Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mo. man, angered over digital switch, shoots his TV set
bnd.com ^ | 02/20/09 | KSDK

Posted on 02/20/2009 6:33:27 AM PST by TornadoAlley3

The digital transition has left some confused, but a Joplin man was down right frustrated with the switch. So frustrated, in fact, that he peppered his television set with gunfire.

Police responded to the man's house Wednesday after reports of shots being fired inside.

Turns out the 70-year-old gunman was livid over losing cable and could not get his digital converter box to work. Police took Walter Hoover into custody after a brief standoff and charged him with unlawful use of a firearm.

Hoover's wife told police that he had been drinking before the incident.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: banglist; digital; dtv; shoots; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: TornadoAlley3

Ah, yes, the remote control of last resort.


41 posted on 02/20/2009 7:36:00 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

I bet he felt wonderful afterward. Probably eased quite a few frustrations.


42 posted on 02/20/2009 7:42:55 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kalee

My senior lit teacher had a kill your television bumper sticker in her class room.


43 posted on 02/20/2009 7:45:20 AM PST by Cailleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Durus

Discharging a firearm in a city is usually illegal because bullets tend to go through things and houses are pretty close together.

Exceptions are of course made for properly-built gun ranges and self defense, but I don’t think shooting your TV qualifies as a necessary use of a firearm, even if Helen Thomas was on and it was a knee-jerk reaction to keep you from pulling your eyes out.


44 posted on 02/20/2009 7:53:33 AM PST by antiRepublicrat ("I am a firm believer that there are not two sides to every issue..." -- Arianna Huffington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
I missed the "necessary use of a firearm" clause in the 2nd amendment. I also missed, apparently, that he damaged anything other then a TV, and that he lived in a city.

Barring any damage done to anything other then the TV I don't think he should have been arrested.
45 posted on 02/20/2009 8:19:58 AM PST by Durus (The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

He himself, his wife, and the people next door were all fine. The only damage was to his TV.


46 posted on 02/20/2009 8:23:01 AM PST by Durus (The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
The only think he could get on his TV was a John Connors speech?
47 posted on 02/20/2009 8:27:48 AM PST by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cailleach

I remember her and her sticker.


48 posted on 02/20/2009 8:35:50 AM PST by kalee (01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kalee

she was anti-computer too if I remember. She was also probably a raging lib. Kinda hippy-ish wasn’t she?


49 posted on 02/20/2009 8:45:25 AM PST by Cailleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Califreak; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

I knew I’d seen that tagline before.


50 posted on 02/20/2009 9:01:04 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Each "Yea" vote for porkulus is equivalent to $3,267,973,850. (D) = corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cailleach

Yes. she probably was.


51 posted on 02/20/2009 9:28:15 AM PST by kalee (01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Crolis

It’s all your fault, Crolis. You will be getting a visit from the TV police
for inciting TV hatred. /s


52 posted on 02/20/2009 9:32:40 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (Welcome to Obama's America... Be afraid, be very afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Annoying isn’t it. Initially I had a few great days and thought great - more channels - better picture.

Now the bad days easily equal the good ones. Channels I never had a problem with using analog, often break up badly. And I’m researching if there is a way to accomodate for the periodic drops in signal quality.


53 posted on 02/20/2009 10:10:48 AM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952; VirginiaMom
Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic ...;0)
54 posted on 02/20/2009 10:35:43 AM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

LOL!! I knew this was a thread made for you.


55 posted on 02/20/2009 10:41:25 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Each "Yea" vote for porkulus is equivalent to $3,267,973,850. (D) = corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Durus
I missed the "necessary use of a firearm" clause in the 2nd amendment.

It's not needed. I don't know any gun owner who would advocate the irresponsible use of a firearm, and shooting for no good reason with other houses in close proximity isn't responsible use, nor is it a responsible exercise of our 2nd Amendment right.

I like it when idiots who misuse firearms get busted. The corollary to that is that those who use them responsibly should be left alone by the government. Instead of course the government uses the irresponsible idiots as an excuse to restrict the rights of the responsible.

56 posted on 02/20/2009 11:21:20 AM PST by antiRepublicrat ("I am a firm believer that there are not two sides to every issue..." -- Arianna Huffington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ozark hilljilly

bttt


57 posted on 02/20/2009 11:24:04 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
I don't know that "irresponsible use of a firearm" exists in this situation and neither do you. You don't know what the backstop was, how close the closest neighbor was, the BAC of the shooter etc. Still you assume that he must be in the wrong. There is no report of anyone being hurt or any property damage to anyone (Else's) home so where is the irresponsible use?

If someone wants to shoot up their TV, as long as no one else is hurt, it's none of your business regardless if you agree with the action or not.
58 posted on 02/20/2009 11:47:06 AM PST by Durus (The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Durus
If someone wants to shoot up their TV, as long as no one else is hurt, it's none of your business regardless if you agree with the action or not.

I think the action itself was pretty funny. But, no, I don't think a person should be able to discharge firearms willy-nilly in a crowded environment. The possibility innocent injury is just too high. It is my business if I'm only a thin wall away from where he's shooting.

We used to take our stuff out to the desert to shoot it up. It's fun, and much more responsible.

59 posted on 02/20/2009 12:36:22 PM PST by antiRepublicrat ("I am a firm believer that there are not two sides to every issue..." -- Arianna Huffington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

What crowded enviroment?


60 posted on 02/20/2009 12:41:30 PM PST by Durus (The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson