Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BRING IT ON
NEALZ NUZE ^ | FEBRUARY 6, 2009 | NEAL BOORTZ

Posted on 02/06/2009 10:00:24 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20

We have yet another moonbat senator to add to the list: Michigan Democrat Senator Debbie Stabenow. This woman thinks that right now would be the perfect time to bring back the Fairness Doctrine. Interviewed on a talk show yesterday, Stabenow said, "I think it's absolutely time to pass a standard. Now, whether it's called the Fairness Doctrine or something else - I absolutely think it's time to be bringing accountability to the airwaves. I mean, our new president has talked rightly about accountability and transparency. You know, that we all have to step up and be responsible. And, I think in this case, there needs to be some accountability and standards put in place."

If Stabenow gets her way we could expect these hearings as soon as this year.

Me? Thanks for asking. I'm loving this. I welcome the hearings - and I relish a Democrat-led attack on talk radio. Can you say "more listeners?" With more listeners come higher ratings, and with higher ratings come higher prices for advertising .. and with more money comes ...well, you connect the dots.

There is one problem though, since the hearings will be conducted by Democrats you can rest assured that the list of witnesses will be tightly controlled. It is highly doubtful you'll hear any testimony from experts who can tell these hacks that leftist talk radio fails simply because people can't stand listening to that dogsqueeze.

Left wing talk radio, with a few exceptions such as Ed Schultz and Stephanie Miller, does not get ratings. Two viable hosts cannot keep the genre afloat. No ratings - no advertising. Therefore it loses money. How simple is this?

Look ... the left-wing talk radio station in Washington DC, for goodness' sake, just flipped formats. This station even used "Obama" in its title. If left-wing "Obama" talk radio can't make it in DC, where can it succeed?

Well, there's always Madison, Wisconsin.

Oh and by the way, this might be of some slight interest to you. Stabenow is married to the co-founder of TalkUSA Radio network and is now the Vice President of ... wait for it .. Air America.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: censorshipdoctrine; democrats; fairnessdoctrine; michigan; stabenow; stabmenow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Turret Gunner A20
I mean, our new president has talked rightly about accountability and transparency.

Talk is cheap. Can she show a SINGLE instance where he has walked the talk?

21 posted on 02/06/2009 10:52:16 AM PST by Maceman (If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Time to dig into this idiots background. Starting with her taxes. These people are just BEGGING for an ass whipping. And...they are gonna get it!

I sure hope you are correct.
22 posted on 02/06/2009 11:05:42 AM PST by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Talk is cheap.

Talk is cheap. Supply exceeds demand.

23 posted on 02/06/2009 1:02:14 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Want to tell me whatÂ’s bothering you, or would you like to break more furniture?" - Deana, to Wor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20; All

Also see http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2179976/posts


24 posted on 02/06/2009 1:24:40 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Liberals aren't always so liberal when people disapprove of their point of view." -- Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Why doesn’t somebody prosecute this obvious crime? Conflict of interest is a crime, isn’t it?

BTW, Schultz and Miller get ratings that are barely measurable, which is the best of any leftie talker.


25 posted on 02/06/2009 1:31:04 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

26 posted on 02/06/2009 6:39:16 PM PST by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

The follow is the “standard” response that I received:

February 6, 2009

Thank you . . .

. . for contacting me about the “fairness doctrine,” which required broadcasters on public airways to allow time for contrasting points of view. I appreciate that you have taken the time to communicate your views and concerns with me.

The Federal Communications Commission first implemented this doctrine in 1949. At the time, it was concerned about the limited number of radio and television broadcast frequencies being controlled by advocates with a singular point of view. The FCC abandoned the doctrine in the 1980s. Should any proposal to reinstate this doctrine come before me in the Senate, I will be sure to keep your views and concerns in mind.

Thank you again for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to do so again if I can be of assistance to you in the future.

Sincerely,

Debbie Stabenow
United States Senator


27 posted on 02/07/2009 5:48:50 AM PST by hondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson