SCOTUS message to the American people

Learn USA ^ | 01/20/2009 | Lynn M Stuter

[LucyT]

You’re welcome, Aurorales.

[Earthdweller]

"Wouldn’t anybody want to "avoid a Constitutional crisis - especially since 95% of all the blacks in this country would tear it apart if they thought for one moment - the white man - took away their black president."

One, I don't buy that "Blacks" are going to rip the country apart, most are law abiding citizens. To think otherwise is racist.

Two, you don't run a Country by a few peoples self appointed "common sense"..that's called a dictatorship.

Three...if a crisis were to arise, the fault would not be on the citizens who raised questions but on the person who perpetrated the secrecy that gave rise to the questions.

[M-cubed]

Very good link!.....I'm involved in schools in a small way....puts a good handle on a bigger picture

Ill be using that as reference in the future.... Thanks!

[Smokin' Joe]

Make that eight of the nine; “Justice Alito was not in attendance.”

[autumnraine]

What if I don’t trust “What if”.

[Eye of Unk]

I am sure someone has talked about this but in the photo of Obama in the Justice chambers did anyone happen to notice the document on the table?

Its size and color?

[bronxboy]

Not only would there be massive protest and rioting no doubt...by white and blacks who view this as conservatives overturning and election...the GOP and conservatives would be finished for a generation...I’m not worried because the Supreme court will not play politics with this issue.

Those of you who righteously talk about the constitution are fooling yourselves...it’s not about the constitution. Overturning an election would be unconstitutional. It’s about a refusal to accept the election results. Our guy lost period. Better luck in four years. If the court did what you want...ruled on natural born and then retroactively applied it to the 2008 election...now that would be unconstitutional and would destroy our election process.

[TalBlack]

“it’s not about the constitution. Overturning an election would be unconstitutional. “

You seem to worry about what is constitutional where you like rather than with respect to actuality. Overturning an election is a duty to the Constitution if the election itself is Constitutionally flawed.

Moving constitutional issues aside in the Obama case; Obama has a duty to the country and those who voted for him, not to mention to himself and his agenda, to end the question of his birth and show the document being so speculated about. It is the adult thing to do. It is the American thing to do. It is the RESPONSABLE thing to do.

[XenaLee]

"It is the adult thing to do. It is the American thing to do. It is the RESPONSABLE thing to do."

Yes....but.....

it's not the Marxist DemocRAT thing to do.

[Calpernia]

>>>Two, you don’t run a Country by a few peoples self appointed “common sense”..that’s called a dictatorship.

also called terrorism.

Excerpt:

Terrorism: the threat of violence against civilians in order to attain goals that are political

Now it comes packaged under ‘political correctness’ too.

[Danae]

The skinny in DC is that Barry’s Real Immigration status is going to be covered up. Official and unofficial DC considers having an unconstitutional President LESS dangerous than the civil unrest throwing his worthless ass out on to the curb where it belongs.

Yea it makes me sick.

[Polarik]

The invitation of Chief Justice Roberts, the behind closed door meeting with a man who is the subject of lawsuits coming before the Supreme Court concerning his eligibility to the office of president, was not only inappropriate but leaves questionable the judicial conduct of the justices with whom AKA and Biden met.

ex parte communication in an ongoing case is something no judge should allow.

[FreeAtlanta]

At this point, if some states do manage to get laws in place to require the long form certificate to be shown before being on the next election ballot, I suspect enough colusion that a really good forgery will be positioned in Hawaii. It's hard to imagine why it hasn't already happened, unless

• 1. This issue is being used to controll and manipulate our new president, and giving him a good forgery would free him to do whatever he wants
• or 2. Fear that there is real evidence that he was born overseas and noone wants to risk tampering with the "vault" copies and being hung out to dry

[Polarik]

Fear that there is real evidence that he was born overseas and noone wants to risk tampering with the "vault" copies and being hung out to dry

Hawaii officials are guaring the vault BC as if it were the Shroud of Turin The BC is the property of Hawaii, not Obama, so there would have to be collusion with high-level officials to pull a smash and grab.

Obama knows for a fact that he cannot get his grubby little hands on it, and even if he could, its non-authenticity would be a lot easier to spot as a forgery than the image was.

[null and void]

We shall see.

One cannot deny a volcano out of existence.

[Myrddin]

Under most circumstances, this would be seen as "tampering" with the judge(s). It isn't like can have the judges recuse themselves and refer the case to another court.

[Danae]

It’s all plausible. What’s more, is anyone in Hawaii in 1961 could have registered a birth. Regardless of where the baby was actually born, he could easily have been born in Kenya and brought to Hawaii and then registered as having been born at a STREET ADDRESS as opposed to a hospital. He would then have a Hawaii Certificate of birth, but still have been born in Kenya. All it would take would be for his mom and a witness to lie. No one would have asked for any proof whats so ever. If there are real records in Kenya, thats relevant! If there are real records of Indonesian citizenship, THAT is relevant. His Immigration status is RELEVANT because if he held citizenship of ANY other country, Britain, Kenya, Indonesia, BY LAW can NOT be a Natural Born Citizen. He is a naturalized Citizen.

[Frantzie]

It was a fraudulent election. There is nothing retroactive. We have someone who refuses to prove he is eligble, who raised hundreds of millions from unknown and possibly offshore sources, who has already signed orders that could benefit Islamic terrorists. A polling firm showed terrorism is #3 out of 15 things important to Americans. Faux global warming was last.

If SCOTUS and other courts keep “dissing” the citizenry then the next case should be filed by thousands of military members - retired, active and reserve.

Let the SCOTUS and other courts tell men and women who risk their lives and who take an oath to protect the Constitution that they have NO standing.

The project appears to be already happening with preliminary efforts through the VFW and other veterans groups.

[Danae]

I agree completely.

It IS tampering with the judges that have cases IN DOCKET against the defendant B. Hussein O.

Whole damn Government REEKS of Obama’s corruption now.

[IrishPennant]

The skinny in DC is that Barry’s Real Immigration status is going to be covered up.

Other elected Presidents have tried coverups - some succeeded...some did not!