Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AG vows to appeal voter verification ruling
Legal Newsline ^ | 10/26/08

Posted on 10/26/2008 10:00:29 AM PDT by jasonmyos

MADISON, Wis. (Legal Newsline) - Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen said Thursday he will appeal a court ruling today that threw out his lawsuit to force officials to cross-check information on voter rolls.

"I believe today's decision was an erroneous interpretation of the law," the Republican attorney general said. "When a lower court gets the law wrong, parties appeal to a higher court, and that's what I will do.

Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi dismissed the lawsuit Thursday, saying Van Hollen lacked the authority to sue to force the state Government Accountability Board to comply with the federal Help America Vote Act of 2002, known as HAVA.

(Excerpt) Read more at legalnewsline.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: acorn; elections; hava; swingstates; voterfraud; wi2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2008 10:00:30 AM PDT by jasonmyos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos
Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi dismissed the lawsuit Thursday, saying Van Hollen lacked the authority to sue to force the state Government Accountability Board to comply with the federal Help America Vote Act of 2002,

Let me get this straight. The State Attorney General has no authority to try to have the law enforced? OTOH, why doesn't he just charge the members of the GAB with willful violation of the law? Let them run to court to try to overturn his actions.

2 posted on 10/26/2008 10:06:24 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

The fix is in. No longer can citizens of this country 1) have a legitimate 1 person, 1 vote election, and 2) question the basic eligibility of a person who is running for the highest office in the land. A conservative would have to win by 10 or 20% in 2012 to overcome the voter fraud to come.... You think it’s bad this year, just wait till future elections.


3 posted on 10/26/2008 10:10:16 AM PDT by FiscalConservative1985
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos

Near as I can tell lately with all the rulingsis...no one, anywhere has any authority or standing to bring any lawsuit about anything election related. Have I got that right?


4 posted on 10/26/2008 10:12:57 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos

If a State Attorney General has no authority on behalf of the people he represents to sue for accountability, then who does???


5 posted on 10/26/2008 10:13:31 AM PDT by pray4liberty (Watch, pray, and work. This election will separate the sheep from the goats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

HAVA is Federal law...he has no jurisdiction. His only recourse is to sue.


6 posted on 10/26/2008 10:18:12 AM PDT by Roccus (Someday it'll all make sense.............maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos

The Democrats are playing with fire. They are undermining confidence in our electoral system with this blatant fraud. One has to look no further than our financial system to understand how quickly and catastrophically institutions can fail when trust disappears.

This is the one of the most dangerous periods in our history since the 1860s.


7 posted on 10/26/2008 10:18:31 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos

ACORN applauded the decision...so obviously it is crooked and anti-American on it’s face. The pinkos win again...for now. Pity.


8 posted on 10/26/2008 10:19:10 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos

so VOTERS have no standing,
so the AG has no standing,

THEN WHERE THE H*LL is the DOJ?

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied.


9 posted on 10/26/2008 10:20:25 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty
If a State Attorney General has no authority on behalf of the people he represents to sue for accountability, then who does???

Why, The One®, of course!

10 posted on 10/26/2008 10:23:02 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama wants to raise taxes and kill babies; Palin wants to raise babies and kill taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Let me get this straight. The State Attorney General has no authority to try to have the law enforced?

You are correct. The statute, itself, is very specific as to who has the right to enforce that particular law and the state attorney general is not one of them. The United States Attorney General, however, does have enforcement authority.

11 posted on 10/26/2008 10:23:53 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos
"I believe today's decision was an erroneous interpretation of the law," the Republican attorney general said. "When a lower court gets the law wrong, parties appeal to a higher court, and that's what I will do.


12 posted on 10/26/2008 10:25:54 AM PDT by Brian S. Fitzgerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiscalConservative1985

The “judge” is from Dane County. Dane County, to quote a friend of mine, is the “black heart of liberalism”.


13 posted on 10/26/2008 10:26:47 AM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos
REMEMBER THE BOSTON TEA PARTY!!!

When the citizens have had enough government BS...THE GOVERNMENT BETTER LOOK OUT!!!

14 posted on 10/26/2008 10:29:00 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Let me get this straight. The State Attorney General has no authority to try to have the law enforced? OTOH, why doesn't he just charge the members of the GAB with willful violation of the law? Let them run to court to try to overturn his actions.

Also announce that those on the GAB who refuse to check people's eligibility before they vote will be prosecuted as accomplices in the casting of every fraudulent ballot which would have been caught had they exercised reasonable diligence.

15 posted on 10/26/2008 10:30:45 AM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
This is the one of the most dangerous periods in our history since the 1860s.

Those of us in the south are gradually being vindicated

16 posted on 10/26/2008 10:42:15 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty

I thought that the Supreme Court ruled that the GOP had no standing to force compliance...that it would have to be an AG that would have standing......or do I have it wrong?


17 posted on 10/26/2008 10:46:46 AM PDT by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GoldenPup
What we need is a couple million folks who feel the same way, and have the guts to do something about it.

It's the last part of that sentence that frustrates me.

18 posted on 10/26/2008 10:47:31 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FiscalConservative1985

If Ubama gets in, there won’t BE future elections—they’ll all be like the ones Saddam Hussein held for years—no opponents (surprise!) and 100% voting for him!

God help us all.


19 posted on 10/26/2008 10:49:53 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative voting for the McCain/Palin ticket now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jasonmyos
Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi dismissed the lawsuit Thursday...

LOL! Commieville Wisconsin judge rules in favor of Wisconsin Communist Party vote manufacturing apparatus. Gee, what a frickin' surprise... ;-)

20 posted on 10/26/2008 10:56:44 AM PDT by an amused spectator (I am Joe, too - I'm talkin' to you, VBM: The Volkischer Beobachter Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson