Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montanajoe

The thread is referring to the filing of facts by a paralegal swearing to how she was rteated. You tried to misconstrue that in your post #6 and blame the attorneys for not filing. Want to try again? ... Have you met Star Traveler?


57 posted on 02/25/2009 6:36:29 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

Sorry I bothered to post. The pleading that was required was a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the motion to dismiss by the Defendants. The judge in this matter interpreted the pleading that was filed as being filed by a paralegal. The judge then gave the Plaintiff’s until tomorrow at 5 pm to file the the correct responsive pleading or show cause why the case should not be dismissed.


71 posted on 02/25/2009 6:53:35 PM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN; montanajoe

You said — “Have you met Star Traveler?”

Ummm..., MHGinTN — I don’t believe you have even met me... LOL...

[... at least I’m not suffering from Obama Derangement Syndrome... ]


115 posted on 02/26/2009 11:09:36 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson