Skip to comments.Orson Scott Card: Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights? (Devastating)
Posted on 10/20/2008 10:29:44 AM PDT by quesney
Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights? By Orson Scott Card
Editor's note: Orson Scott Card is a Democrat and a newspaper columnist, and in this opinion piece he takes on both while lamenting the current state of journalism.
An open letter to the local daily paper almost every local daily paper in America:
I remember reading All the President's Men and thinking: That's journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.
This housing crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.
It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.
What is a risky loan? It's a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.
The goal of this rule change was to help the poor which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can't repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can't make the payments, they lose the house along with their credit rating.
They end up worse off than before.
This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.
Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It's as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)
Isn't there a story here? Doesn't journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren't you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?
I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. "Housing-gate," no doubt. Or "Fannie-gate."
Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.
As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay entitled "Do Facts Matter?" ( http://snipurl.com/457townhall_com] ): "Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago. So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President. So did Bush's Secretary of the Treasury."
These are facts. This financial crisis was completely preventable. The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was ... the Democratic Party. The party that tried to prevent it was ... the Republican Party.
Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie. Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout!
What? It's not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame?
Now let's follow the money ... right to the presidential candidate who is the number-two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae.
And after Freddie Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate's campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing.
If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was.
But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an "adviser" to the Obama campaign because that campaign had sought his advice you actually let Obama's people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn't listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign.
You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican.
If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish, and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama.
If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.
There are precedents. Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link. (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.)
If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.
Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That's what you claim you do, when you accept people's money to buy or subscribe to your paper.
But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad even bad weather on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to.
If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.
Because that's what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don't like the probable consequences. That's what honesty means . That's how trust is earned.
Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing.
Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter while you ignored the story of John Edwards's own adultery for many months.
So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all? Do you even know what honesty means?
Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for?
You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women. Who listens to NOW anymore? We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles.
That's where you are right now.
It's not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.
If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices.
Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation's prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama's door.
You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a Senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis. You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way.
This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion.
If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe and vote as if President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie.
If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats including Barack Obama and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans then you are not journalists by any standard.
You're just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it's time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.
This article first appeared in The Rhinoceros Times of Greensboro, North Carolina, and is used here by permission.
“I remember reading All the President’s Men and thinking: That’s journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.”
They had “the truth” laid in their laps by a government snitch, and they STILL couldn’t discover what the break-in was all about. If that’s the pinacle of journalism, what good is journalism?
The lights have been out in the MSM for quite some time now.........
These people went into journalism with an agenda.
They want to “change” the world and get paid for it.
Thanks for posting. PING!
All journalists are required to take a Hypocritic oath.
It is a secret oath but one can guess how it goes...
But I fear that it’s too late for the msm. They have already sold their souls to the devil.
And this only scratches the surface. Well said! Bravo!
Don’t hold your breath waiting for this to appear in the MSM.
Thanks for posting!
I’m a big fan of Orson Scott Card and have read most of his books. I had no idea he was a Democrat because he seemed so adult.
Awesome. Thanks for posting.
the media have been truly disgusting in the way they have been promoting obama and covering up obama’s connections, dealings and actions.
There is so much to look at from ODINGA, to TX money going to Kenya, to ACORN, to his I will never use nuclear weapons
the list is endless and yet yo the media have not done your job, you have not been anything but a mouth piece for obama and is it any wonder if you are walking down a street and someone lets you have it in public.
It will happen so don’t be surprised when it does, I know if I ever get to see you so called journo’s then I will let my feelings be known to you
B U M P !!
America has been misinformed BIG TIME!
Incredible writing. Should be nominated for post of the month.
Orson Scott Card alert
A free press left unchecked leads to all sorts of interesting outcomes. Much like unrestrained capitalism where greed and shortsightedness create bubbles and destruction.
In this case the media has done tremendous damage to our country by slanting the truth about Iraq, the true cause of the housing and financial mess and a host of other issues all so the democrats would gain political favor.
And not they want to talk about reintroducing the fairness doctrine. Well, maybe they should and that would mean that television stations would be forced to carry rebuttals from opposing voices. I can see a situation in CBS where at the end of a Couric broadcast that someone would start off with, “Katie, you ignorant slut...”
Somebody needs to get McCain (or better yet Palin) in front of a teleprompter to read this article — every word.
An accurate portrayal of the MSM. Sadly, they are too far gone to care.
“America has been misinformed BIG TIME!”
Unfortunately, the script has already been written for this one. Obama elected with the complicity of the MSM. Obama fails miserably, screws up one thing after another, and America is hurting.
The sheeple will look for answers, and the MSM will come to the rescue, it’s all Bush’s fault. That’s right, no matter what happens, or what Obama does, the MSM will say it is the direct result of failed Bush policies.
The sheeple will buy it. In Obama’s 2nd term, people will begin to question things, but it will be too late by then.
Bump, bump, bump!
Pass this around to everyone!
Now there we are! See, Mr Card is a professed democrat doing what he believes is right and telling the truth, like he’s encouraging the other journalists to do! Excellent.
If the author had any sense, he would abandon his ‘Rat leanings forever.
What the past eight years of 'journalism' has proven is, 'journalists' have no honor, only their pride of sycophancy. Democrats are liars. They can succeed daily with lying continuously BECAUSE the media admire thier ability to fabricate the lies. The lies would be powerless if the vacuous 'journalists' were to just point them out. But these anti-American bastards can't even do that as trhey seek to usher in Marxism. ... It's almost huntin' season don'tchaknow.
He’s not a typical Democrat of today, he’s a Zell Miller Democrat. Except for being pro gun control he seems very conservative to me.
Awful dark in here.
what a racist this guy must be
IF she were to be scheduled to make a fifteen minute address, the media networks would be falling all over themselves for the viewership. She could then explain just how pernicious is the democrat fault in the current financial crisis and which political party tried to do something to prevent the current meltdown and which party worked, actually worked hard, with filibusters and insults spewed in committees at the very regulators whose job it was to blow the whistles, to keep the destruction on track for democrat party empowerment.
Of course, Governor Palin could not dare close her address with a clear example of how democrats have used destruction as a means to empower their polical capital--yes, democrats have exploited the abortion holocaust, even furthering the destruction of alive unborn lives--but I can dream don'tchaknow.
That is UPROARIOUS!!
You have my resounding nomination for "Tagline of the Year".
I agree. Devastating.
Orson Scott Card may be a columnist and a Democrat...but others know him as the author of a couple of the greatest sci fi novels of all time...including Ender’s Game.
He is that most rare, and mythical of creatures, a rational Democrat.
OK...NOW I’ll buy his books !
B to the U to the M to the P
About five years ago a newspaperman polled local (AZ) Journalism students as to whether they thought their job was to just report the facts or to shape public opinion. Over half said it was the latter. It's probably about 90% now (there are still a few good ones left but they are a dying breed).
Media outlets owned by conservatives would be frozen out by all sources on the left, including every source connected to the Democrat party. They would quickly be attacked as "right-wing propaganda" sources, and would go out of business. They would be forced out of business by standard, traditional liberal MSM organizations.
This phenomenon is, I believe, a form of something called "the tragedy of the commons," which, according to Wikipedia, is defined as follows:
"...a dilemma in which multiple individuals acting independently in their own self-interest can ultimately destroy a shared resource even where it is clear that it is not in anyone's long term interest for this to happen."
The problem is with the business model under which the traditional media operates in our society. This model is under great stress, and will have to change radically in order to survive. Unless it can be rescued by the power of government, which is what Obama is going to try do do.
Keep on dreaming, it's worth the chuckle.....then who knows, could happen.
By “The One’s” 2nd term there will no longer BE anyone questioning his policies or priorities.
Wasn’t the true reason that the Watergate breakin occurred was that John Dean wanted to remove comprimising information about his wife’s activities as the Heidi Fleiss of Washington? I vaguely remember Gordon Liddy going ballistic about this when it was finally revealed in the early ‘90s.
OSC bump and bookmark for later reading.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.