Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New lawsuit challenges Obama’s citizenship, win in (Washington) state
Tri-City Herald ^ | Dec. 4, 2008 | Herald staff

Posted on 12/05/2008 4:15:08 AM PST by FocusNexus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: Roccus
Sometimes I’m happy I’m old, not in the best of health and have no kids.

Even so, you still have to feel the same bad feeling that we are the last generation of the Great American Experiment. The snakes that we have as our governmental head are poisonous to Liberty, Justice and the old American way.

81 posted on 12/05/2008 9:08:48 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join the Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Here is the Constitution Party contact Page. Constitutional Eligibility should fit right in with their party name and identity. Send them all a note. Send a letter to the national headquarters and then to your state and regional office. Maybe, this is the issue to get them onto the national radar.

Constitution Party Contact Page

82 posted on 12/05/2008 9:13:07 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join the Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
I've always been interested in the intersection of law and kookdom. And these are frivolous lawsuits brought by kooks. I've been on the other side of a number of them (not necessarily political ones, however). I know 'em when I see 'em, and I like poking at 'em.

Also, as far as Obama and the State of Hawaii is concerned, the birth certificate is out there, and the document is, as it says on the bottom, prima facie proof of his birth in Hawaii (and was good enough for the State Department to issue him a passport). That a distinct number on the fringe won't accept it, for whatever reason, does not to my mind rebut that prima facie case. That's where we veer off into tinfoilhatland.

The Donofrio petition is laughable, but I will say it raises the academically interesting question of what did the Framers mean by "natural born citizen." I would not, however, agree with Donofrio's argument that because the 14th Amendment does not use the term "natural born citizen," that term necessarily excludes anyone born in the United States who has a non-citizen for one of his parents. I doubt that SCOTUS would agree, either, or would even consider the matter, let alone take the case and then construe that phrase in the manner suggested by Donofrio, thus overturning a presidential election.

83 posted on 12/05/2008 9:20:56 AM PST by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida
And these are frivolous lawsuits brought by kooks.

I assume you know all of these attorneys well and have evidence that they are "kooks?"

Or do you just engage in libel to have something to do?
84 posted on 12/05/2008 9:29:51 AM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: OBXWanderer
Having a daughter born in England of two Native Born US Citizens, I know for a fact that she is considered a Native Born Citizen.

One parent born in Santa Monica, California (with a public Birth Certificate) and one born in Grosse Pointe, Michigan (with a public Birth Certificate). End of story.

As long as both parents are US Citizens, the child is automatically a "Native Born US Citizen, regardless of the country of the actual birth.

85 posted on 12/05/2008 9:39:01 AM PST by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime time, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; torqemada; WKL815; Baumer; Robwin; Scutter; blasater1960; conservative cat; cherry; ...

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Say WA? Evergreen State ping

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.

Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

86 posted on 12/05/2008 10:26:31 AM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

I tuned in for that part of his show also. I was disgusted by his statement. It sounded transparently phoney,and like he was following the directives of someone of influence.


87 posted on 12/05/2008 10:33:31 AM PST by Katdaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

One does not have to be personally acquainted with them. Reading their pleadings and briefs is quite enough.


88 posted on 12/05/2008 10:58:38 AM PST by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida
I've always been interested in the intersection of law and kookdom. And these are frivolous lawsuits brought by kooks. I've been on the other side of a number of them (not necessarily political ones, however). I know 'em when I see 'em, and I like poking at 'em.

Also, as far as Obama and the State of Hawaii is concerned, the birth certificate is out there, and the document is, as it says on the bottom, prima facie proof of his birth in Hawaii (and was good enough for the State Department to issue him a passport). That a distinct number on the fringe won't accept it, for whatever reason, does not to my mind rebut that prima facie case. That's where we veer off into tinfoilhatland.

The Donofrio petition is laughable, but I will say it raises the academically interesting question of what did the Framers mean by "natural born citizen." I would not, however, agree with Donofrio's argument that because the 14th Amendment does not use the term "natural born citizen," that term necessarily excludes anyone born in the United States who has a non-citizen for one of his parents. I doubt that SCOTUS would agree, either, or would even consider the matter, let alone take the case and then construe that phrase in the manner suggested by Donofrio, thus overturning a presidential election.

Then how come Obama hires lawyers to keep anyone from seeing his birth certificate?
John McCain had some questions about his eligibility and whipped out his birth certificate and other proof very quickly
McCain was born in a military hospital either in the Canal Zone or just outside
This complicated matters

89 posted on 12/05/2008 11:39:37 AM PST by dennisw (Never bet on Islam! ::::: Never bet on a false prophet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

it seems to me that each state has the authority and duty and I wouldn’t be surprised if SCOTUS hot-potatoes this back down from national level to state level. A review of each states’ applicable laws are in order.

Also, I thought it curious that TeamObama recently announced they are already in the process of setting up forward offices in numerous states focused on targeting Secretary of State positions - odd announcement, odd timing, or connecting dots we don’t see yet?

best regards, blu

quick examples:

Alabama: no info on presidential, but senatorial and representive qualifications refer back to COTUS, Article 1.

Georgia: Each candidate is required to file an affidavit which states that he or she is eligible to
hold the office for which he or she is running. See O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-132 (e), 21-2-153(e).

Montana: Title 13: 13-10-404. Placement of candidate on primary ballot — methods of qualification. Before an individual intending to qualify as a presidential candidate may qualify for placement on the ballot, the individual shall qualify ....(2) The individual has submitted a declaration for nomination to the secretary of state pursuant to 13-10-201, and the secretary of state has determined, by the time that declarations for nomination are to be filed, that the individual is eligible to receive payments pursuant to the federal Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. 9031, et seq.

Oregon election law: Title 23: 246.046 Secretary of State and county clerks to seek out evidence of violations. The Secretary of State and each county clerk shall diligently seek out any evidence of violation of any election law. [Formerly 260.325]
and Chapter 249, 249.031 Contents of petition or declaration. (1) (f) A statement that the candidate will qualify if elected.

gleaned from FR threads, typical penalties:
California Election Code Section 18203, which states, “Any person who files or submits for filing a nomination paper or declaration of candidacy that it or any part of it has been made falsely is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months or two or three years or by both fine and imprisonment”.

California Elections Code Section 18500 that states,“Any person who commits fraud and any person who aids or abets fraud or attempts to aid or abet fraud, in connection with any vote cast, to be cast, or attempted to be cast, is guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment for 16 months or two or three years”.


90 posted on 12/06/2008 5:03:18 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson