Insufficient public interest? (Certifigate)

WND ^ | 11/24/08 | Joe Farah

[pissant]

Another lawsuit attempting to obtain a copy of Barack Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate was thrown out Friday by a judge who said there was "insufficient evidence to indicate that the public interest supports" the document's release.

Judge Bert Ayabe upheld arguments from Republican Gov. Linda Lingle's office, which, inexplicably, has fought tooth and nail to protect the birth certificate from public scrutiny even though it remains the key to establishing whether the man elected to be the next president is actually eligible under the Constitution.

Ayabe ruled that Andy Martin, the man who filed the suit, did not have standing under state law because he did "not have a direct and tangible interest in the vital statistic records being sought, namely the birth certificate of President Obama."

Yes, you read that right. The judge in the case not only denied the motion, he also elevated Obama to the presidency before the Electoral College votes and before the Inauguration takes place Jan. 20. Is it any wonder he didn't understand the constitutional issues at stake?

But it is that other excuse for not releasing the document that really has me bugged – "insufficient evidence to indicate that the public interest supports" the release.

[pissant]

Some judges need to be impeached over this.

[AmericanDave]

With judges like that we won’t even recognize this country in 4 years!

[ohiogrammy]

Where there is smoke there is fire. Something is definitely going on here...

[missnry]

Ayabe ruled that Andy Martin, the man who filed the suit, did not have standing under state law because he did "not have a direct and tangible interest in the vital statistic records being sought, namely the birth certificate of President Obama."

CAN YOU IMPEACH A JUDGE FOR BEING STUPID? This is UNBELIEVABLE a judge would be that ARROGANT to call a man WHO IS NOT PRESIDENT the PRESIDENT!!

[ExTexasRedhead]

The “public” has not been informed of these lawsuits; what “no interest” is this fool yammering about? Welcome to Nazi Germany 2008. Joseph Goebbel’s talking from the bench.

[autumnraine]

“Another lawsuit attempting to obtain a copy of Barack Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate was thrown out Friday by a judge who said there was “insufficient evidence to indicate that the public interest supports” the document’s release.”

What the bloody hell??

So the law only applies if enough people are interested?

I’d imagine no one was interested in my speeding ticket I got a few years back, if I get another maybe I can use this case as PRECEDENT??

Please, at some point will some attorneys get on this issue for the sake of love of law if no other reason!?!

I’m starting to think that the only person not going completely out of their way to get this nightmare into office is me and my fellow Freepers. Maybe he really did make a deal with Satan. Good Lord.

[waxer1]

Not even Hanity, Limbaugh, Ingraham, Mark Levin is talking about this.

For shame on them.

[OldNavyVet]

To some appreciable and shameful extent, America no longer has three branches of government.

[Emmett McCarthy]

I’m afraid it’s not going to take 4 years myself.

[autumnraine]

You know ohio, you are right. With this blatant and outrageous disregard for law, there is SOMETHING being covered up.

I just don’t think anyone is of moral fiber anymore to do anything.

This birth certificate issue makes me want to cry for my nation, literally. Because so many people just don’t care. Including the ones who are paid to protect us.

[gandalftb]

Judges are not risk-takers. But this judge has done something very important. His ruling about standing and public interest is so ridiculous, I believe he deliberately left the opening for a quick appeal.

As Obama said, it was above his pay grade, kick it upstairs.

[Grampa Dave]

The daily lament from trolls and those with personal identity problems: "I'm so depressed and embarassed that Free Republic Freepers are demanding that Obama prove he is eligible to be president! I will not be able to work today!"

[MrB]

Hey, folks

“insufficient public interest”

doesn’t mean “there aren’t enough people interested in this”.

“Public interest” means the good of society and the country. And this judge is trying to state that 0bama’s birth citizenship will not adversely affect the country.

[autumnraine]

Apparently we have to take the DNC's word that Obama is A-ok. An email from a friend just now: Dear Concerned Voter: The Colorado Secretary of Stateʼs office, has received numerous calls and emails inquiring into the procedures undertaken to ensure that presidential candidates are qualified to be placed on the ballot. This email is intended to answer your questions regarding the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States. First, please understand that, pursuant to Colorado statute, the process of nominating and certifying presidential candidates to the ballot is party-oriented; candidates are certified to the state and, therefore, the legal responsibility for confirming citizenship (or any other qualification) lies with the certifying entity. Any questions regarding the qualifications of a presidential candidate should be directed to the parties, who are the certifying entities in this case. Second, if you wish to challenge the qualifications of a Presidential candidate, the proper forum is the district court, not the Secretary of Stateʼs office. Because the nomination and certification of candidates is purely a party function, this office lacks the authority to investigate complaints levied against a particular candidateʼs eligibility or qualifications for office. Please see section 1-4-909, C.R.S., for more information regarding challenges to a candidateʼs qualifications. In sum, please direct any inquiries regarding the qualifications of candidates to the respective parties. If you wish to challenge these qualifications, you must do so in district court. Thank you for contacting the Secretary of Stateʼs office. Elections Division Colorado Secretary of State Elections Division 1700 Broadway, Suite 270 Denver, CO 80290 Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:51 AM To: Public Elections Subject: I have a question about this election. I was wondering if anyone in your office would, under penalty of perjury and under oath, affirm that Barack Obama provided a copy of his birth certificate to any in your office to prove he was eligible to run?..He will not release it to the public, I am afraid he did not to those charged with certifying the ballot either. Thanks, Allen

[cripplecreek]

"insufficient evidence to indicate that the public interest supports"

I'd like to see him show that one in his lawbooks. Does it mean the judge throws out all the cases that don't bring a public outcry?

[autumnraine]

You know what? You might be right! Give a ridiculous ruling to give it quick appeal without it being on his head.

I have hope. Yes, it’s a tiny bead, a speck, but it’s there. HOPE!

[PennsylvaniaMom]

I agree. Love of law? How’s about respect and honor of the Constitution?

Is Lingle really fighting tooth and nail, or is that just agrandisement? I understood the sealing of the document (to prevent tampering) but why keep it out of the Court? Or is the Supremes’ discussion the only valid recourse? In any event, something doesn’t pass the smell test here.

[dblshot]

No public interest in making sure a person is qualified for President? What does this judge think makes something in the public interest? Perhaps a multimillion dollar investigation into who leaked Valarie Plame’s name after her husband published his wife works for the CIA? Or maybe a multimillion dollar investigation into fired a bunch of politically appointed lawyers working at the pleasure of the president? But certainly not a $100 effort into looking at a piece of paper providing citizenship proof. It makes no sense; which I think might be a good name for the era of Obama, the No Sense Administration. Through the looking glass we have stepped, now where that pill that makes me smaller?

[DaveyB]

I think, but cannot confirm that you have a direct real and authentic quote in your posting form the CO AOG? Can you confirm or deny this!

BTW please forgive the snarky comment, but paragraphs are your friend!

[generally]

Yes. What’s up with that? Sure, there is the possibility that it’s all legitimate. In that case there is no harm in proving it. No one will look stupid provided they are not claiming that it is fake. They just need to claim that it needs to be proven in order to settle the issue. This should not be remotely controversial.

If it is fake, we have a big problem. If it is real, we can all go forward without this major doubt hanging over the country’s future.