Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WROTNOWSKI V. CONNECTICUT SOS DOCKETED AT SUPREME COURT, DOCKET No. 08A469
US Supreme Court ^ | 11/26/08 | US Supreme Court

Posted on 11/26/2008 1:14:12 PM PST by BP2

No. 08A469 Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State

Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date, Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. ----------------------------------------------------


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; donofrio; obama; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last
This is the case Leo Donofrio was helping with yesterday.

It'll be going up to Ginsburg, challenging Obama's online birth certificate.

1 posted on 11/26/2008 1:14:12 PM PST by BP2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BP2

Uh. So...

What does this mean?

Yeah, I’m ignorant of the court system. So sue me! :P


2 posted on 11/26/2008 1:15:48 PM PST by CE2949BB (Fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2

SCOTUS aint gonna touch this with a ten foot, grounded, sanitized pole.


3 posted on 11/26/2008 1:15:51 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2

more on it here:

http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com/2008/11/treason-at-scotus-bickell-guilty-of.html


4 posted on 11/26/2008 1:16:16 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

They keep getting more and more lawsuits, they will. Especially if the evidence of forgery gets in front of them.


5 posted on 11/26/2008 1:17:11 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BP2
GinsBurg! Ah geez, what a bummer. Hopefully the full supreme court will hear it.
6 posted on 11/26/2008 1:18:32 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

When Ginsburg rejects the petition, can he submit it to any Justice? So could he submit it to Thomas or Scalia?


7 posted on 11/26/2008 1:18:48 PM PST by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
<ping>
8 posted on 11/26/2008 1:21:27 PM PST by tomkat ( handcrafted handmirrors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

For those who are not following Donofrio’s case:

Leo thinks the way Cort’s case is structured, it’s even STRONGER than Leo’s case!

Cort will argue, among other things, that Obama has fraudulently displayed an irrelevant document claiming it validated his claim to Natural born Citizenship when in fact it does not. That will then “open the door” for review by the SCOTUS.

They also have found a previous SCOTUS case that is stronger than what they’ve found up to this point.

To see a little of Cort’s case, go to his blog here:

http://countusout.wordpress.com/2008/11/22/cort-wrotnowski-of-connecticut-vs-secretary-of-state/


9 posted on 11/26/2008 1:23:12 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BP2

They need about six or seven SCOTUS lawyers and then they need to go to the other states where suits were filed and shape those up to be docketed for supreme court consideration in early december.

Next would be the california case.

But it would be nice to get one in where there wasn’t a liberal justice with the right of first refusal.


10 posted on 11/26/2008 1:26:40 PM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Good,...keep it in front of them!


11 posted on 11/26/2008 1:28:26 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

This should be heard since it is about the law of the land. Either Obama is eligible to run or he is ineligible.

Everyone including lawyers; MSM; etc can spin this all they want; but it is a legitimate and real question.

The law says if you are not a natural born citizen or citizen of the US; you can not run for office of the President of the United States.


12 posted on 11/26/2008 1:28:46 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes
SCOTUS aint gonna touch this with a ten foot, grounded, sanitized pole.

There are Poles taller than Sudanese?
13 posted on 11/26/2008 1:29:07 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
There is coordination with many of the cases to get this issue in front of the SCOTUS from many different angles. That includes Justices who are not necessarily Constitutionalists.

If I understand it correctly, at least 3 more cases are pending to be "kicked up" to the SCOTUS in the next 10 days that are not there now.

Throw that in with massive coordinated effort to ask for Republican Governors, SOS's and Electors to demand more documented proof regarding Obama's Natural Born Citizenship status, we're about to hit a "tipping point" on this issue!


14 posted on 11/26/2008 1:30:46 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BP2

From listening to Leo on the radio - he had almost no time to file his SCOTUS case. Leo had no sleep for 5 days, threw it together, raced down to DC from Jersey. He had been jerked around in Jersey courts and then got the same treatment by Danny Bickell.

Leo said he could have done a better job if he had more time. You have to realize this is one guy working alone who is semi-retired from the law throwing together a case in a short period of time on no sleep! Amazing!

My guess is Cort may have had more time and learned from Leo’s research.


15 posted on 11/26/2008 1:31:18 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

I have talked to a few people on both sides of the issue that didn’t know this was going on. What surprised me was their first and adamant answer was “It is against the law for a person who is not a natual born citizen or citizen to run for the office of the President of the United States.

Surprised the heck out of me that people on both sides agree and you wouldn’t think all of these people would know this; but they do.


16 posted on 11/26/2008 1:31:28 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
a person who is not a natual born citizen or citizen

Citizen isn't enough. You have to be a natural born citizen. The constitution clearly distinguishes between the two.

17 posted on 11/26/2008 1:37:43 PM PST by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

The sticky point is the definition of “Natural Born.” I think we have ALL been taught in high school that N.B. is defined as “born on US soil,” and that’s the end of it. Leo’s case will argue that we were all taught wrong! MSM will have a field day.

We need to pray for each of the SCOTUS members. This will be a tough call for them either way.


18 posted on 11/26/2008 1:40:29 PM PST by oprahstheantichrist (The MSM is a demonic stronghold, PLEASE pray accordingly. 2 Cor. 10:3-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

We need to pray for each of the SCOTUS members. This will be a tough call for them either way.”

IMO, IF the Supremes do NOT throw NObama out on his ear and tell him he is NOT the next President, it opens the door for any of the following to run for USA President:
Kofi Annin
Mugambe
Hugo Chavez
Raoul Castro
Margaret Thatcher
Prince Charles/ or Camilla
Achmininijab—the nut case in Iran
Abbas

Pick your poison.


19 posted on 11/26/2008 1:49:05 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

California is in the 9th Circuit so Justice Kennedy would get the first application


20 posted on 11/26/2008 1:52:23 PM PST by LongIslandConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BP2

You can click on the link below to listen Leo Donofrio’s interview with Scott Hennen earlier this morning.

http://www.am1100.tv/Article.asp?id=851727&spid=26086

Short and sweet. It is about 5 minutes long and definitely worth the listen. Also, I sent Scott Hennen a “thank you” email for his interview with Leo. His email is scotth@am1100.tv

Maybe if we flood some of the radio stations who put their toe in the water with a “thank you” then they will have Leo on again and for longer.

I would love it if someone could send me the actual audio file so I can send it to some of my local conservative radio stations around here. Maybe this could take flight from internet to radio to print to television.

I think if we can send that radio file around to other radio hosts and peak their interest.

It may be the key to opening the flood gates.


21 posted on 11/26/2008 1:54:56 PM PST by joygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Surprised the heck out of me that people on both sides agree and you wouldn’t think all of these people would know this; but they do.

That's why I think the idea of "overturning the will of the people" in the election is a false premise. There should be a significant number of voters who would not have cast their ballot for Obama had they known he was not eligible under the Constitution. Enough to swing the election to McCain? Maybe so.

22 posted on 11/26/2008 1:55:52 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
IMO, IF the Supremes do NOT throw NObama out on his ear and tell him he is NOT the next President, it opens the door for any of the following to run for USA President:

Hey, how about Bill Clinton running for a third term? If we aren't going to defend the Constitution on this issue, then the door is wide open.

23 posted on 11/26/2008 1:58:07 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

I think so. I believe that Souter wouldn’t look at Donofrio’s case, so he took it to Thomas. (I could be wrong.)


24 posted on 11/26/2008 2:00:00 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (We have elected a man ... who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen. - Dollard post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist
The sticky point is the definition of “Natural Born.” I think we have ALL been taught in high school that N.B. is defined as “born on US soil,” and that’s the end of it. Leo’s case will argue that we were all taught wrong! MSM will have a field day.

This is the part I don't understand about Donofrio's case. He asserts that even if Obama was born in Hawaii, he is ineligible because his father was a British subject and thus Obama is automatically a "dual citizen" due to British law at the time. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding Donofrio's contention. Surely we have had other past presidents who had one or both parents born in Britain or other countries? I haven't done the research, just wondering.

25 posted on 11/26/2008 2:01:15 PM PST by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LongIslandConservative

Yep...

Justice Ginsburg - WROTNOWSKI
Justice Thomas - DONOFRIO
Justice Kennedy - KEYES (Relief not requested as of yet)
Justice Souter - BERG (dismissed, but awaiting responses by Dec. 1)

... starting to notice a trend here ... death by a thousand papercuts


26 posted on 11/26/2008 2:02:57 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Awesome! That would be the 3rd case to the U.S. Supreme Court according to my count? This case really is growing some legs.

Note this citizenship petition against Obama:
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


27 posted on 11/26/2008 2:03:08 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith

I really agree with what you are saying. All of the people I asked responded exactly the same way. It’s against the law. It’s not often you will get a 100 percent verdict on anything; but that was what happened here. Both sides too.


28 posted on 11/26/2008 2:05:58 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BP2

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


29 posted on 11/26/2008 2:09:37 PM PST by SerafinQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Did you notice the error message when you click on this link? It says the blog is under review for possible usage violations.


30 posted on 11/26/2008 2:10:01 PM PST by koraz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
I believe that Souter wouldn’t look at Donofrio’s case, so he took it to Thomas. (I could be wrong.)

Other reasons, I believe... From Sunday:

Alligations of misconduct by SCOTUS staff forwarded to Chief Justice Roberts

This past week, Leo C. Donofrio forwarded to the Honorable Chief Justice John G. Roberts an official allegation of misconduct against SCOTUS stay clerk, Danny Bickell ...

31 posted on 11/26/2008 2:10:16 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Thanks for clarification. (This Bickell weenie — he has too much power IMO.)


32 posted on 11/26/2008 2:12:39 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (O to grace how great a debtor daily I'm constrained to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: koraz
Yes.

The Obots figure if they can click on “Flag Blog” enough times, they can get him banned or make it look like he's illegitimate.

That's why YOU & I have to use OUR First Amendment rights of Free Speech since the Media is acting negligently with their First Amendment rights by not reporting on what's happening!

33 posted on 11/26/2008 2:16:47 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

I have two thoughts on this issue (other than I think he is guilty as h e l l):

1) Obama looks different - have you seen him in the press conferences this week? He does not look like a man who is racing to the White House. He looks tired, he doesn’t smile, he’s somewhat terse in his comments, hmmmm . . .

2) The silence is deafening. Not only from MSM and talk show radio. But where are the millions of Obamabots like there were during the election. Remember? Anytime any sort of comment was raised on a blog, there would be a swarm of Obamabots dropping f-bombs and trying to negate anything that was said. Besides the random poser, or those who voted for Obama but don’t know the truth, where are the masses of Obamabots taking up their messiah?


34 posted on 11/26/2008 2:24:39 PM PST by Free America52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

I wonder if he is feeling guilt about the con job he pulled off to get elected. Or maybe, he has taken time to see how cruel the real world really is and that lives depend on his every decision. My guess is that he knows he bit off more than he could chew and worst of all, he can’t please or fool everyone for 4 more years and re-election is going to be really tough and his legacy is already on the way down.


35 posted on 11/26/2008 2:28:08 PM PST by SerafinQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

He’s held what - 3 news conferences for the office of president elect (what an egotistic stretch)

Can’t wait until one of his hand picked reporters(?) asks him why he has 17 cases against him related to his BC and why he hasn’t authorized Hawaii to release it yet.

Course that reporter had better want to retire to a community newspaper in rural Georgia - but it could happen.


36 posted on 11/26/2008 2:34:15 PM PST by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All

FAX THIS LETTER TO CLARENCE THOMAS.
FREE FAX: http://faxzero.com/

The Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20543

[Faxed to 202-479-2971]

Dear Justice Thomas

I respectfully request that you consider reviewing Docket No. 08A407 Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant v. Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State.

Our Constitution in Article II Section 1 Paragraph 5 states “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President”.

Mr. Donofrio represents a considerable number of citizens noting the conspicuous failure of the presidential-designate to produce sufficient proof of compliance with the above constitutional requirement.

The work of Mr. Ron Polarik has shown all Certificates of Live Birth to date to have been forgeries.

Thank you for your consideration of this extremely critical matter.

.

Freedommarch.org
http://www.freedommarch.org/

Freedommarch.org makes no vows to ‘accept’, ‘work with’ or ‘unite behind’ Obama, but to do everything they can to discredit and bring him down and fight his legislation.
They do NOT ask for money.

During Joe Thunder’s (head of FreedomMarch.Org)radio broadcast Tues. with Keyes’ lawyer, Kreep, he asked him what we could do to help him.
This was his reply:

1.Donate (lawsuit VERY expensive)
2.Spread the word about the bc suit
3.Email Debra Bowen, Sec. of State of California.
Ask her to uphold the constitution, do her job and be sure Obama is a citizen of the U.S.

Go to this page which contains an online form for an email for Debra Bowen:
http://www.sos.ca.gov/webcontact/general/question.aspx

ACTION CENTER- See website. Updated daily, radio broadcasts.

Action you can take today.

1. Inform McCain campaign to challenge the eligibility of Obama.
2. Forward this site to your friends and colleagues.
3. Join FreedomMarch.org
4. Direct other anti-Obama organizations to contact FreedomMarch.org. Alliances are forming.
5. Direct media to FreedomMarch.org
6. Blog like crazy. Talk about FreedomMarch.org

One Patriot can make an incredible difference. It may be you. We must act quickly. Work hard.

Patriot Volunteers are needed . Everyone can achieve much more than he/she may believe, and everyone may contribute in some fashion. No effort is too small or large. Currently, all hands are needed for the following duties:

Online Volunteer Recruitment
Online Promotion
Field Duties
State-level leaders
Editorial Contributors for Permanent FM.org site.
YouTube video producers
News watchers
Forum Moderators
Idea people
We need all your anti-Obama info for the new FM website: Videos, news articles, etc. Send links.
Thank You!

MCCAIN/REPUBLICAN PARTY
Fax: 202-228-2862
Send a fax FREE: https://faxzero.com/

rickdavis@johnmccain.com, ameese@mccain08hq.com, anickel@mccain08hq.com,
johnmccain@gop.com, info@gop.com,
RNCommunications@gop.com, Chairman@gop.com, Political@gop.com

Supreme Court Justice David Souter
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543

Address of supreme court justice who is one of the justices who is in charge of the Berg case where BHO is supposed to show his birth certificate. All of us should take a minute and send a letter to this gentleman and encourage him to stand up for the Constitution of the United States of America

IMPORTANT
Be sure to add your name and town and email - or they won’t read them.
They won’t read mass emails so put just one email add in the “to” line then click on BBC at the end of that line. a BCC line will open just above subject line. copy paste the rest of the addresses in there and each recipient will see ONLY their name.

SIGN PETITION, SEND EMAILS TO REPRESENTATIVES; DEMAND BIRTH CERTIFICATE HERE:

SIGN PETITION:
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/

http://www.democratic-disaster.com/index.php?topic=318.msg990#msg990

Notify your representative that you demand Obama produce a birth certificate.

After you contact your Electors, Contact your U.S. Congress and Senate Representatives and ask them to keep their sworn oath to support and defend the Constitution!

Sign the petition and have the emails automatically sent to your Reps by clicking here: http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/

-OR- copy the letter below and mail it snail mail. Find your Reps Addresses on this site:http://www.visi.com/juan/congress

Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis

When you were first elected and as tradition requires you have sworn the oath: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me G-d.”

Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads: “No Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”

There are numerous questions as to Obama’s citizen status raising suspicion and doubt about Obama constitutional qualification to be president. To settle these questions Mr. Obama must produce proof of citizenship!

Documents that must be produced include;
(a) a certified copy of “vault” (original long version) birth certificate;
(b) certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham;
(c) a certified copy Certification of Citizenship;
(d) a certified copy Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity;
(e) certified copies of admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and
(f) certified copies of any court orders or legal documents changing his name from Barry Soetoro.

It is reasonable that these documents should be produced considering that his father is Kenyan, his adoptive father is Indonesian, and his grandmother claims to have been present at his birth in Kenya. If he is a natural born citizen then producing these documents should not be any problem.

These allegations will not go away until Mr. Obama produces proof to federal authorities and the public. If he will not do so voluntarily he must be compelled by every means available. You, as an employee of The People, have sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution.

We The People are demanding you to make every effort, both public and private, to resolve this fundamental Constitutional question before 20 January.

To Send This Email In Seconds Click Here: http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/

http://www.democratic-disaster.com/index.php?topic=318.0

ElRushbo@eibnet.com,
me@glennbeck.com,
Hannity@foxnews.com,
Friends@foxnews.com,
Feedback@foxnews.com,
Jamie@foxnews.com,
Feedback@foxnews.com,
Viewerservices@foxnews.com,
FNS@foxnews.com, Newswatch@foxnews.co, Foxreport@foxnews.com

.


37 posted on 11/26/2008 2:36:49 PM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BP2

“That’s why YOU & I have to use OUR First Amendment rights of Free Speech since the Media is acting negligently with their First Amendment rights by not reporting on what’s happening!”
**********

I agree. The bias in the print and television media is well known. But, it is becoming clear to me that the left controls most sites on the internet as well. Ever notice the left bias when you do a google search? It’s everywhere!


38 posted on 11/26/2008 2:55:03 PM PST by koraz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Those of us who live in red states who happen to have a Republican Secretary of State should be asking said officials to order Obama to provide documentation of intelligibility before they will certify the election results. Not that it will do any good, though... sigh.
39 posted on 11/26/2008 4:00:30 PM PST by Sparticus (Libs, they're so open minded that their brains leaked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus
order Obama to provide documentation of intelligibility

LOL, he'll cough up his long form birth certificate before anything documenting his intelligibility can be cobbled together.

40 posted on 11/26/2008 4:16:42 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

>>> LOL, he’ll cough up his long form birth certificate before anything documenting his intelligibility can be cobbled together.

Maybe, but with the Republican governor reportedly having it under seal (hopefully all parts of the birth record), it makes me feel a little better.

Also, spending more than $1 million to protect something he already has doesn’t make a lot of sense. He MUST be the smartest man in the room with that kind of decision making... unless he really is hiding something...


41 posted on 11/26/2008 5:14:35 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Of course he has plenty to hide. His birth certificate has been altered, his family can’t agree on the hospital he was supposedly born in, his grandmother was in Kenya to witness his birth, his mother was 18 and not considered a legal adult in this country and at the time if your father was from Kenya you were never recognized as a legal born citizen. His mom got knocked up in Hawaii, he wasn’t born there!


42 posted on 11/26/2008 5:55:02 PM PST by ssgjim77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Bickell to Wrotnowski, “So you’re working with Donofrio, Polly want a cracker?!”


43 posted on 11/26/2008 7:48:08 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2

bttt


44 posted on 11/26/2008 8:09:02 PM PST by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
order Obama to provide documentation of intelligibility

LOL, he'll cough up his long form birth certificate before anything documenting his intelligibility can be cobbled together.

blush...

45 posted on 11/26/2008 9:08:47 PM PST by Sparticus (Libs, they're so open minded that their brains leaked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Throw that in with massive coordinated effort to ask for Republican Governors, SOS’s and Electors to demand more documented proof regarding Obama’s Natural Born Citizenship status, we’re about to hit a “tipping point” on this issue!
-

I HOPE YOU ARE RIGHT!! What can we do, if anything to help this along?


46 posted on 11/26/2008 9:16:47 PM PST by montesquiue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: koraz

There are increasing reports that Google is censoring this story.


47 posted on 11/26/2008 9:27:37 PM PST by EternalVigilance (AIPNEWS.com - America's Independent Party: "Peace through superior firepower!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
freekitty, as far as I can see, Free Republic, World Net Daily, and some blogs are the only place this is being discussed. The mainstream media, the conservative talk shows bigs (Rush, Hannity, Levin) are not discussing it. Basically, unless people come here, they won't know about it.
48 posted on 11/26/2008 9:29:06 PM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: montesquiue

Forget it!! I see above. Sorry. :p


49 posted on 11/26/2008 9:36:40 PM PST by montesquiue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Faith
You said:
“There should be a significant number of voters who would not have cast their ballot for Obama had they known he was not eligible under the Constitution.”
______________________________________________
It doesn't matter if they would or wouldn't have voted for BO.
It actually doesn't matter if they would still vote for BO today.
He is ineligible to serve. Can't even be considered.

The Constitution stands with or without agreement from the masses.
We live under the rule of law. Everyone equal. If I have to follow the law, so does BO, the SCOTUS, and every other elected leader.
No one should be able to break the law, even if the majority believe they should.

50 posted on 11/26/2008 9:46:23 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson