WROTNOWSKI V. CONNECTICUT SOS DOCKETED AT SUPREME COURT, DOCKET No. 08A469

US Supreme Court ^ | 11/26/08 | US Supreme Court

[BP2]

No. 08A469 Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State

Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date, Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. ----------------------------------------------------

[BP2]

>>> LOL, he’ll cough up his long form birth certificate before anything documenting his intelligibility can be cobbled together.

Maybe, but with the Republican governor reportedly having it under seal (hopefully all parts of the birth record), it makes me feel a little better.

Also, spending more than $1 million to protect something he already has doesn’t make a lot of sense. He MUST be the smartest man in the room with that kind of decision making... unless he really is hiding something...

[ssgjim77]

Of course he has plenty to hide. His birth certificate has been altered, his family can’t agree on the hospital he was supposedly born in, his grandmother was in Kenya to witness his birth, his mother was 18 and not considered a legal adult in this country and at the time if your father was from Kenya you were never recognized as a legal born citizen. His mom got knocked up in Hawaii, he wasn’t born there!

[Red Steel]

Bickell to Wrotnowski, “So you’re working with Donofrio, Polly want a cracker?!”

[SuperLuminal]

bttt

[Sparticus]

order Obama to provide documentation of intelligibility

LOL, he'll cough up his long form birth certificate before anything documenting his intelligibility can be cobbled together.

blush...

[montesquiue]

Throw that in with massive coordinated effort to ask for Republican Governors, SOS’s and Electors to demand more documented proof regarding Obama’s Natural Born Citizenship status, we’re about to hit a “tipping point” on this issue!
-

I HOPE YOU ARE RIGHT!! What can we do, if anything to help this along?

[EternalVigilance]

There are increasing reports that Google is censoring this story.

[Humal]

freekitty, as far as I can see, Free Republic, World Net Daily, and some blogs are the only place this is being discussed. The mainstream media, the conservative talk shows bigs (Rush, Hannity, Levin) are not discussing it. Basically, unless people come here, they won't know about it.

[montesquiue]

Forget it!! I see above. Sorry. :p

[Aurorales]

You said:
“There should be a significant number of voters who would not have cast their ballot for Obama had they known he was not eligible under the Constitution.”
______________________________________________
It doesn't matter if they would or wouldn't have voted for BO.
It actually doesn't matter if they would still vote for BO today.
He is ineligible to serve. Can't even be considered.

The Constitution stands with or without agreement from the masses.
We live under the rule of law. Everyone equal. If I have to follow the law, so does BO, the SCOTUS, and every other elected leader.
No one should be able to break the law, even if the majority believe they should.

[Aurorales]

I do understand what you are saying.
Many people can remember being taught who could be President.

It will be the ignorant and the kool-aid drinkers who will be screaming about “overturning the will of the people” if he is found ineligible.

[fishhound]

having the same experience...it’s strange.

[oprahstheantichrist]

"But where are the millions of Obamabots...?"

They were payrolled by Acorn. Not kidding.

[montesquieu]

http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com/2008/11/treason-at-scotus-bickell-guilty-of.html
-

This link has been removed. This has been happening to several blogs who are discussing this issue. We will NOT relent!! NEVER, NEVER, NEVER GIVE UP!!

[freekitty]

I know. I just hope these people that want to bury their heads remember all the hidden stuff we had to put up with the Clinton Administration. The fantasy movies they contrived as fact and unbeliveable lies we had to suffer through as well as the hidious acts President Clinton performed on women. Obama is no different from them. One huge ball faced lie. He is just wrapped in a slightly different package.

All we want is a good leader. One that leads; not hoodwinks.

[NewLand]

This link has been removed.

Actually, it hasn't. It clearly states: If you're a regular reader of this blog and are confident that the content is appropriate, feel free to click "Proceed" to proceed to the blog. We apologize for the inconvenience.

I clicked "proceed" and saw the blog.

[Humal]

“All we want is a good leader. One that leads; not hoodwinks.”

Well put. I agree.

[freepersup]

Thank you for posting this exceptional piece of news regarding the Obama ineligibility issue.

Now at SCOTUS: Berg, Donofrio, Nrotnowski, (coming soon) Keyes... who else? I intended to create a thread, but a search of the docket number poduced your work. Let's get the field agents chiming in with the gory details!

Freeper Detectives; report to your neighborhood precincts with keyboards in hand, ASAP!

[Semper911]

Back to the top

[mcshot]

I suspect a fair number do not even exist. So the number that will riot will be far less then projected. And if they riot it will be against our Country and Constitution which is not the place to be.