Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does Leon Panetta Know About TWA 800
cashill.com ^ | 1/8/2008 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 01/08/2009 8:18:40 PM PST by Sioux-san

Last week, I received an email from a former 747 pilot named Thomas Young.

In early August 1996, Young explained, he was laid up in a Hong Kong hospital with a back injury. His employer, Polar Air Cargo, flew his wife Barbara out to join him. They had little else to do but watch TV. Here is what they saw.

The videotape began with people milling about on a deck facing a body of water. In the background, a streak of†light can be seen leaving a point below the edge of the deck, accelerating as it climbed; it passed behind what appeared to me to be a thin cloud layer and continued upward out of the frame, from right to left. As the streak of light disappeared beyond the edge of the frame, after a slight pause, there is a generalized, dim flash on the upper left side of the screen, followed by a brighter and more pronounced flash.

Some 270 eyewitnesses on Long Island would give formal accounts to the FBI of the same event--an apparent missile attack on TWA Flight 800 on the night of July 17,1996. Scores of them would provide detailed drawings.

“The TWA 800 story was big news,” Young explains, “and was getting top billing in the Asian press.”

Young had a distinct perspective on what he was seeing. For six years in the 1980s he had worked at Boeing, much of that time in its Space and Strategic Missile Systems Division.... Given the TV reception in his Hong Kong hospital, Young could not identify the type of missile that took out TWA Flight 800, but he was confident he was seeing a missile.

“If this was a Navy missile,” Barbara recalls her husband telling her at the time, “there goes Clinton’s re-election.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cashill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cashill; cia; fbi; panetta; tinfoil; twa800; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Sioux-san

Adding an older link related to “the video”

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57375


41 posted on 01/08/2009 9:02:35 PM PST by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san
I have heard from at least a hundred individuals who saw the same video as Young. None of them could provide this level of detail, and not just because they lacked Young’s experience. The video was pulled from American TV within hours of its being first aired.

I distinctly remember seeing this video too in the aftermath of the crash. It stood out because it was a clear image of a missile hitting the plane.

42 posted on 01/08/2009 9:06:34 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
If you mean it was launched from NJ, that’s rather far from the incident.

It was a long range, shoulder launched, heat seeking, optically guided, shaped warhead, proximity fuzed, armor penetrating missile.

Just don't ask me, or anybody else, to identify the manufacturer or model - if *I* could tell you, they'd have already killed me.

43 posted on 01/08/2009 9:14:52 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san
Panetta was among those reinforcing the less scary bomb theory. CNN quoted him as saying that “chemical residues had been found on some of the bodies and plane parts.”...at the very least Panetta should be asked what made him think a bomb was involved in TWA 800 and why he changed his mind - just for the record.....
44 posted on 01/08/2009 9:20:48 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/t1000212.htm


45 posted on 01/08/2009 9:25:54 PM PST by FreeInWV (A moose bit my sister. Then Sarah Palin shot it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Wiser now

I do not believe this....there is no way this could have been hidden. If it was brought down, it was by terrorists. Many believe the plane that went down in Queens was a shoe bomber type thing.- possible.


46 posted on 01/08/2009 9:51:48 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Why not aknowledge a terrorist attack? I don’t know much about TWA 800, I know that there are those who insist they saw something else, but I can’t see why the cover up. A terrorist attack and Clinton would be the war president and would guarantee his reelection. And how do they manage to still keep it secret, when we can’t keep classified info secret? And since Clinton is out and Obama in.....why not spring the story now, especially would have been helpful in derailing Hillary’s campaign.

I’m not trying to be combative, I was still in highschool when it happened and didn’t follow it much at all. I’m just wondering why the cover up? It doesn’t make sense to me.


47 posted on 01/08/2009 9:57:03 PM PST by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

ping


48 posted on 01/08/2009 9:59:31 PM PST by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Paranoia will destroy ya.

Paranoia be damned!

Over 130 witnesses from all around Long Island Sound gave testimony similar to that described here - a streak going up from the surface and a subsequent small, then large, fireball.

The OVERWHELMING CORROBORATION was that these unrelated witnesses, spread over a wide arc, provided corroborating triangulation information as to the origin of the launch.

In other words, these multiple, unrelated, witnesses, with no knowledge of each other, validated each others' story by independently, yet collectively, pinpointing the launch location

49 posted on 01/08/2009 10:08:45 PM PST by Wil H (No Accomplishments, No Experience, No Resume No Records, No References, Nobama..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Ping to one of your favorite amusements.


50 posted on 01/08/2009 10:10:32 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

The One (piss be upon him)

lol


51 posted on 01/08/2009 10:14:43 PM PST by Rennes Templar (The Messiah and the Religion of Fleece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

And while we’re at it, why not acknowledge Arab involvement in OKC?

Why not acknowledge that Jose Padilla is John Doe #2?

‘Cause you’re banging an intern and you’ve got yours, screw everyone else.


52 posted on 01/08/2009 10:33:53 PM PST by Hessian (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: al baby

i agree with you
millions of 747 flights and that is supposedly the only one that blew up like that, i just don’t buy it.


53 posted on 01/09/2009 1:29:42 AM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd
Why not aknowledge a terrorist attack?

Democrat (nor Republican) leadership cannot and will not deviate from their support of one world government.

Compare events such as clinton's bombing of Serbia in support of the invading muslim terrorist KLA to the force applied by the clintonista's against Americans during the clinton regime.

clinton and his ilk did their part to further the globalist agenda. The new world order needed a perceived as strong enemy. Their studied inaction, when it came to Muslim terrorists, provided the banksters with time to morph muslim terrorists into our Orwellian nightmare.

Democrats couldn't acknowlege muslim attacks on our sovereignty. That would only serve to strengthen our National identity. That's a bad thing from the political leaders viewpoint.

Conversely, identifying OKC bombers as right wing extremists or groups like the Branch Davidians in Waco as dangerous religious cults weakens our Sovereign identity. For the one worlders that's a good thing.

And how do they manage to still keep it secret

There are secrets and then there are important secrets. One thing that has to be remembered is most politicians, and democrats especially, are cowards.

Keeping secrets in those circles can not only make you a lot of cash, it can keep you alive.

And it would mean our secretely planned transformation could continue.

54 posted on 01/09/2009 2:23:49 AM PST by MurrietaMadman (...It's all just MHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Wiser now
She refuses to tell me how she knows this.

I wonder why. </sarcasm>

55 posted on 01/09/2009 4:15:55 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy
Many believe the plane that went down in Queens was a shoe bomber type thing.- possible.

Who happened to be sitting on the outside of the fuselage so that he could blow the tail clean off?

56 posted on 01/09/2009 4:17:51 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I didn’t say I believe it...merely that most of those who believe in conspiracy theories do...I don’t know enough about air planes to make an informed decision. One thing I do not believe is an American missile or plane brought TWA done...it would have got out. What conspiracy folk fail to understand is that few are good at keeping secrets.


57 posted on 01/09/2009 4:33:08 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

In fact, I am sick of all conspiracy crap...birthers, 9-11, economy (meltdown was on purpose, Iraq war (no real intelligence Bush wanted revenge for attempt to off Dad), Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor, Kennedy assassination....the list could go on indefinitely.


58 posted on 01/09/2009 4:36:25 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy
In fact, I am sick of all conspiracy crap...birthers, 9-11, economy (meltdown was on purpose, Iraq war (no real intelligence Bush wanted revenge for attempt to off Dad), Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor, Kennedy assassination....the list could go on indefinitely.

On the other hand it's kind of fun to poke around them and see what kind of crazy stuff people actually believe.

59 posted on 01/09/2009 4:40:44 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

I live on LI. I know two people who witnessed the upward arc but from different locations. They were both @ fifty at the time and very sober, mature people (one is retired NYPD).

I'll take their word over anonymous, non-witness speculation.

60 posted on 01/09/2009 4:50:38 AM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson