Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mother is denied pill by Muslim pharmacist
Telegraph.co.uk ^ | 03 Oct 2008 | Paul Stokes

Posted on 10/05/2008 12:12:12 PM PDT by forkinsocket

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

Comment #162 Removed by Moderator

Comment #163 Removed by Moderator

Comment #164 Removed by Moderator

Comment #165 Removed by Moderator

Comment #166 Removed by Moderator

To: JMack

“You have a good point about the store owner being free to hire another Pharmacist, but he is still volunteering to provide a government regulated product under license from the gov’t. If the Gov’t didn’t restrict drugs, and allowed them to be sold like food, I would actually agree with you.”

Practically everything is regulated by govt. The baby crib, the toothpaste imported from China, the irradiated lettuce. What you’re doing is introducing a loophole to bring on even more govt involvement that would affect every single store.

Forget about abortion for now. If that pharmacist refused to sell some other pill like an aspirin, is that really a concern of govt? Just go to another pharmacy or complain to the owner!


167 posted on 10/05/2008 9:34:21 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: cacoethes_resipisco

I don’t oppose contraceptives, not at all.

I oppose the pill, which is in fact an abortifacient.

I believe that anything that kills an implanted embryo is an abortionm and I am pro-life.

Ed


168 posted on 10/05/2008 9:55:19 PM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Comment #169 Removed by Moderator

To: JMack

If you’re going to use a rhetorical arguments, you have to have something that makes sense. I can’t even imagine a scenario like the one your postulate, so if you hope to win this debate with anyone, find something else (I’m just trying to be helpful).
If you think a baby (fetus of course is the term used to dehumanize) is simply a burden (much like a parasite) there’s nothing I can say that will dissuade you. If you think single teens who have babies are saints, I have to wonder what your definition of saint is (since you’re not using the church’s definition, I think we can both agree!)
Lastly, dogs. Well, I happen to be heavily involved in dogs (not german shepherds, altho we had one when I was growing up, and yes, she was a great family member). I have trained, I have raised, and I understand that dogs can even seem like people. But, I know the difference. BTW they are NOT totally selfless. They just see us as their boss and their nature is to please us because that’s what their instincts tell them to do. Dogs are dogs, no matter how much we love them. What you call a fetus is a person.


170 posted on 10/06/2008 7:16:57 AM PDT by brytlea (Obama--Keep the change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

lol, if bitterly so


171 posted on 10/06/2008 7:18:47 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JMack

We are more than the product of our environment and upbringing.


172 posted on 10/06/2008 8:52:38 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: JMack
You were arguing on behalf of killing the innocent and helpless. I merely recommended the same debating strategy to you.

Now, be about your business.

173 posted on 10/06/2008 8:54:40 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; JMack

Those who wish death on others cannot relate to their intended victims. Even when you describe them being in exactly the same situation as their intended victims, they can’t see any similarities. They fully expect to be exempt from their own policies, and can see no contradiction in that. It’s pointless to try to explain it to them. They’re incapable of understanding.


174 posted on 10/06/2008 11:34:44 AM PDT by BykrBayb (May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Well, that’s true of course. They’re in predator mode (eating babies and the elderly) and simply cannot get back into human mode.


175 posted on 10/06/2008 11:45:37 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

Comment #176 Removed by Moderator

To: ari-freedom
ok but you can’t force someone to push a pill that would kill a baby

I agree. He took the job as pharmacist voluntarily.
177 posted on 10/07/2008 11:38:16 PM PDT by aNYCguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cacoethes_resipisco
It works in exactly the same way as any other contraceptive, that is: "primarily by stopping the release of an egg from the ovary (ovulation). It may prevent the union of sperm and egg (fertilization). If fertilization does occur, Plan B may prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the womb (implantation)."

Can you see how Plan B is not *exactly* the same?

178 posted on 11/02/2008 1:32:22 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson