Posted on 01/26/2009 7:59:40 AM PST by freepersup
08A524
LIGHTFOOT, GAIL, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
The application for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court is denied.
As I said, SCOTUS has not denied a case on standing. They have simply denied them. They are not obligated to take any case.
Even if one of the cases does have standing, they are going to deny them, because they aren't being given anything that makes any sense.
Now that I can agree with.
they are all avoiding this issue like the plaque....and it is the plaque to them, because when they confront this issue, SCOTUS, the House, Senate, will all be very very ill and there is no medicine strong enough for the cure. They will all be shown up as dumb a$$es because no one bothered to check it out before hand.
only agree with it once I learn how to spell check the word ‘country’
:)
They may win, but that will be up to the voters. The Democrats do not have the power to "not allow" it.
Yeah, looks that way.
I appreciate your clarification on what the court has or has not done. If my memory serves me correctly, one or possibly multiple lower courts have ruled that the plaintiff(s) did not have standing, permitting, by way of denial, the elevation of the cases to the SCOTUS.
That a loophole/flaw exists in the vetting/qualifying of candidates for election to office, at just about every level is painfully obvious. I think the SCOTUS can make sense of said problem. Whether the SCOTUS should be part of the solution seems to be a resounding no, from their point of view.
The only way his BC will ever be seen is is someone with access to it makes it public.
There has to be a patriot somewhere in that building.
It is my [decidedly pessimistic] belief that I will not live to see another Republican president or “legitimate” election.
They have finally found the perfect combination of techniques to completely run the table.
I pray that I will be proved wrong.
They may win, but that will be up to the voters.
That will be up to the people who decide who’s eligible to vote and register, and the people who make the rules about how votes are counted, and recounted, and recounted.
Like throwing out military absentees, and determining “voter intent” on ballots with blanks, and counting clearly botched ballots.
Look at the Washington governors race, and Franken’s election, and what Gore tried. Now these people are in charge of the house, senate, and executive, and will soon be in charge of hte courts, and will be the ones who make the rules about elections.
If his real BC is that dangerous, it’s already shredded, and burned, and the ashes dissolved in acid.
If it’s really that dangerous, there is or will be an excellent noncontroversial copy in place. CIA can do those sorts of things, expert documents for their deep cover agents, let’s see, who’s running CIA?
The SCOTUS is reviewing most of these cases after the fact. Sadly, declaring them moot, then quickly moving on to tea and crumpets has probably become routine for them.
They can’t stop a motivated GOP anymore then in 94.
The fact that they're denying them kind of speaks for itself.
And phantom votes.
What did U obots know about this email and when did you know it?
Listen to no one about where to send the green cards and any letters received from Congresscritters EXCEPT TO ME. I PURPOSELY KEPT THE GREEN CARDS IN THE FIELD DISPERSED WITH THE VOLUNTEERS RATHER THAN CENTRALIZING STORAGE IN THE EVENT THAT MY HOME WAS RATED. TRUST NO ONE IN TERMS OF THESE GREEN CARDS. THEY ARE “OUR ACE IN THE HOLE.” Doug
Doug,
I am getting VERY nervous here! I just received this email and am afraid to open it. HELP!!!!
Donna
???
He's batting a thousand so far.
Wait till the many military cases start being tossed on the Supreme’s desk’s.
And how will those differ from the ones already filed?
Sarcasm?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.