Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek May Stop Weekly Circulation
NewsMax ^ | 1/17/09

Posted on 01/18/2009 11:02:26 AM PST by Sammy67

Battered by a one-two punch of declining readership and ad pages, Newsweek magazine is getting an extreme makeover this year that will include a large circulation reduction, deep cuts in operating costs, and a new effort to attract advertisers by concentrating on an elite audience.

According to The New York Times, executives at Newsweek say the retooled magazine will focus on being a "thought leader" that focuses on telling readers how to think about news, rather than telling people what happened in the last week. The plan, similar to the editorial outlook espoused by The Economist magazine, is aimed at helping the newsweekly better compete in the face of competition from cable TV and the Internet. The transformation will likely include more analysis, commentary, and news-related feature articles.

“We’re not in the business of telling people the news,” Richard Stengel, managing editor of Newsweek's rival Time, told the Times. “News has become a commodity. They already

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bias; cable; internet; liberal; liberalmedia; magazine; media; networks; news; newsmonth; newsweak; newsweek; print; publications; publisher; reporting; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Sammy67

I’m glad they announced it because otherwise I’d have never known.


41 posted on 01/18/2009 11:24:41 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
re: the retooled magazine will focus on being a "thought leader" that focuses on telling readers how to think about news, rather than telling people what happened in the last week. )))

har har har... Who'll pay for that, when you can watch Jon Stewart for free?

42 posted on 01/18/2009 11:25:16 AM PST by Mamzelle (Boycott Peggy Swoonin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Oh, so they’ll only have his face on the cover once a month instead of once a week.


43 posted on 01/18/2009 11:25:58 AM PST by youturn (Ping me when he's gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

“Time is worse...if that’s possible”

It’s funny, because I pay zero attention to these pieces of trash except for (fortunately) rare visits to doctor’s/dentists offices when I’m just looking for something, anything to read. So, maybe I see these mags every 8 or 9 months or so. And it’s just amazing, to see these magazines submerge themselves, quantum by quantum, to intellectual levels at or below that of “Us” or “People” magazine. Seriously, these things are turning into 5th-grade review sheets for “current events” reports, and I don’t mean to insult any 5th graders.


44 posted on 01/18/2009 11:29:09 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: eartotheground

Good for you for canceling an unwanted subscription!

I had a feeling these magazines arrived free of charge at Doctor/Dentist and tire changing stores.

Every time I need to go in for service or a tune up I’m hit with this propaganda!


45 posted on 01/18/2009 11:30:55 AM PST by libertarian27 (Never has so many been owed so much by so few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

>>What kind of “elite audience” needs to be “told how to think about news”. Elite of drooling a**hats?<<

They can go to Hell.


46 posted on 01/18/2009 11:31:03 AM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

If they genuinely adopt this plan, it really will be the end for them.


47 posted on 01/18/2009 11:33:25 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Some heartening news during inauguration week.


48 posted on 01/18/2009 11:34:12 AM PST by CriticalJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

I love this business model. Do more of what is causing you to fail in the first place. Focus MORE on elites and MORE on telling people what to think. Yep, that’s the ticket.


49 posted on 01/18/2009 11:34:24 AM PST by The Right Stuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Aaawwwwwwwwwww

What a shame!

not


50 posted on 01/18/2009 11:36:49 AM PST by Carley (Remember when we had a real President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
executives at Newsweek say the retooled magazine will focus on being a "thought leader" that focuses on telling readers how to think about news

This is "new"..."HOW" to think?

Talk about out of touch! They've been doing that for decades with their obvious liberal spin on all things news.

The DO need to change their name, though...

NEWSWEAK is more precise....

51 posted on 01/18/2009 11:37:18 AM PST by NorCoGOP ("Restostare ab Pauculum" until 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Where’s my violin....


52 posted on 01/18/2009 11:38:21 AM PST by clintonh8r (Bill and Hillary Herpes....they never go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Sounds like what Life magazine did years ago. Didn’t work for them, either.


53 posted on 01/18/2009 11:47:30 AM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
According to The New York Times, executives at Newsweek say the retooled magazine will focus on being a "thought leader" that focuses on telling readers how to think about news, rather than telling people what happened in the last week.

What's interesting to me is the mindset behind this retooling: the Ivy Leaguers running Newsweek are the same masters (in their own minds) of the universe who've been running Wall Street (into the ground) for years. Telling readers how to think about the news? Please.

54 posted on 01/18/2009 11:47:59 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Right Stuff
I love this business model. Do more of what is causing you to fail in the first place. Focus MORE on elites and MORE on telling people what to think. Yep, that’s the ticket.

Drink the Cool Aid and if you can't afford Cool Aid, HELP is on it's way.

Don't let the ship sink, keep it afloat at any cost and perhaps CHANGE will keep it afloat.

Hide your wallet.....

Insanity has taken it's place in modern day America.

55 posted on 01/18/2009 11:48:22 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

pass the tissue


56 posted on 01/18/2009 11:48:52 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus
They can go to Hell.

FReepmail me privately to let me know what you REALLY think about Newsweak. ; )

57 posted on 01/18/2009 11:51:22 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Newsweek started telling readers how to think many years ago. They haven’t been a straight news reporter for at least the last decade.

Judging by the article, these people apparently actually believe they’ve been objectively reporting the news!

Unbelievable.


58 posted on 01/18/2009 11:53:37 AM PST by cydcharisse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
... concentrating on an elite audience ... the retooled magazine will focus on being a "thought leader" that focuses on telling readers how to think about news ...

Thank God for the elitists. I couldn't wipe my @ss without one of them around to do it for me.

59 posted on 01/18/2009 11:55:21 AM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Good.


60 posted on 01/18/2009 11:59:23 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson