Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it time to scrap the Electoral College?
pMSNBC/MSN ^ | 10/21/08 | Tom Curry

Posted on 10/21/2008 11:14:49 AM PDT by AT7Saluki

...The system is a relic of the early days of the republic when electors were supposed to be independent agents exercising their judgment in choosing a presidential candidate from a list of several contenders.

Today, electors are party loyalists who almost always vote for their party’s nominee.

On Friday, a group of legal scholars, political scientists, and systems specialists gathered at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for a conference on the Electoral College. Their focus? How to better engineer the system...

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: election; electoral; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: frankiep

I feel constrained to point out that there is no such thing as the “national popular vote”.


41 posted on 10/21/2008 11:27:29 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
Why just get rid of the electoral college? Why not put the whole damn Constitution out of its misery and just elect a king to spread the wealth by popular vote, based on who has the dreamiest eyes?

In fact, why even bother with the popular vote? Maybe we should just have the UN General Assembly appoint a committee of international journalists and college professors to pick the new monarch?

42 posted on 10/21/2008 11:27:32 AM PDT by Maceman (If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

Any state that does that effectively takes itself out of the selection process and gives up its power.

There is no way the left could get an amendment passed, too many states would have to vote against their own interests.

However, there’s always the Supreme Court - they could just “interpret” the EC out of the Constitution.


43 posted on 10/21/2008 11:28:40 AM PDT by MrB (0bama supporters: What's the attraction? The Marxism or the Infanticide?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

Not just no, but hell no!


44 posted on 10/21/2008 11:29:40 AM PDT by Ingtar (Go Palin! And the white-haired guy too, I suppose. '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

45 posted on 10/21/2008 11:29:43 AM PDT by frogjerk (PalinÂ’s record is on the record, while whole years of ObamaÂ’s life are engulfed in fog - T. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

Our Electoral College system is part of our republican form of representative government. Its one aspect of our Republic that makes the USA different from a pure democracy.

Liberals and socialists want to move America towards pure democracy and mob rule. NO THANKS!


46 posted on 10/21/2008 11:30:03 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Please reread my post. I said that some states have promised to award their Electoral votes to the candidate that receives the most votes nationally regardless of whether or not that candidate received the most votes in that state.


47 posted on 10/21/2008 11:30:31 AM PDT by frankiep (Every socialist is a disguised dictator - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

This will never happen. The states would have to ratify a change to the constitution. The small states will NEVER let this happen. And they shouldnt. If the states are so hot to change, they should simply change the state’s rule on how the votes are assessed.


48 posted on 10/21/2008 11:30:35 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
The Electoral College isn't perfect, but it certainly helps smooth out the problems in the current state-by-state voting.

The only way I would ever consider removing the EC is if a national election were handled by use of Instant Runoff Voting, and ballots were designed with a Robson Rotation method...but I don't see that ever happening.
49 posted on 10/21/2008 11:30:44 AM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
NO
50 posted on 10/21/2008 11:31:13 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

The Founding Fathers were very wise in creating the Electoral College as it gives certainty to the presidential election process. Imagine a close national election, perhaps one rife with voter fraud, the election of the President could be hung up in the courts for months if not years arguing about hanging chads etc. The odds that electors will not vote as directed by the popular election outcome in their state is not real issue. Some times the Electoral College, like in the 2000 election will elect a President who did not necessarily win the national popular vote, but since that is not our system it is also a non issue.


51 posted on 10/21/2008 11:31:16 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

that isn’t true. In 2004 Bush got more votes than John Kerry. In 1984 Reagan didn’t need the electoral college to defeat Walter Mondale.


52 posted on 10/21/2008 11:31:47 AM PDT by ChurtleDawg (voting only encourages them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
"The system is a relic of the early days of the republic.."

Kind of the same way they think of the 2nd Amendment.

53 posted on 10/21/2008 11:32:47 AM PDT by Jaxter (Everything I needed to know about Obama I learned by Googling "Black Liberation Theology".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

They know that regardless of their polls, McCain still has an advantage in the electoral college. McCain can lose two Bush states..New Mexico, and Iowa, and still have 274 against Obama’s 264. Obama is in the position of trying to pluck VA or CO to win...they are traditionally RED states. Very difficult to do, no matter what Rasmussen and Gallup says.


54 posted on 10/21/2008 11:33:53 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

Drive By Media hit squad.

If we counted the “popular vote” alone, we’d still be recounting the 2000 tally county by county, looking for irregularities.

The difference between Al Gore and George W. Bush was 0.51% (just over half of one percent) of the vote.

On the other hand, there would have been no “problems” in Ohio.

The media is worried sick the Obambi is going to lose the battleground states. Much easier just to push the numbers (98% support in some communities). With the electoral vote, it doesn’t matter that one candidate got 80% or 52% of the vote in a state or city.

But even with that, California outside of the large cities votes conservative.


55 posted on 10/21/2008 11:34:38 AM PDT by weegee (In honor of Joe the Plumber, at noon, we should all lower our trousers to half mast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
Is it time to scrap the Electoral College?

No.
56 posted on 10/21/2008 11:35:14 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

Why settle on just the electoral college and go ahead and scrap the entire U.S. Constitution instead?

The liberal mind looks at ways to further its agenda, and when I read about altering the U.S. Constitution from the likes of MSNBC, it riles my blood to boiling.

Isn’t it sinful of us to support the law of this land when it is inconvenient?


57 posted on 10/21/2008 11:35:49 AM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

Perhaps THIS explains why Obama is running ads in California and Massachusetts? They’re worried about the Electoral College, and are trying to run up big margins in the states that they feel they’ve got locked up?


58 posted on 10/21/2008 11:36:20 AM PDT by Antoninus (If you're bashing McCain/Palin at this point, you're helping Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
...The system is a relic of the early days of the republic when electors were supposed to be independent agents exercising their judgment in choosing a presidential candidate from a list of several contenders.

Bunk. In some states the electors were selected by their state legislatures rather than by popular vote, but at no time were electors selected and told "do whatever you think is best". Just look at how the electors cast their votes. They go to their state capitals and each state sends its choices to Washington. If they were meant to be independent agents they would have traveled to Washington and voted there, along with any horse trading needed to get the votes. At no time did the electors (with a few exceptions of disloyal electors) cast votes other than how they were directed by either the people or the legislature.

59 posted on 10/21/2008 11:36:51 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Obama: Spread the Wealth = Marx: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

You folks can engineer all you want but without changing the constitution by allowing all 50 states to vote it will never change.


60 posted on 10/21/2008 11:38:15 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson