Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here I'm not, Lord
The Catholic Thing ^ | Friday, 23 January 2009 | Mary Eberstadt

Posted on 01/23/2009 6:33:47 AM PST by sitetest

Today, readers, we interrupt revisiting the Seven Deadly Sins to raise a question of great significance during this eventful week. Why did Archbishop Donald Wuerl, the highest-ranking Catholic eminence in the Washington, D.C. area, attend Wednesday’s ostentatiously diverse, mega-denominational prayer service at the National Cathedral for President Obama?

Granted, the fanfare was impressive – seats for 3,200 distinguished guests, twenty especially prominent religious leaders, heart-rending bursts of song, and a liturgy ranging from the latest rewritings of the Book of Common Prayer to “Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, and Cherokee sources, among others,” as The Washington Post put it. It’s also true that the Roman Catholic archbishop of Washington traditionally leads a prayer at these august proceedings – which may for some observers render his presence there beyond question.

But the unique visibility of this event – which was presumably foremost in the minds of the archdiocesan officials who signed on to yesterday’s arrangements – also cuts another, more radical way. It means that a non-attending Roman Catholic archbishop of Washington would be missed, were he somehow to decline to appear. And that is exactly the point. He could have.

Why? As readers of TCT know well, our new president is the most unyielding, ideologically determined, and dogmatically pro-abortion leader yet to have assumed the highest office in our land. Our new vice-president is perhaps the most conspicuous practicing Catholic in the land, certainly such by his own repeated insistence, and is almost as conspicuous as our new president in his fidelity to the metaphysics of Roe vs. Wade.

The revamped White House website already boasts of the new administration’s arguably unrivalled support of Roe’s legacy, noting for example that Obama “has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice and will make preserving women's rights under Roe v. Wade a priority...”

(Excerpt) Read more at thecatholicthing.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: abortion; catholic; obama; wuerl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I searched for this but didn't find it. If this is a duplicate, my apologies.
1 posted on 01/23/2009 6:33:47 AM PST by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sitetest; Coleus; narses; Salvation; cpforlife.org

Ping.


2 posted on 01/23/2009 6:34:33 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
I'm not particularly a big fan of the D.C. Archbishop. however, I believe that the Church should stay engaged and remind President Obama on every possible occasion of the grave consequences for society that flow from abortion. You can't persuade if you don't stay in the game. And I know there is a delicate balance because the Church does not want to be viewed as endorsing a pro-abortion President.

Think of it this way -- every time President Obama sees a pro-life priest, bishop or cardinal, he is gently reminded of his positions contrary to life. That's how the Holy Spirit moves -- with a gentle whisper rather than a shout.

3 posted on 01/23/2009 6:39:06 AM PST by CWW (Palin & Jindal in 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk; MHGinTN

Ping.


4 posted on 01/23/2009 6:39:35 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWW
Dear CWW,

As the rest of the column points out, Archbishop Wuerl could have sent a priest in his stead. I'd have sent a transitional deacon (a seminarian in his final year before ordination) or a permanent deacon.

That would have made a much louder statement to the anti-Christ Obama and his apostate side-kick, Moron Joe.


sitetest

5 posted on 01/23/2009 6:41:20 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Because the Roman Bureaucracy has been slipping and sliding all over the theological landscape whenever it was convenient vis a vis the rulers concerned . . .

for the entire 1600 years of it’s existence.


6 posted on 01/23/2009 6:45:40 AM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Political Correctness is the Death of this Republic.


7 posted on 01/23/2009 6:45:44 AM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli now reads "Oil the gun..eat the cannolis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
Think of it this way -- every time President Obama sees a pro-life priest, bishop or cardinal, he is gently reminded of his positions contrary to life. That's how the Holy Spirit moves -- with a gentle whisper rather than a shout.

But sin clouds the intellect, leaving little hope that Obama will be reminded of anything at all. It is long past time for gentle reminders. Where are the bishops who are willing to use a bullhorn?

8 posted on 01/23/2009 6:46:28 AM PST by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CWW
there is another way of looking at his attendance. That is, to recognize the many Catholics who supported Obama - I think I read 75% of Catholic votes went to Obama.
9 posted on 01/23/2009 6:56:42 AM PST by elpadre (nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Dear elpadre,

The anti-Christ Obama only received about 54% of the Catholic vote, not 75%. And less of actual church-going Catholics.


sitetest

10 posted on 01/23/2009 6:59:45 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
sorry - that was 75% of Jewish vote went to Obama. But a preponderance of Catholic voters did go to Obama.
11 posted on 01/23/2009 6:59:51 AM PST by elpadre (nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lorica
Dear Lorica,

Your post reminds me of the comments of Flannery O'Connor about the hard of hearing and shouting.


sitetest

12 posted on 01/23/2009 7:00:59 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Dear Don Corleone,

I’m not sure there’s much of a republic left here.

sitetest


13 posted on 01/23/2009 7:01:50 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: CWW
Think of it this way -- every time President Obama sees a pro-life priest, bishop or cardinal, he is gently reminded of his positions contrary to life. That's how the Holy Spirit moves -- with a gentle whisper rather than a shout.

Surely the Holy Spirit was with the 250,000 marchers yesterday. Obama didn't seem to see them; he surely isn't going to "see" the Archbishop. The only way he will "see" him is if he makes a scene.

15 posted on 01/23/2009 7:08:03 AM PST by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: CWW

I think the reaction is exactly the opposite when seeing a Bishop or Cardinal at one of these events. They think this attendance means being pro-life doesn’t matter.


17 posted on 01/23/2009 7:13:34 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

I don’t know how to pronounce the archbishop’s name but I’m going to assume it rhymes with “hurl.”


18 posted on 01/23/2009 7:19:46 AM PST by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oratam

You got it.


19 posted on 01/23/2009 7:40:11 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Varda
Dear Varda,

I think that you're exactly right.

That's why I like the idea of sending a deacon, or at most, a priest, in the archbishop's place.


sitetest

20 posted on 01/23/2009 7:41:41 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson