Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeMint, Sanford leading opposition to Obama stimulus plan
McClatchy via The Beaufort Gazette, Beaufort, SC ^ | 2009-02-04 | James Rosen

Posted on 02/04/2009 9:40:24 PM PST by rabscuttle385

WASHINGTON - Sen. Jim DeMint and Gov. Mark Sanford urged members of the Senate on Wednesday to reject President Barack Obama's economic-stimulus bill, as DeMint introduced a rival measure he said required only tax cuts.

Sanford, in Washington for a Republican Governors Association meeting, asked Republican senators at a Capitol Hill lunch convened by DeMint to follow the lead of House Republicans who voted against the $819 billion stimulus measure last week.

The bill passed the House by a 244-188 margin without a single Republican vote. It would bring South Carolina $3.2 billion, including a $905 million to eliminate a state budget deficit and $830 million to build and repair roads, bridges, schools, colleges, universities, water-treatment plants and other infrastructure.

Sanford and DeMint said they are joining forces in a bid to try to spark the kind of national outcry among conservatives that led to the defeat of a major Senate immigration-reform bill in 2007.

(Excerpt) Read more at beaufortgazette.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhostimulus; demint; demint2010; demint2012; economy; marksanford; sanford2012; senate; stimulus; taxes; theamericanoption; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: NVDave; perfect_rovian_storm
There are no capital gains (long or short term) after the past year. Dividends are being slashed left and right.

Don't assume that just because most folks were taking losses, that everyone was taking losses last year. And, quite a few public companies are still issuing dividends.

41 posted on 02/05/2009 6:32:42 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cedric; DoughtyOne; TADSLOS; cripplecreek; dcwusmc; MaggieCarta; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; ..
You really do have psychological issues.

You've taken a stand-alone story, positive on its own merits, and fouled it up by tying it to your irrational, anti-McCain, fetish.

Seek professional help.

In case you haven't noticed, McCain has been leading the charge to undercut DeMint and Sanford by offering up his own alternative bill, some sort of mutant hybrid containing questionable tax cuts and all sorts of pork.

Now, in the meantime...


42 posted on 02/05/2009 6:36:18 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Maybe Mark Sanford could loan some pigs to Jim DeMint :)
During the 2004 South Carolina budget showdown, Sanford took two piglets to the state house to illustrate the pork in the budget.


43 posted on 02/05/2009 6:36:29 AM PST by Amanda King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

McCain offered his lame alternative first.

And it was roundly ignored by everyone but the mentally impaired.


44 posted on 02/05/2009 6:40:02 AM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
What is here and now is that dividends are being slashed, stocks are going to zero, we’re now having to contend with talk of bank nationalization, etc. We’re now in an environment where such previously safe companies as Dow Chemical, with a dividend history of steady, growing dividends back to 1912, are faced with having to cut their dividend. Even utility stocks are not completely safe dividend plays any more, as Goldman Sachs is now warning investors to hedge utility stocks out to 2010. There are plenty of people who are selling out of stocks because they can see the handwriting on the wall. There are no cap gains to be had, and unless you’re a short-term trader like me, there aren’t about to be gains to be had. Neither the GOP nor the DNC is about to give traders tax cuts. They want to keep people as victims of the “buy-and-hold” scheme of picking the investors’ pockets.

Yes, all of this is because as you say 'the handwriting is on the wall'. However, this bill would change what the handwriting says.

Go look at how long it took the stock market to recover from 1933 onward, or in the 1970’s - and now project that onto the current environment. There’s going to be no stimulative benefit from playing with tax rates on cap gains for years and years to come.

You're comparing apples with oranges. Both times, they tried the Keynesian nonsense that they're planning on doing this time. At neither time, were the ideas in this bill implemented. It would seem that a different response is in order.

Remember, the object here is to create liquidity in the economy and increase GDP as a result of this “stimulus”

Okies, but none of the policies on the table is going to do that. Any increase in GDP is a Pyrrhic victory, since the money that created the supposed increase had to be first taken out of the private sector, borrowed, or printed, to accomplish that. Any upticks will be quickly slapped down by massive inflation anyway.

Creating liquidity and supposedly increasing GDP with government spending is a fool's errand. The government needs to make a strong statement that it's going to get out of the way of businesses trying to dig their way out of this hole. Will it be easy? No, it won't. But the Keynesian way is only going to prolong the suffering and dig the hole deeper.

The BEA GDP release for Q2 2008 shows what happened to the last “stimulus” from Bush: People put it into savings, by and large. There was little to no “stimulus” from handing people that one-off rebate.

That's exactly right. Giving someone $600 ain't the same as giving them a raise (or a cut in taxes, which amounts to the same thing) that is recurring. One-off rebates don't work and never will.

Hence, this is why job creation and wage growth must be targeted.

Job creation and wage growth? From the government? Are you sure you're on the right website? Let's stimulate both by letting businesses keep more of their money and taxing consumers less, so they have more disposable income to spend. This Keynesian crap is ridiculous. If this crap worked, NY State wouldn't be on the verge of bankruptcy right now.

Yes, the US consumer is shutting their wallets. Let's put some damn money back in it and do it permanently, not on a one off basis. That's what this bill is saying!

The US auto industry is doomed

Yes, it is. That's true regardless of how we deal with this financial crisis. Frankly, IMHO, the whole nation is completely doomed. We've allowed ourselves to force manufacturing offshore by raising the cost of doing business here to ridiculous levels, all to pay for the insane government solutions that you're here advocating for. By not smacking this bullcrap down long ago, we doomed ourselves.

This bill isn't a cure-all, but it's an indication that we're looking to move in the right direction. The wrong direction is for the GOP to jump on the Keynes bandwagon.

If you want liquidity, pass this bill, with your amendment on the offshore tax amnesty, and repeal SOX and we've got, not only liquidity, but a favorable business environment going forward.

45 posted on 02/05/2009 6:53:48 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Two questions:

  1. What is it in the water of South Carolina which produces such great patriots as Mark Sanford and Jim DeMint?
  2. Why doesn't Lindsey Graham drink any?

46 posted on 02/05/2009 6:54:23 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Incidentally, in the past I allowed my grandchildren to view the vacuous cartoons you subjected this board to, ad nauseum. They would always marvel at your inanity.

But your recent and sudden lurch into graphic vulgarity makes it impossible for me to treat the kids to your sophomoric rants.

Please desist, forthwith, FOR THE CHILDREN.

47 posted on 02/05/2009 6:56:11 AM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

Try using Firefox for your browser and get the AdBlockPlus addon for it. That way, if a picture bothers you, you can easily block it and you don’t have to look at it.


48 posted on 02/05/2009 6:57:48 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; upchuck

Do you have a ping list? If so, please put me on it.


49 posted on 02/05/2009 6:58:20 AM PST by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Oh, sorry...just saw your post.


50 posted on 02/05/2009 7:00:44 AM PST by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Bless you, Senator and Governor....and thanks.


51 posted on 02/05/2009 7:02:26 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric; cripplecreek; TADSLOS; dcwusmc; bamahead
But your recent and sudden lurch into graphic vulgarity makes it impossible for me to treat the kids to your sophomoric rants.

You think the famous image at post 42 is "graphic vulgarity"? My my, Cedric. This is a new low for you.

52 posted on 02/05/2009 7:04:43 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Enough people and funds (and hedge, sovereign, private equity, et al) are taking losses that the number of people “sitting tight” is a rapidly declining number.

The people “sitting tight” may very well have no gains to show for their efforts after this year, too. If the market continues down, they might well crack and sell too. Everyone has their breaking point.

Quite a few companies are issuing dividends, but the dividends are getting slashed, as I said. A big chunk of dividends in broad indexes like the SP500 came from the finance sector - like just over 30% in 2008 before the crap hit the fan. Those dividends from the finance sector are now down to about 15% of the SP500 dividends - and are probably headed much lower (like to near zero).

Those dividends from financials and banks have held on for FAR too long — and one of the things I think you’ll see in the next TARP round, or coupled onto the executive pay limitation proposal, is that banks who receive TARP funds must eliminate the dividend on the common. When that happens, there’s another chunk of the dividends on the SP500 gone.

Right now, div payouts on the SP500 are at their lowest point in 50 years. This is not your garden-variety recession.


53 posted on 02/05/2009 7:07:47 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper; rabscuttle385
Do you have a ping list?

Oh, he does, indeed!

If fact, it's called The Mother Of All Desperately Insecure Ping Lists!

54 posted on 02/05/2009 7:13:47 AM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

The way to put money back in the consumers’ wallets on an ongoing basis is to target job creation: that is small business. Period, end of discussion. Small businesses don’t out-source. They don’t ship entire plants overseas. They create the majority of jobs here in the US.

So screw the multinationals and their agendas. Furthermore, say “no” to the agenda of multinationals and their demands for more H1B visas. Clamp down on immigration rapidly - both legal and illegal. Without the additional 800K+ jobs we have to create just to employ the wave of immigration, we have a chance to see workers in the US gain some bargaining power for wage increases.

The core of the GOP’s agenda should be as follows: Target job creation (ie, small business) with tax cuts and incentives. Target wage growth by removing excess labor (ie, H1B’s and rampant immigration) from the labor pool.

That’s the only way we’re going to see a sustained increasing in consumer spending power in the US.


55 posted on 02/05/2009 7:14:11 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

[Permanently limit itemized deductions to charitable contributions and mortgage interest, simplifying the tax code.]

WHY? I don’t want to pay federal income tax on money I turned over to state and local governments (real estate tax, state income tax, personal property tax).


56 posted on 02/05/2009 7:15:17 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cedric; truthkeeper; upchuck

Cedric, just go away. Truthkeeper was looking for the ping list referenced by post 2 (i.e., the DeMint and Sanford ping lists kept by upchuck).


57 posted on 02/05/2009 7:18:12 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Thanks, sweetie.


58 posted on 02/05/2009 7:29:36 AM PST by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
Agree with some of your points esp. the child tax credit. I also don't believe it is fair for ‘some’ with children to take from those who don't have them. Don't have the children IF you can't afford it! Giving tax breaks to those with children is simply liberal ideaology and a Rino idea. Other points are good...I'm just praying the Repbulicans stand firm.
59 posted on 02/05/2009 7:29:38 AM PST by Faithfull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
I feel in good company since I suffer from the same anti-McCain fetish. At the end of the day, the man had no principles and was largely indistinguishable from his opponent, so when faced with the choice between a real liberal and a fake liberal the American people agreed it was better to choose the one without the split personality.
60 posted on 02/05/2009 7:31:51 AM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- follow the money and you'll find truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson