, they only want to take water out of the other guy's side of the bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Maliki's advisers have persuaded him that Obama will win - but the prime minister worries about the senator's "political debt to the anti-war lobby" - which is determined to transform Iraq into a disaster to prove that toppling Saddam Hussein was "the biggest strategic blunder in US history."

Maybe because of this concern the Iraqi's might leak out information regarding Auchi, Rezko, Obama and Oil for Food corruption.

"Auchi's General Mediterranean Holdings company was also the largest private shareholder in Banque Nationale de Paris which later merged with Paribas to become BNP Paribas. At Saddam's insistence, billions of dollars of Oil for Food transactions passed through BNP from its 1995 inception until 2001.", http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/obamas_iraqi_oil_for_food_conn.html

Auchi involved in Saddam's Oil for Food corruption -> loans 3.5 million to broke Rezko -> Rezko's wife buys an inaccessible plot next to Obama's mansion for $650000 valued later at $240000, on the same day as Obama pays $300000 below asking price for his mansion -> Obama against the Iraq War which stopped the Oil for Food corruption.
113 posted on 09/15/2008 4:15:23 AM PDT by igoramus08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

that SOB. Trying to pull of a withdrawal on his own watch...for nothing more than personal gain. This clown will never be fit for office...this goes way beyond character flaws, of which he has many. This is downright criminal.


114 posted on 09/15/2008 4:15:43 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
So let me get this straight. The commies of Dems left are hanging posters outside their houses that read “Support the Troops. End the War.” trying to deceive the American public into thinking that they want to end the war for some patriotic love of our soldiers.

THEY choose Hussein Obama because of his anti-war stance.

But HE (and they by association) actually want to extend the war (kill more soldiers according to their argument) until after the election because they consider it a good issue politically.

So, the leftist Dems and Hussein Obama are willing to kill US soldiers if it helps put Hussein Obama in the White House.

Have I got that straight?

Well, I guess that's about par for their course.

115 posted on 09/15/2008 4:16:07 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (If Hillary is elected, her legacy will be telling the American people: Better put some ice on that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Bump


116 posted on 09/15/2008 4:16:30 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Poor little Obambi needs to worry that the whole thing isn't on tape. It might be a "he said, he said" right now but a denial rather than an explanation, however lame, will explode when the tape is released.

It all fits, remembering that the RATs project their actions onto others. This is what they accused Reagan of doing with Iran and the Carter hostages. Must be on page 15 of the RAT playbook.

117 posted on 09/15/2008 4:17:45 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (don't worry, they only want to take water out of the other guy's side of the bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
"A Logan Act violation? I indict the entire DemocRAT Party for treason."

That's a joke...we have terrorists teaching our kids.

Count down to the first Republican who says this is too outrageous to be believable...3..2...1.... It's too outrageous...repeat after me...it's too outrageous to be reliable. Now move on little sheeple.

118 posted on 09/15/2008 4:19:04 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Socialism makes you feel better about oppressing people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
But HE (and they by association) actually want to extend the war (kill more soldiers according to their argument) until after the election because they consider it a good issue politically.

So, the leftist Dems and Hussein Obama are willing to kill US soldiers if it helps put Hussein Obama in the White House.


Plus he voted against Body Armour, helicopters, ammunition and aircraft, and for funding veterans' medical facilities and rehabilitation programs in Iraq.
119 posted on 09/15/2008 4:22:41 AM PDT by igoramus08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: All

I have been looking for additional sources on this and not finding a whole lot. Anyone else having an luck?


120 posted on 09/15/2008 4:22:47 AM PDT by j_k_l
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 681-687 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson