Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christina Beam: Common ground on gun control
Baraboo News Republic ^ | 18 February, 2009 | Christina Beam

Posted on 02/18/2009 2:00:36 AM PST by marktwain

As far as dichotomies go, my brother-in-law and I pretty much fit the bill.

There is no one in my life more different than me than him.

He's a former Marine, an avid hunter and sport shooter, a guy who does honest work with his hands and doesn't talk more than he has to.

And if I hadn't married his brother and he were asked to describe me, he would probably use a term like "bleeding-heart liberal" or "hippie." I wouldn't go that far, but you know, it's all relative.

Still, when I saw him recently, we found common ground on a topic I never expected: Gun control.

Like some of the recent writers to the Mailbag, he's nervous as heck that President Obama and all those Democrats in Congress are going to "take his guns away."

Around my mother-in-law's kitchen table, he launched into a list of exactly the kinds of firearms and magazines and ammo that he uses, and why he feels they're threatened by certain legislators.

I couldn't recite the list if I tried, but it was important to him, so I listened. My brother-in-law is an extremely responsible gun owner. He treats his personal firearms with the same respect and safety precautions that he did his Marine-issued ones.

And he doesn't want to be treated like a criminal.

"It's just…" he said, pausing. "It's just that there's nothing I love more in life than shooting. And they want to take away the thing that matters most to me."

Though I've only once been to a shooting range, and I'll never hunt and never own a gun, when he put it that way, I could understand it.

But here's where it got interesting: He didn't argue that his individual right to bear arms is more important than gun victims' rights to safety — end of discussion. Instead he said he understands where people like Rep. Bobby Rush, who proposed a broad-sweeping gun control bill in Congress last month, are coming from.

Rush represents the South Side of Chicago, and named the bill after Blair Holt, a Chicago honor student who heroically shielded a friend during gang shooting on a public bus in 2007 and died in the attack.

Blair Holt's father, a Chicago police officer, has dedicated himself to curbing gun violence against minors in Chicago — where 33 other students were killed in the same year as his son.

That's a world away from my camo-clad brother-in-law, but he recognized the deep social currents underlying gun debate in this country.

It's not just taking guns out of the hands of criminals, he acknowledged, because by the time they're criminals, it's probably too late.

It's more about poverty, inadequate education, and a lack of the sort of responsible parenting he and my husband received.

Something needs to be done, he said, it just runs deeper than guns alone — and he doesn't want to be punished by a remedy that only scratches the surface.

That's where we parted ways, argumentatively speaking.

If enacted, the Blair Holt gun control bill would require, among other things, that all handgun owners obtain a license for ownership and that all firearm sales go through a licensed dealer.

I doubt the bill in its current form would ever pass, given that nearly half of all American households have guns, and it would be a bureaucratic and much-protested mess. But I do think requiring a gun owner to comply with similar laws as, say, a car owner, is not such a bad idea.

My brother-in-law worries that any step toward tracking guns is a step toward taking them away.

Still, I'm hoping that if gun control change does come with new leadership that it can encompass the sort of compromise we made, while setting our differences aside.

Christina Beam is a former education reporter for the News Republic. She can be reached at christina@

christinabeam.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; bradybill; constitution; liberal; rkba; secondamendment; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
What muddy headed thinking. I did not detect any compromise! Christina Beam is a typical liberal. If you contact her, please be polite. It doesn't sound as if she is realy stupid, just very ignorant.
1 posted on 02/18/2009 2:00:37 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I put her in the same category as I would any other enemy of the US Constitution. You cannot ‘compromise’ something that is given as a RIGHT in the Constitution. She is as dangerous, or moreso, than the most ardent gun grabbers. This lady will trade YOUR freedom for a little bit of false Obama security. In the end, both of us will be enslaved.


2 posted on 02/18/2009 2:08:37 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Yeah. It’s okay for guys in camo who live out in the woods and hunt to have certain firearms for sport hunting - but we gotta keep ‘em out of the cities, especially places like the South Side of Chicago which is just full of, you know, ignorant, unEDucated violence prone minorities who do not have the pedigree and upbringing that little miss Christeeeena has.


3 posted on 02/18/2009 2:10:28 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
"If enacted, the Blair Holt gun control bill would require, among other things, that all handgun owners obtain a license for ownership and that all firearm sales go through a licensed dealer."

Well, ok by me then. Just list which other rights she would support having a license for and which must go through a licensed rights broker.

4 posted on 02/18/2009 2:26:33 AM PST by Enterprise (A Representative Republic - gone now. Foolish people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

‘You cannot ‘compromise’ something that is given as a RIGHT in the Constitution.”

Minor nit on your post. The Constitution doesn’t GIVE us those rights. It prohibits the govt from infringing on those pre-existing rights.


5 posted on 02/18/2009 2:57:59 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

My response to liberals like Ms. Beam.

6 posted on 02/18/2009 3:11:42 AM PST by Zakeet (Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Its not even given as a right by the constitution.
Its a God given right PROTECTED by the constitution


7 posted on 02/18/2009 3:17:16 AM PST by mylife (The Roar of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I am sure people like her would be happy with the gun
control in the USSR.

Hunters were allowed to have smooth bores with type
and quantity of ammunition controlled.

Rifles and hand guns were only for the police, military
and thugs.

8 posted on 02/18/2009 3:33:05 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunhem?), change America will die for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Sorry Christina Beam, you can stand in the middle. I will be shooting that direction from my side.


9 posted on 02/18/2009 3:37:30 AM PST by bmwcyle (The end is near and this time I mean it. Get right with JESUS NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The common ground occurs when he agrees with her on one point.
She can’t quite bring herself to agree with him on other points.

Typical liberal - compromise is when you accept their position.


10 posted on 02/18/2009 3:51:15 AM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

one wonders how many of these 33 students who were kiled by bad guys were targeted because they were students, and forbidden to carry guns on campus, and would be alive today had they been able to defend themselves.

blamign poverty is disengenuous because poverty is no reason or excuse to shoot someone.The real problem is ignorance. Teach children about guns, rather than Heather’s two daddies, and maybe you’ll see something.


11 posted on 02/18/2009 3:55:12 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
guy who does honest work with his hands

So according to the little reporter girl if you don't work with your hands what you do isn't honest? I see the hard core socialist distrust for anyonw who works with their brains surfacing here

But I do think requiring a gun owner to comply with similar laws as, say, a car owner, is not such a bad idea.

Every useful idiot who supported tyranny and worships the power of the state feels the same way. Well here is a compromise. End all restrictions on type of firearm, quantity of firearm, and allow concealed carry without a "license" from the state. Then I might consider what the other side wants maybe. I might consider a limit on the number of RPG or 81mm rounds I can store in my house to 30 or so.

12 posted on 02/18/2009 4:03:52 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

You are correct. Every “compromise” on gun control has always been about us giving up more of our rights. A compromise should always include us getting something for giving something.


13 posted on 02/18/2009 4:09:28 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Christina Beam: Common ground on gun control

Her six feet under it...

14 posted on 02/18/2009 4:30:46 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I will not compromise my Bill of Rights... I will defend them under arms and I am willing to give my life or take a life if threatened... are you mizzzzzzzz beam? (beam you up maybe)

LLS

15 posted on 02/18/2009 4:38:35 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
That's a world away from my camo-clad brother-in-law, but he recognized the deep social currents underlying gun debate in this country.

It's not just taking guns out of the hands of criminals, he acknowledged, because by the time they're criminals, it's probably too late.

It's more about poverty, inadequate education, and a lack of the sort of responsible parenting he and my husband received.

Something needs to be done, he said, it just runs deeper than guns alone — and he doesn't want to be punished by a remedy that only scratches the surface.

Naive take on the agenda behind H.R. 45. IF Christina's brother-in-law "agreed" with her on the above, he was probably just being polite to his brother's lame-brained wife.

16 posted on 02/18/2009 4:43:41 AM PST by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
Blair Holt's father, a Chicago police officer, has dedicated himself to curbing gun violence against minors in Chicago — where 33 other students were killed in the same year as his son.

A little research would probably find a significant majority of these "students" to be thugs, perhaps carrying an illegal gun themselves, who were killed by competing thugs in the course of their thug activities.

The emotive word "students" is used precisely because it implies they were all innocent children, students killed by guns rampaging out of control.

17 posted on 02/18/2009 4:50:38 AM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Christina beam is a typical liberal.SO TRUE,just a tool.


18 posted on 02/18/2009 4:53:05 AM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

With the LibTards, it’s never been about rights or freedoms, it’s always about control, pure and simple.


19 posted on 02/18/2009 5:03:09 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The only compromise she makes here is that she doesn’t openly despise and condemn him for having a contrary opinion.


20 posted on 02/18/2009 6:02:51 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson