Posted on 02/24/2009 9:06:13 PM PST by rxsid
Quote:
Major General Commanding General Carroll D. Childers Joins Military Suit
CONSENT FORM
DATE: 24 Feb 2009
Attn. Orly Taitz, Esq.
26302 La Paz, Ste. 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
I agree to be a plaintiff in the legal action to be filed by Orly Taitz, Esq. in a PETITION FOR A DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT THAT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT of the U.S., nor TO BE COMMANDER IN CHIEF of the U.S. ARMED FORCES, in that I am or was a sworn member of the U.S. military (subject to recall), and therefore when serving as an active member of the military, I would be unable to follow any orders given by a Constitutionally unqualified Commander In Chief, since by doing so I would be subject to charges of aiding and abetting fraud and committing acts of treason.
TYPED NAME or Signature: Carroll D. Childers
FULL NAME: Carroll Dean Childers
POSITION IN THE MILITARY/RANK/DATES SERVED/STATUS: Retired as Major General Commanding General 29TH Infantry Division VA ARNG 1999, 44 years service
OCCUPATION: Consultant Registered Professional Engineer
ACHIEVEMENTS: Retired 38 Yrs DON Civil Service, RDT&E, several patents, 14 months in combat zones as science advisor (Vietnam, Persian Gulf, Operation Desert Storm), Oldest DHG of a Ranger Course (42), retired MG, married 50+ years, still ticking and kicking
I can present a long list of reasons, taken individually, which convinced me NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama; his crime associates in the USA, his lack of experience, the mystery of his citizenship, his promise to make coal power industry bankrupt through excessive regulations, his constant adjustment of position on issues, his tax plan, his spread the wealth admission, his obvious socialistic goals, his associations with foreign leaders unfriendly to the USA, the lies he tells about a range of subjects including perhaps who his biological father really is, his most recent revelation of having a "National Security Force" (whatever that is)...............all of these says he is a person of mystery, of no integrity, and in fact paints him with the same narcissist paint of Hitler, Stalin, Saddam, Mao, and Kim Jong Ill.
But then, there is a simple more direct, easier to understand reason that I did not vote for him and that is his lack of respect for the country that is giving him the opportunity to run for the highest office in the land........even though I personally think he is not constitutionally eligible.
But more than 50% of America voted for this charlatan and he now has the helm of the ship of state. Even so, he is not MY President. I will not refer to him as such. I will call him Resident Obama, and an illegal resident of the white house at that. I resent him for what he is not. He has not given proof that he is a natural born citizen of these United States. He has spent millions of dollars protecting the truth of his birth from public knowledge; therefore, it is obvious he has something to hide. He is an interloper, a usurper, a fake, a scam artist, a Chicago crook, a recipient of bribes and gratuitous income for which he paid no tax, a socialist (perhaps only a communist or Marxist), and a grave danger to the future of the America that I love and have protected since I was 17 years old.
I have told my two senators and my member of the House of Representatives. I have written 9 justices of the Supreme Court as well as President Bush before he left office. NONE have responded, therefore, they are all complicit and should all be severely punished for having failed in their sworn oath to protect and defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The instant Obamb was sworn in, he violated the oath he took because he took the office knowing he is ineligible and there stood Judge Roberts who should have immediately had Obama arrested and deported.
Other than this, my key short-term complaint is that he has not had a heart attack in office. But most important, what I really want is the truth; is Obama a natural born citizen of the United States. If not a natural born citizen, America has been defrauded and then we would be stuck with Joe Biden whose only redeeming attribute is that he is probably not a communist.
Carroll D. Childers P.E.
Major General (Retired)
End Quote
No kidding...he would have been slogging it with soldiers quite literally, half his age.
This is not going away.
Thanks for the ping. Whatta guy...
Point conceded.
He's cutting Tri-Care...
Well it seems like the list is growing by the day. These men are also heavy hitters. We have a former colonel and big hitter at the NSA. Senator Shelby was in the Senate intel committeee and had dealings with the NSA.
My guess is the intel community knows he was born in Kenya and may have the goods. If more active duty join Orly’s case - dozens, then hundreds then thousands - he will be finished. I would not be suprised that Brit, Russian or other foreign intel agents or retired agents have his Kenyan BC.
Berg said last night that someone searched the Honolulu hospital records and there is no record. O claims one Hono hospital while step sister has changed her story. Berg may have checked the big one that is the one he woul dprobably have been born in.
If the courts do not enforce the Constitution and the laws then they cease to have any meaning. Ballot box, jury box then cartridge box.
If ACORN is rigging the ballot boxes and judges are ignoring the Constitution and laws then......
You have active military, retired military and retired intelligence agents joining these cases. Constitutional attorney Dr. Edwin Vieira predicted that eventually the military may get involved to resolve this.
Thank you for all the pings...I’m lovin’ it!
It would be very much in their best interests to get to the bottom of the matter ... then make use of their knowledge.
My guess would be two words.
Court Martial.
If any of them we're re-instated, or any on Active duty, would be Court Martialed I would imagine that in their defense they would be allowed to supeana the various ultra super top secret documents from Barry's past.
That could be Lt. Easterling's strategy/gamble.
“For what? He’s a retired general who hasn’t been on active duty for 10 years. Any injury he may claim because of Obama’s ineligibility is highly speculative to say the least. And doesn’t meet the requirements to establish legal standing. He has not more chance of success than any of Taitz’s other cases.”
Let’s see if you can majke that argument with respect to Lt. Easterling when they decide to court-martial him. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if Hussein attempts to exert improper chain of command influence to divertthis case.
Like you, he doen’t want transparency.
Depends on what they're court martialed for I expect. If someone tried to nail them on Article 88, Contempt Towards Officials, then maybe. But it their commanding officer tells them to deploy and their response is "No, 'cause Obama ain't the president" then I imagine they'll be on the wrong end of a General Court, and they can subpoena Obama's birth certificate till the cows come home and it'll never be allowed.
You're talking apples and oranges. You need legal standing to initiate a suit, which is why all these past proceedings have failed. But if Lieutenant Easterling refuses to obey orders, then he'll face criminal charges. Legal standing doesn't enter into it, he'll be facing prison time. His ability to demand documents is not absolute and would need to be approved by the presiding judge. And if he goes in there and says, "I refused to obey the orders of my commanding officer because Obama isn't president. And I need Obama's birth certificate to prove my case" then I imagine that it'll take the presiding judge just long enough to stop laughing in order to say, "No."
But I observed last night on TV the unconscionable hobnobbing that took place (prior to Obama's speech) between the SCOTUS justices and Obama. I use the word "unconscionable" because the SCOTUS justices have pending business dealing with cases in which Obama is a party, and any socializing between judges and participants in cases that are scheduled to come before them violates the tenets of judicial ethics. (This is not the first time that such fraternization between Obama and the SCOTUS judges has occurred.) Frankly, this is not a good sign for those of us hoping and praying for the success of the plaintiffs in these cases.
or is it “Contract law”?
In your opinion who would have legal standing?
Beats me. The one clear thread in all I've read is establishing standing in any suit is difficult and it's meant to be. If you're going to sue someone then it should be difficult. You should required to show just how and where a person's actions invaded your legally protected interest, and that injury should be real and immediate and not hypothetical or potential. So where is the injury in any of these cases? Other than a grumpy dissatisfaction that Obama is president I'm not seeing any. Am I happy that Obama is president? No. Would I be happier if someone else was in the Oval Office. Sure. But my displeasure isn't enough to justify a suit, even if I was conviced he was born on the third moon of Venus or some such place.
You want Obama out? Then there is only one way you're going to accomplish it - produce solid evidence that he's lying and wasn't born in Hawaii as he claimed. Start waving that around and you'll get your day in court. And you won't need legal standing to get it.
I have humped those hills in North Georgia as an aggressor against the studs.It was an ass whoopin experience to say the least and I was in my 20s.
Dahlonega is no place for the meek.
Yes, Contract Law provides Standing to every citizen.
Every day bo creates Standing for more and more people by his Torts.
There are also Theories of Equity which provide Standing.
And I trust you all are aware of Constitutional Provisions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.