Skip to comments.Obama picks RIAA's favorite lawyer for a top Justice post
Posted on 01/06/2009 7:17:53 PM PST by Notary Sojac
As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama won applause from legal adversaries of the recording industry. Stanford law professor Larry Lessig, the doyen of the "free culture" movement, endorsed the Illinois senator, as did Google CEO Eric Schmidt and even the Pirate Party.
That was then. As president-elect, one of Obama's first tech-related decisions has been to select the Recording Industry Association of America's favorite lawyer to be the third in command at the Justice Department. And Obama's pick as deputy attorney general, the second most senior position, is the lawyer who oversaw the defense of the Copyright Term Extension Act--the same law that Lessig and his allies unsuccessfully sued to overturn.
Obama made both announcements on Monday, saying that his picks "bring the integrity, depth of experience and tenacity that the Department of Justice demands in these uncertain times." The soon-to-be-appointees: Tom Perrelli for associate attorney general and David Ogden for deputy attorney general.
Campaign rhetoric aside, this should be no surprise. Obama's selection of Joe Biden as vice president showed that the presidential hopeful was comfortable with someone with firmly pro-RIAA views. Biden urged the criminal prosecutions of copyright-infringing peer-to-peer users and tried to create a new federal felony involving playing unauthorized music.
Perrelli is currently a partner in the Washington offices of Jenner and Block, where he represented the RIAA in a a slew of cases, including a high-profile bid to unmask file sharers without the requirement of a judge reviewing the evidence first. Verizon initially lost to the RIAA, but eventually prevailed in 2003 when a federal appeals court ruled the record labels' strategy under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was unlawful.
Perrelli has represented the RIAA in other lawsuits against individual file sharers. One filed in Michigan accuses a university student of distributing "hundreds of sound recordings over his system without the authorization of the copyright owners." A lawsuit against a Princeton University student makes similar arguments; Perrelli and his colleagues also tried to force Charter Communications to give up the names of 93 file-trading subscribers.
A 2004 summary of a Boston lawsuit written by Harvard's Berkman Center--which opposed the RIAA in this and a current case--quotes Perrelli as telling a federal judge that it would be easy to determine who was using a wireless network to share music. "It is correct that the actual downloader may be someone else in the household," he said, but any errors can be determined easily after a "modest amount of discovery."
An article on his law firm's Web site says that Perrelli represented SoundExchange before the Copyright Royalty Board--and obtained a 250 percent increase in the royalty rate for music played over the Internet by companies like AOL and Yahoo. Perrelli previously worked in the Clinton Justice Department.
An article in Legal Times titled "Building an Entertainment Beast in D.C." says that in 2002, Perrelli used Jenner's reputation as an appellate law firm to "get a meeting with officials at the RIAA, at a time when Internet file-sharing entities like Napster were threatening the music business." A year later, in 2003, the law firm recruited Steven Fabrizio, previously the RIAA's senior vice president for business and legal affairs, and business began booming (the RIAA also used the Jenner law firm to write a friend-of-the-court brief in the copyright extension lawsuit).
If confirmed by the Senate, which is unlikely to pose much of a hurdle, Perrelli would oversee the department's civil division, the antitrust division, and the civil rights division.
Obama's choice for deputy attorney general--the second-in-command at Justice--is David Ogden, who's currently a partner at the WilmerHale law firm.
As assistant attorney general for the civil division, Ogden was responsible for organizing the defense of the Child Online Protection Act, or COPA, an antiporn law that has been challenged by the ACLU in court for more than a decade with no resolution. His department also successfully defended the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Ogden's biography at Wilmer Hale says only that he represents the "media and Internet industries, as well as major trade and professional associations," without listing details. The Justice Department, barring exceptional cases, has a duty to defend laws enacted by Congress.
Perrelli, on the other hand, went out of his way to recruit the RIAA as a very lucrative client: his law firm bills some partners' time at a princely $1,000 an hour.
During his confirmation hearing, it will be instructive to see if senators ask whether his zealous anti-file sharing advocacy can make him an objective civil servant--especially when these same politicians want the Justice Department to sue peer-to-peer pirates at taxpayer's expense. (Then again, if that proposal becomes law, Perrelli's surely the right man for the job.)
It will also be instructive to see if this week's news prompts some of the RIAA's longtime adversaries to moderate their enthusiasm for Obama's technology policies.
Two weeks left to use PirateBay. News groups are looking more attractive by the minute. lol
What is RIAA?
Oh my! The free sharemusic downloaders are gonna FREAK!
This guy is like Public Enemy Number One them.
We all knew this guy was all about PAYOLA
He is a Chicago Pol
I use Mininova and he’s only THIRD in command at DOJ, so no panic for me. A lot of freeware groups will surely challenge this hack and bring the case to the SC if they ever want to challenge peer-to-peer downloads.
I thought piratebay was already gone
Oh /. is gonna be comedy gold for sure.
I miss Audiogalaxy. I downloaded tons of great old recordings from that back in the day. And it was through an open browser, didn’t have to use PtoP.
It should also make the front page of Digg, with the caption, “Good job Diggers.”
Found on Slashdot posted by Larry Bagina:
Obama wants to change the system. But in order to do that, he needs insiders, clinton retreads, lobbyists, and big corporate stooges that know how to get shit done. Once he's surrounded by them, he'll be able to change the system.
It’s going to be hilarious when thousands of young liberals who campaigned for Obama and promoted Obama and voted for Obama start being sued for thousands of dollars for copyright infringements by the same administration they voted for! FOOLS!
On the other hand, lawyers basically do what they're told. They aren't bound to any ideology other than the Deep Pocket ideology.
Your realize that this is quintissential leftist delusion, don't you?
When we recall that Joe Biden is also pro-RIAA, I'm bettuing that now that we can no longer use Guantanamo for terrorists, the new administration will fill it with music downloaders.
nope, and demonoid came back as well
yeah, that was the best ever.
Changing the system from within.
marking for later.
Well, I’ll be!
Demoniod is great for obscure rock.
I sure miss Bluegrassbox.com
you’re joking, right?
DRM was such a POS idea, but I doubt its dead
I thought that was an old lefty tactic.
AG was my download site of choice too. Myspace more recently worked the same way, but they’ve had to change their format around.
property rights and all; who needs ‘em, right?
I haven't tried to use it in so long, I wouldn't know. lol
Ive had this argument 1000 times.
If I buy an lp or tape like 5 times and it wears out due to planned obsolescence or shoddy product, I dont feel real bad about dloading a facsimile of what I HAVE PAID FOR OVER AND OVER, THAT ONLY MEETS 1/1OTH THE AURAL QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL
I live by limewire. ‘course, I’ve never downloaded something I would have bought. I am usually downloading something that is not copyrighted or something I already own on vinyl, tape or CD.
But I don’t expect this to have any impact anyway.
Change you can believe in!
Now RIAA wishes will be DOJ policy. Thanks, Obama.
I am wondering if you ever heard of the word "sarcasm."
It usually announces itself.
Well, this is dry and wry.. from a guy who just sees the great big hypocrite horses tail section who was elected by so many who believed he wasn't the biggest pawn of the "system" that ever existed.
Obama's record has been continuously one of voting present except when it was time to take a moral stand, then you could be sure he would pick the wrong stand.
Anyway, over on Slashdot folks are doing the old Ha Ha...and this was one of the most cutting I have seen.
Now if you see the RIAA as law and justice, I guess you might say folks who think their blackmail tactics stink are leftists.. but frankly.. their tactics stink. Worse, Copyright has become something that is in complete defiance of what was intended by the framers.
Thomas Jefferson didn’t even believe in copyrights.
There was a controversy, but there is a place for copyrights and there are reasons for setting the period of protection to a long period of time, but it should be limited and less than the lifetime of a human.
I’ll be rubbing this in the nose of an Obama supporter who hates the RIAA later. He’s more sophisticated than slashdot, he’s a kuro5hin.org type.
This ought to be fun.
What about that website Obama's been running? Does it have a way to mod this guy down?
It is very much different than here on Slashdot.
You get moderator points only once every 4 years.
Everyone gets moderator points at the same time.
You only get 1 moderator point.
It lasts only 1 day (half actually).
You get to moderate posts of only 2 posters.
Rest of those 4 years all your posts are automatically moderated as -1 Overrated+Troll, and nobody reads them.
But if you happen to have a s**tload of money - you can buy yourself golden undemoteable +5 Insightful+Informative posts.
Clearly posted by one of the few undaunted conservatives (in whose company I count myself) on Slashdot.
The US Constitution says for limited times. When copyrights were first enacted in America they were for 14 years and another 14 years if you renewed. Then public domain forever. The way today’s laws have been going copyrights can last for 150 years or more. Several generations. That’s completely unConstitutional.
I know we've joked about the Cult of Obama, but this is classic cult psychology. A disappointment with the predictions of the cult (that Obama will bring "change") does not come with disillusionment, but with rationalization and even an increased adherence to the cult.
I might agree with your sentiment if music were actually property.
Right there was one of Jefferson's practical objections to copyright. He knew that the power of monopoly is dangerous and would in time be abused, but Madison thought the will of the people would prevent that abuse. Guess who was right.
I think this guy thoroughly understands our system.