Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Economy Headed for a Depression?
University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business ^ | December 05, 2008 | Professor Peter Morici

Posted on 12/05/2008 9:29:14 AM PST by mr_hammer

Today, the Labor Department reported the economy lost 533,000 payroll jobs in November, after losing 320,000 jobs in October and 403,000 jobs in September. This was much worse than was expected and represents wholesale capitulation. The threat of a widespread depression is now real and present.

The economy has shed 1.9 million jobs since December, as the full weight of the banking crisis, trade deficit with China and burdens imposed by high-priced imported oil are bearing down on manufacturing, construction and the broader economy with unrelenting pressure.

Unemployment increased to 6.7 percent in November; however, factoring in discouraged workers, unemployment is closer to 8.7percent. Add workers in part time positions that cannot find full time employment and the hidden unemployment rate is nearly 13 percent.

Recession or Depression?

The economy has been slowing since December 2007. The real question is whether the economy is in a recession or depression?

Recessions are like stock market corrections—after a time, equity prices rebound without government intervention. Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and stimulus tax rebates and spending have shortened the lives and eased the impact of post-World War II recessions, but those policies did not end them. The economy self corrected.

A depression is not self-correcting. Roosevelt Administration stimulus packages—huge deficit spending—eased the pain but failed to end the Great Depression. Roosevelt’s policies did not put the U.S. economy on a sustainable growth path, because New Deal policies worsened structural problems that pulled the economy down in the first place. For example, the New Deal proliferated monopoly pricing, extended the life of undersized farms, raised structural savings rates, and created a system of home lending too dependent on federally sponsored banks.

The challenges facing President-elect Barack Obama could not be clearer. The current economic slowdown has two structural causes—bad management practices at the large money center banks and the huge foreign trade deficit.

To accomplish lasting prosperity, President-elect Obama will have to fix the banks and the trade deficit. Obama must ensure that the banks use the trillions of dollars in federal bailout assistance to renegotiate mortgages and make new loans to worthy homebuyers and businesses. Obama must make certain that banks do not continue to squander federal largess by padding executive bonuses, acquiring other banks and pursuing new high-return, high-risk lines of businesses in merger activity, carbon trading and complex derivatives. Industry leaders like Citigroup have announced plans to move in those directions. Many of these bankers enjoyed influence in and contributed generously to the Obama campaign. Now it remains to be seen if a President Obama can stand up to these same bankers and persuade or compel them to act responsibly.

In addition, Obama must address the huge cost of imported oil and trade deficit with China or any effort to resurrect the economy is doomed to create massive foreign borrowing, another round of excessive consumer borrowing, and a second banking crisis that the Treasury and Federal Reserve will not be able to reverse.

Ultimately, reducing the oil import bill will require higher mileage standards for automobiles and assistance to automakers to accelerate the build out of alternative, high mileage vehicles. Fixing trade with China will require a tax on dollar-yuan transactions if China continues to refuse to stop subsidizing dollar purchases of yuan to prop up its exports and shift Chinese unemployment to the U.S. manufacturing sector.

Near term, a stimulus package focused on infrastructure is critical for resuscitating growth. The recent round of tax rebate checks ended up in savings accounts or spent at the Wal-Mart on Chinese goods, and did little to create jobs or accelerate growth. Whereas projects to repair roads, rehabilitate schools and refurbish public buildings would create high-paying jobs at home and provide a legacy in capital improvements that assist growth now and in the future.

However, stimulus spending, alone, won’t fix what’s broke. It didn’t end the Great Depression. Japan has had a succession of stimulus spending over the last two decades and that has failed to restore its economic dynamism. Similarly, President-elect Obama’s massive stimulus package, alone, won’t fix the U.S. economy. He must also reach into the management of the banks, and dramatically reduce U.S. dependence on imported oil and the trade deficit with China. The alternative is economic stagnation or worse, a depression.

Wages and Unemployment

In November, wages rose 7 cents per hour, or 0.4 percent. With labor markets weakening, pay raises will be more modest in the months ahead.

The unemployment rate was 6.7 percent in November, up from 6.5 percent in October. However, these numbers belie more fundamental weakness in the job market. Discouraged by a sluggish job market, many more adults are sitting on the sidelines, neither working nor looking for work, than when George Bush took the helm. Factoring in discouraged workers, who have left the workforce, and those forced into part time employment owing to the lack of full time work, the unemployment rate is about 12.8 percent.

During the presidential campaign, declining real wages and fewer adults working gave Barack Obama’s proposals to redistribute income through the tax system a lot of traction. However, those policies will do little to correct the fundamental systemic problems that are destroying good jobs and squeezing middle class families, even if they would make them feel better for a little while.

Going forward, solutions that create better jobs will require cutting the trade deficit by at least half to substantially boost domestic manufacturing, solving the problems of the large money center banks to get mortgage money flowing and housing construction going again, and energy policies that more aggressively develop alternative fuel sources, conserve oil, and open up new domestic fields for conventional oil and gas production. Reducing dependence on foreign oil requires doing all things environmentalists want us to do and all things environmentalists don’t want us to do.

Politically correct promises to create millions of new jobs producing alternative fuels makes effective presidential campaign slogans, but realistic policies for governing require aggressive development of more conventional oil and gas, as well as nonconventional energy sources, and efforts to improve the energy efficiency of personal transportation.

If the Democrats are not willing to drill for more oil off shore and take on the automobile industry’s resistance to significantly higher mileage vehicles, the U.S. economy will be even more indenture to Persian Gulf oil exporters at the end of President-elect Obama’s first term than it is today.

Finally, diplomacy has failed to redress the currency issue with China. If President Obama is not willing to take tough steps to redress the trade imbalance with China and reduce oil imports, together the Persian Gulf oil exporters and China’s sovereign wealth funds may be able to buy the New York stock exchange eight years from now. Americans, outside those working for the New York banks that facilitate this sellout, will find their best futures waiting on tables for Middle East and Chinese tourists.

Manufacturing, Construction and the Quality of Jobs

Going forward, the economy will add some jobs for college graduates with technical specialties in finance, health care, education, and engineering. However, for high school graduates without specialized technical skills or training and for college graduates with only liberal arts diplomas, jobs offering good pay and benefits remain tough to find. For those workers, who compose about half the working population, the quality of jobs continues to spiral downward.

Historically, manufacturing and construction offered workers with only a high school education the best pay, benefits and opportunities for skill attainment and advancement. Troubles in these industries push ordinary workers into retailing, hospitality and other industries where pay often lags.

Construction employment fell by 163,000 in November. This is a terrible indicator for future GDP growth. Retailing shed 91,000 thousand jobs, and financial services lost 20,000 jobs.

Manufacturing has lost 85,000 jobs, and over the last 104 months, manufacturing has shed more than four million jobs. The trade deficit with China and other Asia exporters are the major culprits.

The dollar is too strong against the Chinese yuan, Japanese yen and other Asian currencies. The Chinese government intervenes in foreign exchange markets to suppress the value of the yuan to gain competitive advantages for Chinese exports, and the yuan sets the pattern for other Asian currencies. Similarly, Beijing subsidizes fuel prices and increasingly requires U.S. manufacturers to make products in China to sell there.

Ending Chinese currency market manipulation and other mercantilist practices are critical to reducing the non-oil U.S. trade deficit, and instigating a recovery in U.S. employment in manufacturing and technology-intensive services that compete in trade. Neither President Bush nor Congressional leaders like Charles Rangel and Chuck Schumer have been willing to seriously challenge China on this issue, and Senators McCain and Obama appeared comfortable with continuing their approaches during the campaign.

Now President-elect Barack Obama must alter his position, and get behind a policy to reverse the trade imbalance with China, or preside over the wholesale destruction of many more U.S. manufacturing jobs. These losses have little to do with free trade based on comparative advantage. Instead, they deprive Americans of jobs in industries where they are truly internationally competitive.

In the end, without assertive steps to fix trade with China, as well as fix the banks and curtail oil imports, the Bush years will seem like a walk through the park compared to the real income losses Americans will suffer during the Obama years.

Instead, were the trade deficit cut in half and the banks fixed, manufacturing would recoup at least 2 million jobs, U.S. growth would exceed 3.5 percent a year. Real wages and domestic savings would climb, and the federal government would receive more revenues to balance its budget or address other pressing domestic needs.

The choices for the new president are simple. It’s either renaissance or decline. Fix the banks, trade with China and energy policy or become America’s Nero.

Peter Morici is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Business and former Chief Economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: business; economy; recession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2008 9:29:14 AM PST by mr_hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
1-20-2009

Depression declared over! Economy soars!

2 posted on 12/05/2008 9:32:57 AM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

It’s shaping up to be a long severe recession. The more the government misallocates capital and throws new and greater debt after old and bad, the more likely we will face depression.


3 posted on 12/05/2008 9:33:08 AM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

It’s certainly possible.

Putting a Marxist know-nothing into the presidency certainly won’t help things.


4 posted on 12/05/2008 9:33:33 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

I think we are there now and gaining momentum as $40 trillion of global derivatives bought with borrowed money evaporates.


5 posted on 12/05/2008 9:34:00 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

Anybody know of an online economist article that explains why endless massive government borrowing will help with this, beyond political. Can all this borrowed and printed cash really jumpstart anything? I know MSM says we have to do it or else.


6 posted on 12/05/2008 9:34:55 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama says: "I only need to buy 40% of voters with handouts and trick another 11%")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes

All this makes me think we should all study the Wealth of Nations again (maybe the first time for most)


7 posted on 12/05/2008 9:35:06 AM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

more whining by academics

AMERICA IS BY FAR THE STRONGEST AND GREATEST NATION ON EARTH

The only issues going on now is we are correcting the FRAUD THE HAS BEEN PERPATRATED ON US

FRAUD in the banking sector
FRAUD in the housing sector
FRAUD in the Oil prices
FRAUD in government’

and furthermore the UNIONS WHO ARE RUINING MY STATE (Ca) and the US Automakers and OUR SCHOOLS MUST BE BROKEN

WE NEED TO CLEAN HOUSE AND GET BACK TO OUR ROOTS

HARD WORK
THRIFT
INDEPENDENCE
RESPONSIBILITY

THIS NANNY STATE BULLS*** MUST GO AS WELL

GOOD LUCK SEEING THIS HAPPEN WITH THE GUVMINT WE HAVE

/ RANT


8 posted on 12/05/2008 9:36:38 AM PST by kauaiboy (Obama is a a far left marxist Islamosfascist Chicago thug manchurian plant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

President Bush earlier stated that America was in a recession.


9 posted on 12/05/2008 9:36:59 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Americans should lead America, its the right way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
Gold Prices
10 posted on 12/05/2008 9:37:12 AM PST by Dallas59 (Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

I believe “recession” is a technical term, based on specific statistics whereas “depression” is a sujective term.

Technical: She’s ugly
Subjective: She’s butt-ugly.


11 posted on 12/05/2008 9:41:14 AM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in the 1930's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

I believe a depression is a recession the government fixed.


12 posted on 12/05/2008 9:43:21 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

Good report. Keep up your chin guys. Conservatives who live by their principles will still prosper in this economy (just look at how red states are doing versus blue states).


13 posted on 12/05/2008 9:45:04 AM PST by DiogenesLaertius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kauaiboy
One way to help things would be to completely abolish the current tax system and the IRS.

Give us a flat tax or fair tax. LOTS OF PROBLEMS SOLVED!

14 posted on 12/05/2008 9:47:11 AM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
" Can all this borrowed and printed cash really jumpstart anything? I know MSM says we have to do it or else."

Sure that's the way to fix the problem! As this diabolical scam unfolds, try to keep in mind who started it. Then pay particular attention to who is supporting more of the same to cure what they caused.

15 posted on 12/05/2008 9:48:42 AM PST by An Old Man (Lead, Follow, or get the hell out of the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

It’s a depression that’s coming...


16 posted on 12/05/2008 9:50:54 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

For some people yes, for others no.


17 posted on 12/05/2008 9:51:10 AM PST by gogov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kauaiboy

How right you are!! Check out ‘market-ticker.denninger.net’. It’s going to be bad, very bad if the market is not allowed to correct itself.


18 posted on 12/05/2008 9:51:45 AM PST by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
IMO, the US is headed for an extended somewhat deep recession that will last five plus years. A depression is possible if some external event occurs such as a major terrorist attack on US soil. Of course if you are worried about losing your job, it is a recession. If you have lost your job it is a depression. Semantics you know!
19 posted on 12/05/2008 9:52:02 AM PST by buckalfa (confused and bewildered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
One of the best things Obama could do is let Rangel use his get-out-of-jail-free card and start cutting both corporate and personal income taxes. The fastest growing economy on the planet right now is Ireland. Oddly, it also has the lowest corporate tax rate. How many European companies would set up offices here if we had a 10% corporate tax rate? Does Obama really think that threatening the rich (who create jobs in the first place) is going to help our economic system? Did he miss the fact that the largest single day swing in the stock market happened right after he was elected? Who does he think such market swings reflects, the poor? Hell no, it shows what the people who create jobs in this country think things are going to be like once he takes office.

Rangel and the other bozos in Washington don't get it. Corporations don't pay taxes, the people buying their products pay taxes. Stimulus checks like we saw last summer are a joke, because they do nothing to alter the demand for durable goods, like home and cars. The big ticket items are unaffected by such voting-getting schemes. Permanent tax cuts are needed to induce consumers to alter long run consumption plans. Make a permanent tax cut and suddenly that new home, car, or college education becomes possible. Higher take home pay means it's possible to fund a little more debt for cars, homes, education, etc.

The best thing Obama could do is cut taxes permanently for all income levels, especially the rich since the top 10% pay 66% of the tax burden as it is. The cut corporate tax rates. After that, Mr. Obama, just stand back and watch how the system fixes itself.

20 posted on 12/05/2008 9:53:36 AM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson