Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA has 'anti-gun' Obama in its sights
orlandosentinel.com ^ | October 19, 2008 | Cox News Service

Posted on 10/20/2008 10:12:13 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: StAntKnee
"People know these things in their hearts. They can’t pull the lever for the guy. They just won’t be able to. "

What is your "Plan B"

21 posted on 10/20/2008 11:52:50 AM PDT by An Old Man ("The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress." Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Ok, you got me, but there is no physical difference between apostrophes and single quotation marks. The fact they have different names does not detract from the fact that the identical mark is used in each situation.

Thank you for conducting the research, neverdem.

22 posted on 10/20/2008 11:54:04 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly ("Democrats: Seeking an easy life at someone else's expense for 150 years")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Saab-driving Yuppie

$40 million is what the NRA is spending. $40 m from the NRA is worth $100 million versus other groups.

You guys need to understand the NRA. You will not see an ad on Monday Night Football. Maybe the outdoor channel or that gun channel or Speed TV. They are very good at (pardon the pun) targeting their ads. They are talking to their base of 4 million members and probably another 2 to 4 million expired members like me (I will renew). I already got a direct mail piece. Even as an expired member - I will read every word.

Gun owners, NRA or former NRA members are a different breed. If the NRA says something - gun owners can take it to the bank. They don’t just endorse anyone. They have loved Sarah for years - she has been in their mags.

If you have union guy who is an NRA member - if the union says vote Obama and the NRA says McCain then McCain in almost all cases wins.

Since 1980 - every Pres candidate the NRA endorsed (Repub) won. Reagan twice, Bush 1 once (they did not do it second time due to Brady Bill), withheld Dole because of Brady Bill, supported Bush 2nd twice.


23 posted on 10/20/2008 11:56:23 AM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner; Saab-driving Yuppie; All
Doesn’t $10 million seem kind of low for the NRA to be spending on ads as compared to 2000 and 2004?

They spent $20 million against Kerry according to one story that I just came across using the keyword nationalrifleassn. I was looking for the story that I thought I read that they expect to spend at least $18 million against Obama. Remember that the economy isn't so hot.

24 posted on 10/20/2008 11:59:06 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

I’ve been through the Carter years (in the military, by they way, where we all felt the disgrace of his being the CINC)

I’ve been through the Clinton years, where . . . well, you know.

I can gut it out for four years, I guess. If I have to. The peeps will see some really frightening things through their newly opened eyes.

As they loved to say on the Sopranos: Whaddyagunnado?


25 posted on 10/20/2008 11:59:25 AM PDT by StAntKnee (Why'dja say I was a community organizer? You know how I always wanted to pretend I was a soldier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EnigmaticAnomaly
Thank you for conducting the research, neverdem.

You're welcome. I knew it had a name. I was thinking semi-quotation marks. It was bugging me. Obama is extra, extra antigun without any marks or qualifications.

26 posted on 10/20/2008 12:08:41 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24
They will raise fees on licensing gun shop owners to 10,000 dollars or more to get rid of gun sellers, taxes on gun makers, 500% taxes on ammo, and those are just a few of the small ways to get rid of guns quietly.
27 posted on 10/20/2008 12:31:49 PM PDT by lucky american (We cannot direct the wind but we can adjust the sails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
What's the proper name for those quotation marks within quotation marks?

I think you're talking about "scare quotes". Per Wikipedia: Scare quotes is a general term for quotation marks used for purposes other than to identify a direct quotation.

Generally, if quotes are used within quotes, then the single quote would be used. Sometimes the single quotes are used even if they are not within double quotes. Depends upon the style. (I tend to use single quotes quite often, to sorta indicate that the words are not actually "quoted".)

You can look up the LameStreamMedia style books, if you want to find their take on it, but they certainly aren't the definitive word on punctuation, grammar or anything else in the English language, since they bend anything any way they feel they want to. Remember Mark Twain's comments:

...That awful power, the public opinion of a nation, is created in America by a horde of ignorant, self-complacent simpletons who failed at ditchdigging and shoemaking and fetched up in journalism on their way to the poorhouse."
--Mark Twain, License of the Press, A Talk Before the Monday Evening Club, Hartford, 1873.

although I feel he went too lightly and was much too politically correct in that thought on them. Then again, he did say:

"If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed."
--Mark Twain (1835-1910)

Even during the civil war, the military weren't particularly enamored of them either:

"I hate newspapermen. They come into camp and pick up their camp rumors and print them as facts. I regard them as spies, which, in truth, they are. If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast."
--Civil War General William Tecumseh Sherman

Of course, ol' Thomas didn't think highly of them in his time, either:

"Advertisements contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper."
--Thomas Jefferson to Nathaniel Macon, 1819

Then there's a somewhat more contemporary view:

"The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth."
--Winston Churchill

28 posted on 10/20/2008 5:16:26 PM PDT by hadit2here ("Most men would rather die than think. Many do." - Bertrand Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadit2here

Thank you.


29 posted on 10/20/2008 5:31:19 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson