Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seneca Nation targets NY Thruway in tax dispute
Jamestown Post Journal ^ | January 13, 2008

Posted on 01/13/2009 6:01:52 PM PST by Dan Nunn

BUFFALO -- It appears the New York State Thruway will again figure prominently in a dispute between the Seneca Indian Nation and the state over cigarette taxes.

On Tuesday, Seneca President Barry Snyder outlined the nations response to a law signed by Gov. David Paterson that would ban manufacturers from selling unstamped cigarettes to wholesalers who supply reservation stores.

Snyder says tribal councilors are now devising a system to collect tolls of $2 per car on the Thruway, where it passes through the tribes Cattaraugus Reservation in western New York. He called the interstate an illegal, unlicensed business.

In 1997, the Senecas burned tires and shut down part of the Thruway following an attempt that year by the state to tax Indian suppliers.


TOPICS: US: New York
KEYWORDS: americanindians; govwatch; indian; newyork; nysfiscalblackhole; seneca; taxes; thruway
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Dan Nunn
Prima facie, it looks like the loser governer of NY is on thin ice. Worcester v. Georgia (1832) established that State laws (such as New York's) have no authority in dealings with the Indian Nations.

The Constitution says that only Congress has the authority to deal with the Indian Nations. Of course, we all know how much respect liberals have for the Constitution.

21 posted on 01/13/2009 6:36:35 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrmargaritaville
Patterson is an idiot. Relative to the number of residents of NY those traveling to the reservations to buy cigs is minimal. If he wants to raise $$$$ with higher tobacco taxes-he should just tack another $2 a pack tax onto cigs sold in the state and leave the reservations alone.

Actually, some reports have the state losing millions per year because of the Indians breaking the law. Putting additional taxes on the packs will only encourage more illegal sales.

Personally, I'd prefer no taxes at all. However, if the taxes are going to be imposed they should be enforced equally, without regard to "race" or ethnicity.

22 posted on 01/13/2009 6:38:40 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Now if we can only get the rest of American on board...


23 posted on 01/13/2009 6:41:54 PM PST by Doohickey (The more cynical you become, the better off you'll be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
Prima facie, it looks like the loser governer of NY is on thin ice. Worcester v. Georgia (1832) established that State laws (such as New York's) have no authority in dealings with the Indian Nations.

Actually, in OKLAHOMA TAX COMM'N v. POTAWATOMI TRIBE, 498 U.S. 505 (1991) the US Supreme Court held, in a state is free to collect taxes on such sales to nonmembers of the tribe which is all the NYS law seeks to do.

24 posted on 01/13/2009 6:43:46 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight
America's indignant people...

LOL! That would include libtard in America

25 posted on 01/13/2009 6:44:05 PM PST by Doohickey (The more cynical you become, the better off you'll be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Let the Indians sell them as the currently do and set up customs stop on the US board of the Indian own lands. That way NY gets the taxes, the Indians get the business and the people get screwed just like the rest of the state.

BTW - I really have a problem with funding programs with items that are then taxed into oblivion. What happens when the costs are so high there is massive drop in tax revenue to support the programs? Oh yeah, it already happened.


26 posted on 01/13/2009 6:46:49 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
However, if the taxes are going to be imposed they should be enforced equally, without regard to "race" or ethnicity.

I agree 100%.

These native tribes haven't been exempt from various forms of taxation because of their race or ethnicity, but because of their location. From a legal standpoint Indian reservations are sovereign territories that aren't subject to the same laws as "ordinary" parts of the U.S.

27 posted on 01/13/2009 6:51:17 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
These native tribes haven't been exempt from various forms of taxation because of their race or ethnicity, but because of their location.

Not true. Most of the benefits of "sovereignty" apply only to members of the tribe (ie, members of that ethnicity) who are operating on the location in question.

28 posted on 01/13/2009 6:57:36 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

hahahahaaa .. yep, yer right! Stoopit me to trust spell-check .... indigenous it should have said :)


29 posted on 01/13/2009 7:00:05 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Shyla

“I hope the Sencas win this one.”

No one wins. ‘A nation within a nation’....it’s never worked, and it never will. Just more divide and conquer....identity politics.


30 posted on 01/13/2009 7:04:50 PM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mrmargaritaville

Why should members of the Seneca tribe be paying less cigarette tax than I do? Either this is America, or it isn’t. Either we’re equal or we’re not. It’s past time to stop this ‘tribal’ thinking.


31 posted on 01/13/2009 7:08:14 PM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

“Prima facie, it looks like the loser governer of NY is on thin ice. Worcester v. Georgia (1832) established that State laws (such as New York’s) have no authority in dealings with the Indian Nations”

Do you know what the result of that decision and Worcester winning it was?

The trail of tears. Jackson refused to enforce the Supreme court ruling in favor of ‘Worchester’, who was a missionary representing the Cherokee, against the state of Georgia.

Law means nothing if it’s not enforced.


32 posted on 01/13/2009 7:14:02 PM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“Personally, I’d prefer no taxes at all. However, if the taxes are going to be imposed they should be enforced equally, without regard to “race” or ethnicity. “

Thank you. After 200 & years at this Constitutional experiment, so few get that.


33 posted on 01/13/2009 7:16:06 PM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Well, that's true. I guess it makes sense that some mob boss couldn't just move to a "reservation" and claim that he's a Seneca or Oneida Indian.

I'd point out, though, that as time goes on it gets harder to state with any kind of certainty that someone who claims to be an "Indian" isn't telling the truth.

34 posted on 01/13/2009 7:17:10 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

I still hope the Senecas can beat the New York dem cash grab.


35 posted on 01/13/2009 7:26:54 PM PST by Shyla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Burn tires on the thruway? Won’t work, for long. What they need to do is burn down the NYS Assembly and Senate and then continue on and plant a charge under the Governor’s mansion.
When the Assembly and Senate are in session in Albany we have the largest aggregation of crooks, swindlers and thieves in one place in NY since the Mafia meeting in Apalachin in 1957.


36 posted on 01/13/2009 7:27:27 PM PST by Larry381 (Join BlueServo and protect your border.(http://www.blueservo.net/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
> Do you know what the result of that decision
> The trail of tears.

I did know that. Are you suggesting that Nobama and his Dem Congress are going to repeat such actions against the N.Y. Senecas?? As mindless as the Obama supporters/drones are, even they would raise an outcry against the weasel Dems if they tried to pull such a stunt.

37 posted on 01/13/2009 7:28:07 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“Well, that’s true. I guess it makes sense that some mob boss couldn’t just move to a “reservation” and claim that he’s a Seneca or Oneida Indian.

I’d point out, though, that as time goes on it gets harder to state with any kind of certainty that someone who claims to be an “Indian” isn’t telling the truth. “

__________________

Many tribes, including a local one,the Klamath can invite anyone to be a member of their tribe. Builds their numbers and handouts and political power. Many ‘Cheifs’ are not blood native. Tribal governments are notorious for corruption and scamming. John Ross, the ‘Chief’ of the Cherokees from the 1830’s to 1866 was blue eyed and 1/8th Cherokee.


38 posted on 01/13/2009 7:28:32 PM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I wouldn’t speculate what the government of NY might do. It’s beyond me. I admit I will smile if the Seneca’s put any left coast politico in their place. Then they need to shut up and remember they should be Americans like the rest of us instead of ‘Seneca’ first.


39 posted on 01/13/2009 7:36:46 PM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The Supreme Court of the United States has consistently ruled that a state may legally tax sales to non-Indians without violating federal law or the "treaties."

It's more than that. New York is telling the Indians to become tax collectors. New York already "charges" tax to non-Indians by requiring residents to declare purchases out of state.

40 posted on 01/13/2009 7:51:20 PM PST by Dan Nunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson