Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why We Love Bobby Jindal
rushlimbaugh.com ^ | 2-25-09 | rush limbaugh

Posted on 02/25/2009 2:17:59 PM PST by cdchik123

RUSH: Now, a couple words here about Bobby Jindal. There's a great disconnect, ladies and gentlemen, between the Beltway pundits in the Drive-By Media -- and I, sadly, have to include the Fox News All Stars in this. We live in a world obviously where style counts for more than anything else, and that's not good. Obama's a great stylist, a great orator, who gave great speech last night. But if you listen to it, it was meaningless. It had all kinds of lies.

Those of us who studied Obama know exactly what he's going to do. He's going to grow the government as big as he can. He's going to expand the government sector. He's going to do it at the expense of the high end of the private sector. He's going to do this. He's got the votes, by the way. If his speech created a bump in his approval numbers, he's got the votes to do anything he wants. He can do cap-and-trade, and he can do health care reform in 30 days. He can do socialized medicine. He can do whatever he wants as soon as he wants depending on the bump and the bounce he gets out of this speech, and I fully expect that the Drive-Bys will run polls showing that his approval numbers are way, way up. But the market is way, way down.

(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; gopresponse; howdydoody; jindal; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
Again, the people with skin in the game heard the speech last night, and they don't like it. The market is down. It's vacillating around 150, minus 150 today. It's been around 180 or 122. It started out at minus 14. Now it's at minus 151. So the people with skin in the game, the people who invest their money to try to grow the economy are not digging what they heard last night. That continues to be the case with real people who make the country work. So we have a great stylist, a great orator who makes a great symbolic speech, wows everybody with his style. Everybody is falling all over themselves last night to praise Barack Obama in new ways that they think he hasn't been praised. "Elegant," he was... I forget some of the things. But I'm sure you were frustrated listening to it. Then Bobby Jindal came on, and everybody trashed Bobby Jindal. "That was the worst response I've ever seen. Why, that was horrible! Well, this is embarrassing. Why, get him off! This is rotten. He blew his chance," and so forth. It's very mistaken to have that impression of Bobby Jindal.

more http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_022509/content/01125108.guest.html

1 posted on 02/25/2009 2:17:59 PM PST by cdchik123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

He’s doing a great job on Hannity right now.


2 posted on 02/25/2009 2:19:31 PM PST by rightinthemiddle (Without the Mainstream Media, the Left is Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

I thought Bobby Jindal did exceptionally well. He clearly stated the differences between the Elephants and the Jack@sses. Elephants are renown for long memory, while Jack@sses, well we all know don’t we?

Jindal clearly defined the GOP in his response.


3 posted on 02/25/2009 2:22:22 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

He certainly is. I’m listening now. Sean played the fawning media’s statements about him, even the “Oh, God!” statement and he just laughed at it. He then said that if he had come on there with a speech about more government spending, the media would have praised him.

He is impressive.


4 posted on 02/25/2009 2:22:33 PM PST by Sister_T (The Obama Administration = EPIC FAIL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
I agree with him about O's speech. Jindal is another matter. It wasn't just style and presentation, it was, to me, about content and emphasis.

After he got everyone snoring about his history and heaping praise on the opposition, he manged to sneak in the real content that might appeal to a sensible person. He put it in in low, barely audible terms and I'm sure, if anyone had stayed tuned until then, the message was unintelligible or, at the minimum, not well emphasized as to stick in their mind.

JMO

5 posted on 02/25/2009 2:23:05 PM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

I thought he did fine. Sure as hell better than Nancy Pelosi after a Bush speech.


6 posted on 02/25/2009 2:23:22 PM PST by dragonblustar (Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God - G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

My mother who is not a political person liked Bobby Jindal. She thinks people will prefer someone like him after a couple of years of Obama.


7 posted on 02/25/2009 2:23:27 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

But... if Rush had his style of delivery, Rush would not have a radio show that was successful. Bobby needs work on his delivery.


8 posted on 02/25/2009 2:24:34 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism, it's the new black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Here’s an idea for Rush: get Alan Keyes on his program for at least the first hour, and have Keyes explain in DETAIL why 0bama is a Communist (per Keyes’ recent statements), and why 0bama MUST be made to prove his Constitutional eligibility to serve as POTUS.

Rush? You got any stones man?

Here’s how you demonstrate that. Any talk show host can say that 0bama ‘lies’, but YOU have the ability to expose the most fundemental 0bama-lie of all.

Somehow I suspect that all we’re going to hear are crickets chirping.


9 posted on 02/25/2009 2:24:44 PM PST by mkjessup (You're either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Jindal is fine, and will be fine. Great articulator of conservatism.

That silly speech last night won’t be remembered.


10 posted on 02/25/2009 2:25:18 PM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
All right and good... I think no one here is in disagreement that Obama was babbling a pack of lies, while Jindal was giving a response based on conservative principles.

BUT this speech was supposed to be,

a) a refutation of Obamarat policy to destroy America

b) to introduce Jindal to the national public with obvious glanes towards 2012

He did not deliver. The speech while better on substance than the Obamacrap, since truthful, was badly delivered and marred by undue praising of Obama.

While Jindal is a fine guy, the speech was not.

Just forget it, move on and do better next time. This isn't the end of the world, but we shouldn't try to spin it into a brilliant masterpiece.

11 posted on 02/25/2009 2:26:30 PM PST by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TCats

This is how he talks all the time. Maybe I’m just used to hearing it because I’m from Louisiana. When Hurricane Gustiv and Ike were threatening our shores last fall, he was all over the TV talking and talking giving very detailed information about what we should do and what the state was doing.

And frankly, I don’t know what all the hoopla is about how much Obama is such a fabulous speaker. I’ve never understood it.


12 posted on 02/25/2009 2:26:48 PM PST by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

He was unusually nervous last night. Not sure why because he normally does a good job of looking confident.

Maybe he was over coached.


13 posted on 02/25/2009 2:26:56 PM PST by Roux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TCats
I just heard Jindal on with Hannity. He was terrific. Saw him this morning on The Today Show. Terrific.

I think we'll just have to attribute last night's performance to nerves?

I mean, look at where Obama was at Jindal's age.

14 posted on 02/25/2009 2:27:02 PM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

There was no pizazz because he was in a room alone. His ideas were great and his delivery was above average. When he gets a chance to put this pitch in front of a crowd he will light it up. Good job Gov.


15 posted on 02/25/2009 2:28:28 PM PST by mortal19440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
The text of Bobby's speech was excellent. The delivery could have been a better, but the criticism is way, way, way over the top. It reminds me of the over-the-top criticism of Sarah Palin. Coincidence? Hmmm, the only connection I can think of is that they're both rising stars in the GOP and the conservative movement.
16 posted on 02/25/2009 2:28:28 PM PST by Califelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roux

I think that format sucks. Rarely does anyone look good.

Believe me, if Jindal debates Obama, it will be an absolute blood bath.


17 posted on 02/25/2009 2:29:43 PM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: exist
I'll give him that. I just lament the loss of a very good opportunity to get the reality of Obama out. Conservatives don't get many of these unfiltered moments in front of very, very large audiences often and I'm frustrated at what I think was the lost opportunity
18 posted on 02/25/2009 2:31:48 PM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Sorry to say that I disagree with Rush on this one... First time (okay second time).

He is/has become just another of the insider Republican politicians (used to be an outsider) probably due to his association with said junkies... He gave a poor response - even though he does better ad-lib, and he deserves the let-down from Conservatives.

I would have much preferred some fiery non-politician to actually respond to the horrible spending and stupid plans of this administration - but, what can you expect. They have to go along with the perceived polls I’d guess...

Too bad... I use to think that he had a good chance because he was NOT of the current political class - but they apparently got hold of him and changed his ways...


19 posted on 02/25/2009 2:33:33 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Big Guy, don’t pee on my leg and tell me it’s raining. You are not The Most Dangerous Man In America merely because you are an ardent, principled conservative. You are The Most Dangerous Man In America because you can be all that in a good-natured, entertaining manner. Substance matters. But so does style. Bobby Jindal needs to work on his style.


20 posted on 02/25/2009 2:34:10 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson