Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BRING IT ON
NEALZ NUZE ^ | FEBRUARY 6, 2009 | NEAL BOORTZ

Posted on 02/06/2009 10:00:24 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Turret Gunner A20
I mean, our new president has talked rightly about accountability and transparency.

Talk is cheap. Can she show a SINGLE instance where he has walked the talk?

21 posted on 02/06/2009 10:52:16 AM PST by Maceman (If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Time to dig into this idiots background. Starting with her taxes. These people are just BEGGING for an ass whipping. And...they are gonna get it!

I sure hope you are correct.
22 posted on 02/06/2009 11:05:42 AM PST by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Talk is cheap.

Talk is cheap. Supply exceeds demand.

23 posted on 02/06/2009 1:02:14 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Want to tell me whatÂ’s bothering you, or would you like to break more furniture?" - Deana, to Wor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20; All

Also see http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2179976/posts


24 posted on 02/06/2009 1:24:40 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Liberals aren't always so liberal when people disapprove of their point of view." -- Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Why doesn’t somebody prosecute this obvious crime? Conflict of interest is a crime, isn’t it?

BTW, Schultz and Miller get ratings that are barely measurable, which is the best of any leftie talker.


25 posted on 02/06/2009 1:31:04 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

26 posted on 02/06/2009 6:39:16 PM PST by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

The follow is the “standard” response that I received:

February 6, 2009

Thank you . . .

. . for contacting me about the “fairness doctrine,” which required broadcasters on public airways to allow time for contrasting points of view. I appreciate that you have taken the time to communicate your views and concerns with me.

The Federal Communications Commission first implemented this doctrine in 1949. At the time, it was concerned about the limited number of radio and television broadcast frequencies being controlled by advocates with a singular point of view. The FCC abandoned the doctrine in the 1980s. Should any proposal to reinstate this doctrine come before me in the Senate, I will be sure to keep your views and concerns in mind.

Thank you again for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to do so again if I can be of assistance to you in the future.

Sincerely,

Debbie Stabenow
United States Senator


27 posted on 02/07/2009 5:48:50 AM PST by hondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson