Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Head Strong: Ignoring suburbs doomed the GOP To win Pa., it must appeal to moderates.
Philly.com ^ | November 9, 2008 | Michael Smerconish

Posted on 11/09/2008 3:37:09 AM PST by gusopol3

Head Strong: Ignoring suburbs doomed the GOP To win Pa., it must appeal to moderates. By Michael Smerconish - Inquirer

Inquirer Currents Columnist

If retail politicking alone determined the election outcome in Pennsylvania, McCain-Palin would have won in a landslide. Speaking on MSNBC election night, Gov. Rendell joked that the GOP ticket had spent so much time in the state that he was thinking of assessing them with a state income tax.

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: advertising; bho2008; mccain; pa2008; pennsylvania; suburbs; vichyrepublican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
This perspective from somebody who thinks he should be helping to shape the GOP. He's right about one thing, McCain threw a lot of money down a rat hole in PA.
1 posted on 11/09/2008 3:37:09 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Hm, wasn’t it the moderates who managed, ran, and planned the entire 08 presidential campaign, promising they could deliver the centrists and independents?

How’d that work out again?

****

Before you try to appeal to indies and the moderates, first you MUST get the support of the base. Failure to do so is like building a house without a foundation - it doesn’t stay standing for long.


2 posted on 11/09/2008 3:41:17 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
McCain was doomed from the start you can not be all things to all people. That's why when true conservatives use conservatism to run on they win nearly every time. That's also why Sarah will win in 2012. She is a conservative,not a stinking RINO!
3 posted on 11/09/2008 3:41:55 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
The Philadelphia suburbs have become infested with the same ultra-liberal human waste that doomed Philadelphia. The same has become true for most other cities.

However, I do agree that the GOP should not have bothered wasting a single penny campaigning anywhere in the northeast (Maryland on up) and instead focused more on Ohio and Florida instead.

4 posted on 11/09/2008 3:43:50 AM PST by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

That’s true but if his message wasn’t working in PA, it wasn’t working anywhere. It was an indication of a failed message.


5 posted on 11/09/2008 3:45:03 AM PST by beagleone (Sarah Palin for President in 2012. Lets start fundraising ASAP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

There are many who would love to move the GOP to the left. Deep down, these people actually liked what Bush and the GOP did over the last 8 years, they were just upset these people had an ‘R’ after their name.

Once the GOP returns to its conservative roots and proves it can lead by cutting the size of gov’t, it will be a majority party again.

After all, Obama had to run on tax cuts and fiscal responsibility in order to get elected....just like Clinton did.

Conservatism has won the argument. We just can’t seem to get it implemented due to softees in our party.


6 posted on 11/09/2008 3:45:38 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Can we please ignore the tripe this turncaot has to peddle? Nobody is interested in his egotistical analysis of Republicans. The fact is, outside of Gov. Sarah Palin, there was no Conservative voice. McCain did not want Conservatives, and that’s exactly what he got.

This guy is no more qualified to comment on the Republican Party than a Mohammedan critiquing the Bible.


7 posted on 11/09/2008 3:46:28 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Money and time spent in states where there were Republican Senate seats in jeopardy might have at least been of some benefit, rather than PA. A huuuuge miscalculation.


8 posted on 11/09/2008 3:47:08 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

I do not plan to be taking any advice from an Obamatron like Smerconish.


9 posted on 11/09/2008 3:47:32 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
In a way, McCain's thinking was right. If he wins PA, then he probably doesn't have to worry about the rest of the country, because it would mean that his message was resonating with the voters.

PA was a battleground state he had to win if he was going to win it. But he wasn't gonna win it anywhere.

I find it interesting that Oklahoma and Tennessee voted Redder than ever in the midst of the loss. I'm thinking that those voters, Dem. and Rep., REALLY loved Sarah Palin. It sure wasn't McCain which got them to vote against the current.
10 posted on 11/09/2008 3:50:24 AM PST by beagleone (Sarah Palin for President in 2012. Lets start fundraising ASAP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
This guy is no more qualified to comment on the Republican Party than a Mohammedan critiquing the Bible

I agree with you, his support of Obama has been greatly to the benefit of Bill Bennett who competes in the Philly market (not sure but I thought I heard a woman introduce herself as Smerconish's mom call in to Bennett). also note that he's still trying to sell tickets to his up-coming Book Club that usually sell out on the first day, it seems.

11 posted on 11/09/2008 3:51:48 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Smerconjob is neither a Republican, nor a moderate, nor an Obama man (even though he voted for The One).

Smerconjob is an opportunist with no principles whatsoever.

And, since he is a man without honor or principle, why should we take his “advice”?


12 posted on 11/09/2008 3:53:10 AM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

...and I think you have to have a message, M A V R I C K isn’t it. He was all over the same map as Mr Obama with somewhat less ability to energize anyone due to the age difference. It was obvious early on, that there wasn’t much there to recommend him as a Republican Candidate. He just happened to be a nominee of the party, the msm or whomever. There was no one to rally around until Sarah Barracuda.

What I would like to know, is if he was bitten in any way by the results of his own misguided legislation McCain/Feingold.


13 posted on 11/09/2008 3:54:57 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

‘Moderate’ is just another word for self-hating Republican.
What the GOP needs to do is appeal to common sense conservatism again, tending to the business of governing while always remembering that the government that governs least governs best.

Republicans need to return to making courageous stands against the expansion of government, explaining to people why they don’t want government having more control over their lives and their decision, instead of going along with massive expansions just because they think opposing it would be “bad politics.”


14 posted on 11/09/2008 3:55:53 AM PST by counterpunch ( Mike Pence for House Minority Leader. Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Remember the RNC claiming that they could do that because they didn’t have enough money?

I wonder why that would be, considering that Republicans typically outraise Democrats by quite a bit.... Could it be that they failed to gain the support of the base by being “Democrat Lite”?


15 posted on 11/09/2008 3:56:27 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

in being superficial, maybe he embodies the suburban voter that he speaks of, that the GOP has lost over the last 20 years. These people don’t know how badly the Democrat/ Socialists can hurt them.


16 posted on 11/09/2008 3:58:10 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

We need to run a canadidate that supports global warming wealth confiscation, camapaign finance reform and can reach across the aisle to moderate fascists and Marxists.

Maybe someone like McCain can run.


17 posted on 11/09/2008 3:58:41 AM PST by sergeantdave (We are now in the Age of the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beagleone
In a way, McCain's thinking was right. If he wins PA, then he probably doesn't have to worry about the rest of the country, because it would mean that his message was resonating with the voters.

It is because he failed to convince voters he would be a better President than Obama. He wasnt very charismatic, the campaign was incompetent, and he didnt act like a leader during the financial crisis. That is why it wasnt even close.
18 posted on 11/09/2008 3:58:57 AM PST by igoramus08 (Democrats caused Fannie and Freddie to collapse and this Economic Crisis and Recession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: beagleone
It sure wasn't McCain which got them to vote against the current.

Me neither....

19 posted on 11/09/2008 4:01:04 AM PST by dirtbiker ("Ignorance" is curable. "Stupid" is terminal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wita
is if he was bitten in any way by the results of his own misguided legislation McCain/Feingold.

my guess is that he was helped by it in the primaries, where none of the competitors had a lot of money (except Romney with his own) as I remember it. On the other hand, if there were any provisions in it that limited the Obama money machine, I don't know what they were.

20 posted on 11/09/2008 4:01:52 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson