Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek: McCain Flirted with Lieberman for VP [RINO] [multi-kiloton barf alert]
The Hartford Courant, Hartford, Conn. - On Background ^ | 2008-11-07 | Jesse A. Hamilton

Posted on 11/07/2008 7:21:04 PM PST by rabscuttle385

Newsweek has published a deep, multi-chapter account of the entire 2008 presidential campaign, with a lot of inside perspective. Somewhere in the middle, it deals with Sen. John McCain's friendship with Sen. Joe Lieberman.

McCain had apparently pitched Lieberman's name for the No. 2 spot on the ticket, but the idea was quickly shot down by his advisers.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.courant.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008veep; election; electionpresident; elections; idiot; lieberman; mcbama; mccain; mccaintruthfile; mcqueeg; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-67 next last
From the Newsweek article:

McCain had initially wanted Joe Lieberman. The two senators were fellow romantics, deeply imbued with a sense of righteousness and honor. In mid-August, when NEWSWEEK's editor Jon Meacham was interviewing McCain aboard the campaign plane, the discussion turned to "The Winds of War," Herman Wouk's mega-bestseller about World War II. The main character, a naval commander named Pug Henry, was a favorite of McCain's. As it turned out, Lieberman—sitting just across the aisle and listening in on the NEWSWEEK interview—was a friend of Herman Wouk. "Let's go see Herman!" Lieberman piped up. "Yes!" exclaimed McCain. The two began planning a road trip out to Wouk's California home. "We can shake the money tree," McCain cackled (Wouk lives among the wealthy in Palm Springs, Calif.). McCain loved to travel with Lieberman, a fellow maverick who had stood fast on Iraq, nearly at the cost of his Senate seat in liberal Connecticut. McCain's other traveling buddy, Lindsey Graham, urged McCain to pick Lieberman, still a nominal Democrat, as a way to show that McCain put country over party label—and as a way to answer the Democrats' choice of the first African-American presidential nominee. "We've got to match history with history," Graham declared.

Sickening.

1 posted on 11/07/2008 7:21:05 PM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MaggieCarta; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; djsherin; Sunnyflorida; SoConPubbie; Sybeck1; ...

The Juan McCain Truth File.

"I have great respect for Al Gore."
—John McCain, October 2, 2008

FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add  mccaintruthfile.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.)


Republican Commissar’s Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless GOP shills who simply want to meet a new overlord.

2 posted on 11/07/2008 7:21:53 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" --Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Well, look at it this way. It would have effectively ended the campaign a lot sooner.


3 posted on 11/07/2008 7:22:34 PM PST by Hawk1976 (It is better to die in battle than it is to live as a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Well, look at it this way. It would have effectively ended the campaign a lot sooner.


4 posted on 11/07/2008 7:22:34 PM PST by Hawk1976 (It is better to die in battle than it is to live as a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Why weren’t we running a Republican this election season?


5 posted on 11/07/2008 7:22:46 PM PST by djsherin (The federal government: Because your life isn't screwed up enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

might have been the biggest lanslide since Reagan amd Mondale.


6 posted on 11/07/2008 7:23:03 PM PST by scooby321 (Cai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Wish he had done it. I’d have an extra $400 in the bank for President Obama to take...


7 posted on 11/07/2008 7:24:19 PM PST by Mr Rogers (And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Juan McCainez would have lost by 20 points instead of 6.


8 posted on 11/07/2008 7:28:38 PM PST by blasater1960 ( Dt 30, Ps 111, The Torah is perfect, attainable, now and forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I don’t believe any of this. This is the DBM whom we all said was worthless throughout the campaign, now we’re supposed to give them the time of day?

No. I will view anything reported by the DBM as 1) stuff to prop up Obama or 2) misinformation spread to them by Obama.


9 posted on 11/07/2008 7:28:45 PM PST by randita (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

From a theoretical and political point of view, it seemed like a good idea at the time. McCain could have run as someone who was above partisan politics, a national consensus candidate. But it’s one of those things that may have been good in theory, but never worked in practice.

Sarah Palin was a good choice.


10 posted on 11/07/2008 7:29:24 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Wouldn't that have been a disaster! The talking heads would have loved it. It would have given credence to the McCain senility rumors.
11 posted on 11/07/2008 7:31:04 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

“Wish he had done it. I’d have an extra $400 in the bank for President Obama to take...”

Funny. That’s exactly how much money I gave McCain, and I deliberately held off on donating until I knew he was not choosing a Democrat for VP.


12 posted on 11/07/2008 7:33:16 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hawk1976
true, but we would've gotten a lot more of the Jewish vote.

And Lieberman would've made history as the first man to run as VP for two different major parties just 8 years apart.
watch ... someone will correct me on that ...

13 posted on 11/07/2008 7:34:11 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Teachers open the door. It's up to you to enter. Before the late bell. When I close the door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: randita

“I don’t believe any of this. This is the DBM whom we all said was worthless throughout the campaign, now we’re supposed to give them the time of day?”

When they portray McCain as a disloyal Republican, yes I believe them, since I have independent evidence of that.


14 posted on 11/07/2008 7:34:36 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I doubt I was have voted at all if he had chosen a pro-abortion killing pol for a running mate.

As Ann Coulter said: “the only good thing about McCain is that he gave us a genuine conservative, Sarah Palin. He’s like one of those insects that lives just long enough to reproduce so that the species can survive.”

http://www.anncoulter.com/


15 posted on 11/07/2008 7:35:39 PM PST by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Give it a rest. This story is attempting to do 3 things:

1) Tries to lay the blame at social conservatives who were thrilled about Palin

2) Discredit Palin among those who voted for McCain even though they had some reservations about Palin.

3) Influence her future potential.


16 posted on 11/07/2008 7:39:52 PM PST by Perdogg (01-20-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“Lindsey Graham, urged McCain to pick Lieberman”

IMHO Graham was one of the biggest reasons McCain drifted off course to many times.


17 posted on 11/07/2008 7:41:56 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk1976

Without Sarah Palin he’d have only carried Arizona.


18 posted on 11/07/2008 7:42:15 PM PST by no dems (Obama Wins. America, will we get what we deserve ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hawk1976

“Well, look at it this way. It would have effectively ended the campaign a lot sooner.”

Yes, it would have been McDud’s Joementum.


19 posted on 11/07/2008 7:47:42 PM PST by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I gave $200 the night she was picked, and another 200 in early October.

I also got a letter from John yesterday. It pointed out the final 15 days were coming up, and could I help him with a donation so he could enter the last 15 days with even money.

I don’t think so...

;>)


20 posted on 11/07/2008 7:47:42 PM PST by Mr Rogers (And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
Why weren’t we running a Republican this election season?

Because we let the Dems and the media pick our candidate.

21 posted on 11/07/2008 7:51:04 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Dude, just let it go. He didn’t pick him.


22 posted on 11/07/2008 7:51:46 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

The third party scum are trying their best to amplify the media efforts to destroy the Republican party. It’s so obvious now that it ceases to even be obscene anymore. Pond scum just floats on through and is rejected.


23 posted on 11/07/2008 7:54:08 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: rabscuttle385

Go to your local bookstore, shake out hundreds of the subscription litter cards from Slimes and Newsweak and drop in the mail for pro$$ing. Send a message.


25 posted on 11/07/2008 8:10:20 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
McCain-Lieberman?

That would have been a great career move, John. You might even have done worse than Walter Mondale under that scenario.

26 posted on 11/07/2008 8:22:44 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Maybe they should take their act on the road. Anywhere but DC.


27 posted on 11/07/2008 8:26:57 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Then he would have lost by 15 points and we could have a real fresh, brand new GOP with a swift kick in the pants to the RINOs for one last time.


28 posted on 11/07/2008 8:28:51 PM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

The Jewish vote was 2% of the national total. It’s totally irrelevant. McCain got 21%, with Lieberman may be hets closer to 30%. With such a small total it makes no difference.

But what about FL you say? It wasn’t the Jewish vote thta was the problem there. McCain did just as well as Bush did in 2004. He actually did slightly better among the white vote than Bush did.

The difference was twofold:

1st, a big shift in the black vote to Obama.

2nd and more importantly, the hispanic vote went from 56-44 Bush to 57-42 Obama, a 27 pt swing to the dems.

Would Lieberman have done anything about that? Of course not. I wonder what could have happened since 2004 to cause such a massive shift in the hispanic vote? Could it have been the huge conservative and GOP opposition to immigration that everyone warned would cost us electorally in 2008? Looks like it did just that. A shame since McCain is actually the most pro-hispanic Senator in the GOP, but he took the blame for the larger opposition within th epary and the movement.

Also, Jeb Bush was Gov of FL and had a hispanic wife and was popular with hispanics and George P Bush was part of that hispanic outreach. The anti-dem backlash from the Elian Gonzales case that helped us in 2000 and 2004 probably diminished quite a bit as well. Bush and Rove had cultivated hispanics going back to TX and that helped us there. Immigration reform was an attempt to lock in 40% of the hispanic vote for the GOP. It would have been a huge benefit electorally. Oh well. Now, hispanics may be gone for quite some time.

But Lieberman wouldn’t have done anything about the big shifts in the black and hispanic vote that sunk us in FL. You can’t blame Palin for that either. McCain actually did better with white women in FL than Bush did. I wonder why?


29 posted on 11/07/2008 8:29:36 PM PST by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Norman Bates; MaggieCarta; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; djsherin; Sunnyflorida; ...
The third party scum are trying their best to amplify the media efforts to destroy the Republican party. It’s so obvious now that it ceases to even be obscene anymore. Pond scum just floats on through and is rejected.

For the record, I'm an independent fiscal conservative with strong libertarian leanings and a bit of social conservatism mixed in. However, I owe no loyalty to any party or any faction. Now, if you are going to run around FR referring to me as "third party [pond] scum," either you should use private Freepmail or ping me so I can defend myself.

As for the GOP, the media doesn't need to lift a finger against the Republican Party. Their "maverick" Juan did it all by himself.

30 posted on 11/07/2008 8:46:25 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" --Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

His slogan could have been: Government First or BiPartisan First

What a hack politician.


31 posted on 11/07/2008 8:50:13 PM PST by Globalist Goon ("Head down over a saddle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I haven’t checked the figures, but didn’t he fare quite lackluster in AZ? AZ is moving hard-left like CO and NV.


32 posted on 11/07/2008 8:51:47 PM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; MHGinTN

Third party folks, at least the conservative ones, are hardly scum. I think it’s unwise to vote third party for various reasons, rabscuttle385, but you and I have already covered that ground on other threads.

Let me just say I would readily vote for a conservative third party if I thought it could win or achieve some other equally important effect. So far? No dice. Our best hope lies in retaking the Republican Party.


33 posted on 11/07/2008 9:02:10 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Voted proudly for GOVERNOR Palin for VP (but not so sad that RINO McCain lost)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“McCain’s other traveling buddy, Lindsey Graham, urged McCain to pick Lieberman...”

Ack! And Lindsey just won another six years I believe!


34 posted on 11/07/2008 9:04:19 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Voted proudly for GOVERNOR Palin for VP (but not so sad that RINO McCain lost)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

All anyone wanted was for people to follow the law. I have little time or respect for those that can’t manage that.


35 posted on 11/07/2008 9:06:57 PM PST by Hawk1976 (It is better to die in battle than it is to live as a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
Why weren’t we running a Republican this election season?

The [un]funny thing is, a huge majority here had drunk the Kool-Aid and were harassing those of us who didn't support McCain. Now, of course, they're pretending they knew all along McCain was a big RINO.

36 posted on 11/07/2008 9:25:54 PM PST by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished

I don’t entirely blame them (except some of the more unforgiving ones). I think we’re going to look back in a year and wonder how the hell we ever chose John McCain. Heck I guess people are starting to think that now.


37 posted on 11/07/2008 9:39:36 PM PST by djsherin (The federal government: Because your life isn't screwed up enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

No matter his VP pick would have been his undoing, though Joe would have been a disaster. No, his choice for President was his biggest mistake!


38 posted on 11/07/2008 9:44:13 PM PST by BufordP (Had Mexicans flown planes into the World Trade Center, Jorge Bush would have surrendered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

...and ours as well.


39 posted on 11/07/2008 9:45:33 PM PST by BufordP (Had Mexicans flown planes into the World Trade Center, Jorge Bush would have surrendered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Pond scum just floats on through and is rejected.

It is the Republicans who are being systematically rejected- First in '06, and now in '08. The more that Conservatism identifies itself separately from Republicanism, the more Republicans will fade.

Take that as a word of warning from a thirty year Republican loyalist who is now an independent, willingly voting 3rd party. Not only I, but every one I know have abandoned the Republican party. Those few who were still holding out hope, me among them, were convinced in this election year.

You're on the wrong side of this, MHGinTN, defending the indefensible.

40 posted on 11/07/2008 10:02:42 PM PST by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Exactly. Chuckles Baldwin is already declaring the conservative movement and the Republican party dead.


41 posted on 11/07/2008 10:53:50 PM PST by robert david (The Obamanation is upon us. God help America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

How many votes did your loser Chuckie get?


42 posted on 11/07/2008 10:59:07 PM PST by robert david (The Obamanation is upon us. God help America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Yep. I would have gladly given up another seat to be rid of that putz. Good grief.


43 posted on 11/07/2008 11:02:10 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

He won AZ by double-digits.


44 posted on 11/07/2008 11:08:15 PM PST by robert david (The Obamanation is upon us. God help America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

We were, but some on the far right preferred to act like spoiled children and refused to financially support our nominee causing him to seek federal funding and limit his overall intake of cash. If that applies to you, then you are responsible for McCain’s defeat. Enjoy President Obama.


45 posted on 11/07/2008 11:15:41 PM PST by robert david (The Obamanation is upon us. God help America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: robert david
How many votes did your loser Chuckie get?

I did not vote for Chuck Baldwin. I have stated plainly many times that the CP's view on the GWOT is unpalatable to a Reagan Conservative.

I did not vote at all, as I could not get to the polls. I am set up for absentee ballot from now on, so that will no longer be an issue.

Had I been able to, my vote would have gone to Alan Keyes.

46 posted on 11/08/2008 12:38:40 AM PST by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: robert david; djsherin
We were, but some on the far right preferred to act like spoiled children and refused to financially support our nominee causing him to seek federal funding and limit his overall intake of cash. If that applies to you, then you are responsible for McCain’s defeat.

What an incredibly foolish statement. The Republicans have no right or expectation of Conservative support *at_all* beyond the support and commitment that the Republican party gives to Conservative ideals. That has ALWAYS been the case, and will not change. What is in me, is in my sons too, and will be in their sons as well.

This election, from it's beginning, was about spitting in the Conservatives' eye. It was about making up the difference in the middle. As it turns out, your player got the same answer every other RINO has- with bells on.

You lose.

If you want Conservative support, you will bring it to us, *not* the other way around. That IS the way it is, or we will go elsewhere, as we are doing in record numbers. Like it, or lump it.

As for the fault, it lies with those who try to make Conservatives go where they will not, and where they never have. In your defense, your plan was to bypass us, originally, but the effect is the same. Don't blame us for not wanting to eat sh!t sandwich. next time, serve up something tasty.

47 posted on 11/08/2008 1:32:02 AM PST by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

The GOP is afraid of its own shadow. The hollowness is from within.


48 posted on 11/08/2008 3:30:51 AM PST by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: robert david

I’m responsible for McCain’s defeat because I didn’t give the campaign money? Firstly, I don’t have tons of spare cash to toss out to candidates who don’t share my beliefs. Secondly, I live in California, which is a statement that speaks for itself. Thirdly, no I will not enjoy Obama.


49 posted on 11/08/2008 11:35:23 PM PST by djsherin (The federal government: Because your life isn't screwed up enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
The Jewish vote was 2% of the national total. It’s totally irrelevant. McCain got 21%, with Lieberman may be hets closer to 30%. With such a small total it makes no difference.

Funny you should mention 30%. That's usually the threshold that analysts -- all of them, even the conservative ones -- say that Republican candidates need. They don't find it irrelevant.

Forget 2004. In 2000, Lieberman was the reason that Gore nearly took Florida, why it was even close enough in the first place to try to steal it.

And reread my point, I didn't say that Lieberman would've won it for McCain. Doubt that he would. But he would've changed the dynamics of the race.

50 posted on 11/09/2008 5:46:20 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (Teachers open the door. It's up to you to enter. Before the late bell. When I close the door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson