Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chamblis/Martin heading for a run off in GA?
GA Secretary of State ^

Posted on 11/05/2008 6:15:04 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort

At 9:05 AM with 96% of precincts reporting:

Chamblis - 49.8%

Martin - 46.8%

Buckley - 3.4%


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Non-Sequitur

Where are you seeing >50%? I can’t find anything other than the SOS site.


21 posted on 11/05/2008 6:39:56 AM PST by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Right now Chambliss is showing 50.2% so it may be academic.

The official numbers show 49.9% now. Go Saxby (and bring on the lawyers...).

22 posted on 11/05/2008 6:42:01 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rhetorical pi2

Are we sure the same voters who turned out in huge numbers to make GA close at the presidential level won’t also be there for the runoff? I sure hope not as we need that seat. If Repubs can stay at 44 it isn’t too disastrous.

I am told Martin as is far left a liberal as 0bama. If GA elects him we know it is another sign the nation is just screwed as people have totally gone over to the other side.


23 posted on 11/05/2008 6:43:45 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservative_guyz
He needs to receive this message loud and clear.

Yeah, and he'll have 6 years to forget all about it. He should have been seriously challenged in the primaries. That might have gotten his attention. If he's sent back to the Senate, everything about last night's results will be forgotten and cast aside...

24 posted on 11/05/2008 6:45:51 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: conservative_guyz

You sound like a lot of posters here in 2006. “Teach them a lesson!” blah blah blah. Well, I guess we really showed ‘em, huh? McCain wasn’t my first choice either and he would have driven me crazy had he won but I voted for him b/c I value Republican ideals. Staying home or voting for the Dem in the race doesn’t do us any good.
You feel safe gloating now b/c they didn’t get 60 seats but suppose the GA seat had been the difference? You had no way of knowing that yesterday.
I think it is ridiculous when our side picks an issue and “stands on principle”. Well, stand all you like but if all our voters sit home and pout, we will be routed even more the next time. These elections have huge consequences that effect our daily lives and future generations.


25 posted on 11/05/2008 6:49:13 AM PST by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: conservative_guyz

Oh and by the way, welcome to Free Republic, newbie.


26 posted on 11/05/2008 6:52:11 AM PST by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort

So who will the Buckley supporters vote for in the runoff?


27 posted on 11/05/2008 6:56:59 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I wouldn’t count on them voting at all.


28 posted on 11/05/2008 6:57:59 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski

You’re right - I had no way of knowing that the DEMs wouldn’t have 60 seats, but that doesn’t change anything.

I’m not gloating, just pleased with the result. These are just people. They are no more important than you or I. That is a fact that Saxby has forgotten. You’d have to be in GA to understand.

I didn’t vote for a DEM. I voted for the LIB who represents as many of my political views as the supposed GOP leaders have. Its a trade off I admit, but I don’t have to sulk about having supported a sell-out GOP senator in my backyard.

It sounds like you’re buying into the myth that last night was a historical election in terms of turn-out. It wasn’t... McCain failed to get the turnout. We all knew that was going to be a problem. Obama DID NOT get many more votes that Bush did in ‘04. 62.4 vs 62.1.

The results last night prove to me that this election WAS WINNABLE by the GOP. Despite 22% pres. approval ratings. Despite the economy, despite everything else. Our problem was that our candidate himself carried a lot of apathy with GOP voters. Anyway, that’s another situation alltogether.


29 posted on 11/05/2008 7:00:01 AM PST by conservative_guyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

you’ve heard correctly about Martin - he is a loony lefty. He’ll lose a run-off, and lose it badly...

He’d be a similar Obama lackey as Chamblis has been a Bush lackey.


30 posted on 11/05/2008 7:01:36 AM PST by conservative_guyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: conservative_guyz

I still disagree with your actions but I took your “lib” reference to mean liberal so you have partially redeemed yourself.


31 posted on 11/05/2008 7:02:28 AM PST by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative; slouch-no-more
You Georgians have gotta help me out here.Is a candidate for the US Senate from Georgia required to get more than 50% of the vote in order to take the seat? I'm confused here.
32 posted on 11/05/2008 7:02:59 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

I agree 100%. The GOP need to stop with the incumbent worship. The GOP is setup to squash dissent in the primaries and time after time we have candidates run uncontested in the primaries, only to wake up as we get to the generals ticked at the candidate and wish other options were avaiable.


33 posted on 11/05/2008 7:03:09 AM PST by conservative_guyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Is a candidate for the US Senate from Georgia required to get more than 50% of the vote in order to take the seat?

A candidate must get 50% plus one vote to win the election in GA. If no one gets 50+1, there's a run-off election.

34 posted on 11/05/2008 7:08:36 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: conservative_guyz
The GOP need to stop with the incumbent worship. The GOP is setup to squash dissent in the primaries and time after time we have candidates run uncontested in the primaries, only to wake up as we get to the generals ticked at the candidate and wish other options were avaiable.

Spot on. What a mess. Two thumpin's in a row for most people would be enough to realize the errors of their ways. Somehow, though, I'm not at all optimistic about the Republican Party's future because of their 40+ year history of happily being the minority party. It seems like being the minority party is the only thing "establishment country club" Republicans understand. We got one long row to hoe, that is for sure.....and not a whole lot of time to do it.....

35 posted on 11/05/2008 7:11:02 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
A candidate must get 50% plus one vote to win the election in GA. If no one gets 50+1, there's a run-off election.

Thanks.I didn't know that.That's the way they do things in Europe.You Georgians aren't goin' European on us,are you?

36 posted on 11/05/2008 7:11:30 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski

The numbers are from the AJC ...

http://projects.ajc.com/election-results/2008/11/04/us-senate/

I agree that they don’t match the SOS office numbers. It seems odd ...


37 posted on 11/05/2008 7:12:05 AM PST by Floyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski

I often spell libertarian wrong, so I abbreviated without considering the other common abbreviated term. whoops!


38 posted on 11/05/2008 7:14:09 AM PST by conservative_guyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
You Georgians aren't goin' European on us,are you?

Wrong continent.

39 posted on 11/05/2008 7:15:02 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

The Dems put the +50% rules in place when they ruled the state. They did it because they ran uncontested in primaries and wanted the R’s to face run-offs in primaries. As such, the R’s would always face 2 campaigns and would be tapped out (cash/energy) during the general election.


40 posted on 11/05/2008 7:15:43 AM PST by Floyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson