Posted on 10/17/2008 3:24:59 PM PDT by nickcarraway
The first reports of the successful reprogramming of adult human cells back into so-called induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, which by all appearances looked and acted liked embryonic stem cells created a media stir. But the process was woefully inefficient: Only one out of 10,000 cells could be persuaded to turn back the clock.
Now, a team of researchers led by Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, succeeded in boosting the reprogramming efficiency more than 100fold, while cutting the time it takes in half. In fact, they repeatedly generated iPS cells from the tiny number of keratinocytes attached to a single hair plucked from a human scalp.
Their method, published ahead of print in the Oct. 17, 2008 online edition of Nature Biotechnology, not only provides a practical and simple alternative for the generation of patient- and disease-specific stem cells, which had been hampered by the low efficiency of the reprogramming process, but also spares patients invasive procedures to collect suitable starting material, since the process only requires a single human hair.
"Having a very efficient and practical way of generating patient-specific stem cells, which unlike human embryonic stem cells, wouldn't be rejected by the patient's immune system after transplantation brings us a step closer to the clinical application of stem cell therapy," says Belmonte, PhD., a professor in the Gene Expression Laboratory and director of the Center of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona, Spain.
Keratinocytes form the uppermost layer of skin and produce keratin, a tough protein that is the primary constituent of hair, nails and skin. They originate in the basal layer of the epidermis, from where they move up through the different layers of the epidermis and are eventually shed.
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...
Sounds good!
How does it feel to have been used by politicians to make fools of the electorate?
Now they only have to figure out how to make them work at something useful like repairing nerve damage, regrowing burned skin, etc. Sometimes science gets bogged down in the process and execution and loses sight of all of the many possible alternatives that might lead to the solution they originally sought. It’s called ‘out of the box thinking.’
If this research provides a valid reason for not killing unborn babies, it will be dismissed as junk science.
Like growing hair?
Salk is a top-notch institution, and hopefully little chance of that.
Love hearing of these advances. Thanks!
Had congress approved the fetal stem-cell research, would this other research have been done at all?
Ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.