Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Barack Obama's Kenyan father makes him ineligible to be President
Michelle Malkin's ^ | Dec 5th 2008 | rotarymunkey

Posted on 12/06/2008 9:32:07 AM PST by dennisw

 

 

 
On December 5th, 2008 at 1:53 pm, rotarymunkey said:

Ronald Reagan said “Trust, but verify.”

1. Barack Obama II, the Senator, was born of a British subject and an American citizen. Period. This grants him, at birth, Dual Citizenship.

2. “Natural-Born” is codified as meaning “born of two U.S. Citizens on U.S. soil”. Period.

By these standards, set forth by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and by treaty with Britain, Barack Obama II is not, and can never be, a “Natural-born citizen”.

This is the core of Donofrio’s case, and it’s based in solid law, which is why Justice Thomas saw merit in reviewing it. If they do not rule on this case, it opens the door to a host of lawsuits claiming later that any law signed by a President Obama could be challenged in court. They have to rule on it, although they do not necessarily have to find in Donofrio’s favor.

It is misleading for Michelle to associate Donofrio’s case with Berg’s as she attempts to discredit Donofrio with Berg’s nutroots blathering about 9/11. Donofrio doesn’t ask for Obama’s State of Hawaii Birth Certificate because it isn’t needed. He has instead, challenged the certification of Barack Obama as a candidate by the Secretary of State in New Jersey. And, on this point, he’s right. As a citizen of that state he has the right to challenge on this point. Michelle’s misconstruence of the various points involved is NOT typical of her thorough reporting. In essence, she fired from the hip like the MSM is doing currently on this issue. Ed over at Hot Air did the same thing yesterday.

If 4 of the 9 justices agree to hear this case, they might issue a stay on the vote of the Electoral College in order to have time to hear both sides of the case fully, which makes it VERY BIG NEWS indeed.

Donofrio also points out, correctly, that John McCain is not a “Natural-Born Citizen” either, as the base where he was born was NOT U.S. soil, as per the military’s own definition. Yes, both of McCain’s parents were U.S. Citizens at the time of his birth, but the Constitution and immigration law is quite clear in stating that “U.S. soil” is a hard and fast requirement. Evidently the base in Panama was leased, which makes ownership of the land Panamanian. Their citizenship does, however, make him an “American citizen”. He is not “Natural-Born”.

This is NOT a conspiracy theory. It is Constitutional law, which falls under the purveyance of SCOTUS. Judge Thomas would not, as a conservative, I believe, hold a grudge against Sen. Obama for his comments during the campaign. The fact of the matter is, Sen. Obama is not eligible, by nature of his British birthright, for the Presidency of the United States.

Everything in his life which came after his birth is moot.

Reagan had it right… “Trust, but verify.”

_______________________________
_______________________________

On December 5th, 2008 at 2:52 pm, rotarymunkey said:

I’ve got to say that I did a LOT of reading yesterday. I was following Berg’s case to SCOTUS, and was unaware of the others, including Donofrio. I must have read somewhere around 1000 comments on a few different websites, with opinions running both ways. Legalese is a formidable language but Donofrio’s website does a good job of distilling the basics of the case.

One comment was a little disturbing though. Evidently in light of Donofrio’s council today at SCOTUS, there are some Secretaries of State around the country now looking into this matter on a CYA basis! If they are proven culpable for having not properly done their job and independently vetted each candidate, then there could be serious legal or professional employment repercussions. For public employees in a rough market, losing one’s job is scary to contemplate.

On the other hand, there’s Kool-aid drinker Sen. Mel Martinez claiming that Sen. Obama was vetted twice, once in the Primaries, and once in the General Election, by the People, of all things! Could a stupider statement be uttered by an elected official? Clearly he does not understand the issue at heart.

Donofrio’s case began quite some time ago and has slowly worked its way up through Mr. Donofrio’s persistance and knowledgeable application of the law. For a retiree, he’s doing pretty damn well up to this point.

If SCOTUS decides to hear this case, this will go down as one of the most important points in American History.

The only thing Barack Obama could possibly do at this point is to release a Birth Certificate showing that Obama Sr. was not really his dad. I’ve looked at the family photos; that’s just not possible. Sen. Obama’s appearance is a chip off the old block for sure.

For any of the other numerous cases (I’ve read 15, but haven’t researched that number yet) to be heard, this one single point must first be decided. It doesn’t matter that he later held a Kenyan citizenship, or was adopted by an Indonesian parent, or traveled to Pakistan on someone’s NON-US-ISSUED passport (a violation of his US Citizenship, by law too). None of that matters one whit if the court finds that he truly has, by right of birth, British Citizenship.

As Michelle Obama famously said, “I’m not aware of any law which would prevent my husband from being President.” I guess an Ivy League law degree doesn’t buy as much as it used to, eh?

Did anyone else note that the Factcheck.org COLB lists his mother’s MAIDEN name, not her “married” name on it? Two or three photos farther down, the newspaper notice of birth lists “Mr and Mrs. Barack Obama” and was supposedly posted by Ann’s white parents. Would white parents in 1961 be thrilled enough to list their daughter as married to a black man, or was the COLB in fact, correct in listing them as UNMARRIED? How many millions of people have looked at these photos now and NOT noticed this inconsistency?

It doesn’t matter in the end. British law bequeaths citizenship through the father. It’s just one more point which shows that someone didn’t cross all their “t”s or dot their “i”s properly during the creation of the COLB.

If it is indeed ruled that Barack Obama is a Dual Citizenship person, then does his misbehavior, and that of those around him become a matter which could/would/should be investigated by the FBI?

The FBI which WOULD have the power to open his sealed records in order to ascertain exactly WHY they were sealed in the first place? $650 million dollars in campaign donations is a LOT of fraudulent money!

 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; choomgang; colb; kenya; obama; obamafamily; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
I see a logical argument here so I respectfully submit this to Freeperdom to tear it apart

BTW This guy says John McCain was ineligible too. Could not be President.

1 posted on 12/06/2008 9:32:08 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw
On December 5th, 2008 at 1:53 pm, rotarymunkey said:

Ronald Reagan said “Trust, but verify.”

1. Barack Obama II, the Senator, was born of a British subject and an American citizen. Period. This grants him, at birth, Dual Citizenship.

2. “Natural-Born” is codified as meaning “born of two U.S. Citizens on U.S. soil”. Period.

By these standards, set forth by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and by treaty with Britain, Barack Obama II is not, and can never be, a “Natural-born citizen”.

This is the core of Donofrio’s case, and it’s based in solid law, which is why Justice Thomas saw merit in reviewing it. If they do not rule on this case, it opens the door to a host of lawsuits claiming later that any law signed by a President Obama could be challenged in court. They have to rule on it, although they do not necessarily have to find in Donofrio’s favor.

It is misleading for Michelle to associate Donofrio’s case with Berg’s as she attempts to discredit Donofrio with Berg’s nutroots blathering about 9/11. Donofrio doesn’t ask for Obama’s State of Hawaii Birth Certificate because it isn’t needed. He has instead, challenged the certification of Barack Obama as a candidate by the Secretary of State in New Jersey. And, on this point, he’s right. As a citizen of that state he has the right to challenge on this point. Michelle’s misconstruence of the various points involved is NOT typical of her thorough reporting. In essence, she fired from the hip like the MSM is doing currently on this issue. Ed over at Hot Air did the same thing yesterday.

If 4 of the 9 justices agree to hear this case, they might issue a stay on the vote of the Electoral College in order to have time to hear both sides of the case fully, which makes it VERY BIG NEWS indeed.

Donofrio also points out, correctly, that John McCain is not a “Natural-Born Citizen” either, as the base where he was born was NOT U.S. soil, as per the military’s own definition. Yes, both of McCain’s parents were U.S. Citizens at the time of his birth, but the Constitution and immigration law is quite clear in stating that “U.S. soil” is a hard and fast requirement. Evidently the base in Panama was leased, which makes ownership of the land Panamanian. Their citizenship does, however, make him an “American citizen”. He is not “Natural-Born”.

This is NOT a conspiracy theory. It is Constitutional law, which falls under the purveyance of SCOTUS. Judge Thomas would not, as a conservative, I believe, hold a grudge against Sen. Obama for his comments during the campaign. The fact of the matter is, Sen. Obama is not eligible, by nature of his British birthright, for the Presidency of the United States.

Everything in his life which came after his birth is moot.

Reagan had it right… “Trust, but verify.”

_______________________________
_______________________________

On December 5th, 2008 at 2:52 pm, rotarymunkey said:

I’ve got to say that I did a LOT of reading yesterday. I was following Berg’s case to SCOTUS, and was unaware of the others, including Donofrio. I must have read somewhere around 1000 comments on a few different websites, with opinions running both ways. Legalese is a formidable language but Donofrio’s website does a good job of distilling the basics of the case.

One comment was a little disturbing though. Evidently in light of Donofrio’s council today at SCOTUS, there are some Secretaries of State around the country now looking into this matter on a CYA basis! If they are proven culpable for having not properly done their job and independently vetted each candidate, then there could be serious legal or professional employment repercussions. For public employees in a rough market, losing one’s job is scary to contemplate.

On the other hand, there’s Kool-aid drinker Sen. Mel Martinez claiming that Sen. Obama was vetted twice, once in the Primaries, and once in the General Election, by the People, of all things! Could a stupider statement be uttered by an elected official? Clearly he does not understand the issue at heart.

Donofrio’s case began quite some time ago and has slowly worked its way up through Mr. Donofrio’s persistance and knowledgeable application of the law. For a retiree, he’s doing pretty damn well up to this point.

If SCOTUS decides to hear this case, this will go down as one of the most important points in American History.

The only thing Barack Obama could possibly do at this point is to release a Birth Certificate showing that Obama Sr. was not really his dad. I’ve looked at the family photos; that’s just not possible. Sen. Obama’s appearance is a chip off the old block for sure.

For any of the other numerous cases (I’ve read 15, but haven’t researched that number yet) to be heard, this one single point must first be decided. It doesn’t matter that he later held a Kenyan citizenship, or was adopted by an Indonesian parent, or traveled to Pakistan on someone’s NON-US-ISSUED passport (a violation of his US Citizenship, by law too). None of that matters one whit if the court finds that he truly has, by right of birth, British Citizenship.

As Michelle Obama famously said, “I’m not aware of any law which would prevent my husband from being President.” I guess an Ivy League law degree doesn’t buy as much as it used to, eh?

Did anyone else note that the Factcheck.org COLB lists his mother’s MAIDEN name, not her “married” name on it? Two or three photos farther down, the newspaper notice of birth lists “Mr and Mrs. Barack Obama” and was supposedly posted by Ann’s white parents. Would white parents in 1961 be thrilled enough to list their daughter as married to a black man, or was the COLB in fact, correct in listing them as UNMARRIED? How many millions of people have looked at these photos now and NOT noticed this inconsistency?

It doesn’t matter in the end. British law bequeaths citizenship through the father. It’s just one more point which shows that someone didn’t cross all their “t”s or dot their “i”s properly during the creation of the COLB.

If it is indeed ruled that Barack Obama is a Dual Citizenship person, then does his misbehavior, and that of those around him become a matter which could/would/should be investigated by the FBI?

The FBI which WOULD have the power to open his sealed records in order to ascertain exactly WHY they were sealed in the first place? $650 million dollars in campaign donations is a LOT of fraudulent money!


2 posted on 12/06/2008 9:33:45 AM PST by dennisw (Never bet on Islam! ::::: Never bet on a false prophet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Obama's bin lying about virtually his entire life, including his upbrining. Sooner or later it will all catch up to him.

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S UPBRINGING

3 posted on 12/06/2008 9:34:15 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Lets roll!

pictures please.


4 posted on 12/06/2008 9:37:16 AM PST by stockpirate (Democrat Syndrome, psychological disorder that makes victims loyal to their abusers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
This guy says John McCain was ineligible too. Could not be President.

So does this mean we'll have another election?

5 posted on 12/06/2008 9:38:26 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
BTW This guy says John McCain was ineligible too. Could not be President.

McCain's BC was cleared as legit in the courts long ago.

6 posted on 12/06/2008 9:39:10 AM PST by maine-iac7 ("He has the right to criticize who has the heart to help" Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
This guy says John McCain was ineligible too. Could not be President.

Wasn't John born on a military base in Panama to American parents? Then there shouldn't be any doubts about John's citizenship...

I'm been hearing a lot about the question of Obama's citizenship. Let's suppose this issue was before the Supreme Court... and they ruled... since Obama cannot prove his citizenship he will be stripped of the Presidency... what happens next? John becomes President? Or the Senate which is controlled by the Democrats decide? Does this mean Hillary still has a chance?

7 posted on 12/06/2008 9:39:43 AM PST by John123 (The US may be going down the drain, but everyone else will drown first...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
“Natural-Born” is codified as meaning “born of two U.S. Citizens on U.S. soil”. Period.

Show me.

8 posted on 12/06/2008 9:40:31 AM PST by Jim Noble (I have read a fiery gospel, writ in burnished rows of steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
“I’m not aware of any law which would prevent my husband from being President.” I guess an Ivy League law degree doesn’t buy as much as it used to, eh?

No.

It just means they aren't going to let any law stop them.

9 posted on 12/06/2008 9:40:34 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I think this guy makes a lot of sense. The most I have read so far. I listened to Leo D. last night and he is very clear in making his points.


10 posted on 12/06/2008 9:41:40 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Jeff Head

Thanks guys. Anything that brings more clarity to this issue, is good.

Nice catch DennisW. Nice work Jeff.


11 posted on 12/06/2008 9:42:21 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Okay lefties... the problem with wanting something, is that you sometimes get it. Good luck now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Thank you for your clarity and work for us.

I’m am keeping your post for future reference.


12 posted on 12/06/2008 9:43:13 AM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John123
Wasn't John born on a military base in Panama to American parents? Then there shouldn't be any doubts about John's citizenship...

This guy says the military base was on Panamanian soil leased by the United States

#2 I have no reference but I think I read that McCain was born in a Panamanian hospital off the base. That would definitely be foreign soil

13 posted on 12/06/2008 9:44:13 AM PST by dennisw (Never bet on Islam! ::::: Never bet on a false prophet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

BHO will shift to Plan B. Let’s see, how many US citizens were rumored to be his father? Maybe that is the reason his BC is hidden?


14 posted on 12/06/2008 9:44:53 AM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Of possible interest to your list.


15 posted on 12/06/2008 9:45:48 AM PST by Slings and Arrows ("If one cannot learn from the mistakes of others, one might as well become a Democrat."--E. Friesner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

I believe that’s why the SCOTUS see merit in Leo’s case. It would not be right if they pushed it aside for political reasons.


16 posted on 12/06/2008 9:45:59 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

MM “And they accuse anyone who disagrees with them of being part and parcel of the grand plan to install Emperor Obama and usurp the rule of law.” at link:

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/12/05/truthers-to-the-left-of-me-truthers-to-the-right/comment-page-2/#comments

File this under “Going no where” fast. This would be poison if it was going someplace. Are some of us so Desperate now we think we can NEVER win elections again to do this?


17 posted on 12/06/2008 9:47:24 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama says: "I only need to buy 40% of voters with handouts and trick another 11%")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

What court? McCain probably in not naturalized and is probably not eligible and Obama is surely not eligble. McCain should have known and should not have run. Because of him, we did not get a more conservative candidate. We essentially got two frauds in the election. We might have gotten Fred Thompson or Mitt. Mitt is not a conservative but he is more conservative than McCain.

McCain showed his normal stripes sucking up to Obama after the election with his RINO pal Lindsay Graham.

Also McCain’s stupid McCain-Feingold law hurt him in the election. McCain’s service in the military was incredibly honorable, his RINO actions in the Senate have been disgraceful.


18 posted on 12/06/2008 9:48:29 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7; dennisw
McCain's BC was cleared as legit in the courts long ago.

The point he was making about McCain had nothing to do with the BC, but rather with the definition of "natural born": both parents citizens (yes), born on U.S. soil (no).

At this point, to prevent blood on the streets, the Supremes just might have to declare the Constitution unconstitutional.

19 posted on 12/06/2008 9:49:31 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (ACORN is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
See Defining Natural-Born Citizen
20 posted on 12/06/2008 9:49:36 AM PST by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson