Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollister v Soetoro DISMISSED (US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - 3/5/09)
scribd ^ | 3/5/2009 | rxisd

Posted on 03/05/2009 1:52:30 PM PST by rxsid

ORDER For the reasons set forth in an accompanying memorandum, the defendants' motion to dismiss [#9] is granted, and John D. Hemenway is ordered to show cause within eleven days of the date of this order why he should not be sanctioned under Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13033216/Dismissed


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: akaobama; berg; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; hollister; hollistervsoetoro; obama; philipberg; soetoro; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-350 next last
To: mrmeangenes

Where is the proof that he was born in the US? Have you — or anyone — seen a birth certificate, stating that Dr. SO-and-So delivered a healthy male child at XXX hour on XXX day at XXX hospital?


61 posted on 03/05/2009 3:51:47 PM PST by JoeA (JoeA / welcome to third world politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Barry's Version looks nothing like this

Decosta Short Form COLB:

http://s305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/?action=view&current=doc_decosta_pat_birth.jpg

Looking at his version, you can not even come close to reading the state seal of HI (like you can this one) cause it's not there.

62 posted on 03/05/2009 3:55:35 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
That is a great quote. This judge indeed has a sharp tongue. I hope he slaps a giant fine of Berg and his minions.

Yeah, but where is the damn BC? Not that derivative instrument, fake or no, which was posted on the internet, but the real thing. Or are you saying the American public has no right to ask as long as its your guy doing the stonewalling?

63 posted on 03/05/2009 3:59:08 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Why didn't he post that same version on his campaign web site?

My guess would be bandwidth issues. Since the high resolution versions were made available to the public, what other reason can you think of for resizing the image placed on the Fight the Smears site?

Here's why, the version that was posted on the Barry friendly web sites doesn't have an official state seal either.

Yes, it does. You don't even need to apply any sort of image enhancement to see it.

Perhaps you need a better monitor or eyeglasses?


64 posted on 03/05/2009 3:59:36 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Supreme Court is obviously complicit in the take over and collapse of USA. Tar, Feathers, Pitchforks, Rocks, and last resort, use your imagination but this must be stopped.


65 posted on 03/05/2009 4:00:07 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
"Where's Barry's 1961 Long form Certificate of Live Birth???? "


66 posted on 03/05/2009 4:02:55 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
"This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to do. Even in its relatively short life the case has excited the blogosphere and the conspiracy theorists. The right thing to do is to bring it to an early end."

The day I believe anything a Clintonite judge says about the law is the day hell freezes over.

Clinton's federal judge appointments are notoriously partisan. There was the Clinton judge that took shots at Sarah Palin from the bench!: Judge: Palin Used Her Child As a 'Prop', there was the Clinton appointee that "judged" Free Republic, and there are many other examples of partisan Democrat activity on the bench by Clinton appointees.

This Robertson character was himself part of a little club during the Clinton administration, as Alamo-Girl documents, he was part of "The Magnificent Seven", a group of the first seven Clinton appointees to the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Being sanctioned or attacked by Robertson in the Obama case is like Dred Scott being caned by Roger B. Taney for being "uppity".

It's pretty much a forgone conclusion with that corrupt little crew in the D.C. District Court.

67 posted on 03/05/2009 4:03:54 PM PST by an amused spectator (Obama: Beware of geeks bearing grifts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
I hope he slaps a giant fine of Berg and his minions.

I hope the day comes when people like you quit pretending to uphold the constitution.

68 posted on 03/05/2009 4:04:32 PM PST by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
His does not look like this:


69 posted on 03/05/2009 4:04:58 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Michael Michael

70 posted on 03/05/2009 4:05:29 PM PST by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Michael Michael

Welcome to Free Republic! Hope the pay and bennies are pretty good!


71 posted on 03/05/2009 4:07:12 PM PST by an amused spectator (Obama: Beware of geeks bearing grifts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Factchecks looks nothing like the other, Decosta COLB which contains the state seal

Your right, there's something there. In that ver7 high resolution pic, can you read the state seal like you can of the much smaller seal in the Decosta image? No. That isn't the state seal. Who needs the glasses?

72 posted on 03/05/2009 4:11:38 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Barry's Version looks nothing like this

Decosta Short Form COLB:

http://s305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/?action=view&current=doc_decosta_pat_birth.jpg

Looking at his version, you can not even come close to reading the state seal of HI (like you can this one) cause it's not there.


No, it's there. Again, you can see it without image enhancement in the high resolution images. It's not as obvious, but it's there. And there's nothing unusual about it not being so obvious. It's all about the scanner and scanner settings.

Here, take a look at this. This is a scanned image of a genuine Hawaiian COLB provided to Polarik by a woman named Michelle. The image is located on Polarik's own PhotoBucket album:

http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/MCOLB-80-50.jpg

Where's the seal? Do you see it? Is this a fake COLB?

No. Just that the particular scanner and settings used to do this scan didn't pick up the seal. To pick up the seal, shadows have to be created, and the light source on this scanner was pretty direct so it didn't create sufficient shadows that could be picked up by the scanner.

When this scan was made available to the public, someone suggested that Michelle go over the seal with some pencil lead to make it visible.

Here's the subsequent scan, showing the seal. Again, this image is right there on Polarik's Photo Bucket album, and I was there when this whole thing was going on.

http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/SKMBT_C45008071717410.jpg


73 posted on 03/05/2009 4:12:49 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
His does not look like this:

Because his wasn't likely scanned on the same scanner with the same scanner settings.

However there is absolutely nothing unusual about his when compared with the scanned image of another Hawaiian COLB provided by Michelle.


74 posted on 03/05/2009 4:15:17 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
You have the right to ask for it. You don't have the right to force Obama to produce it. Not through the court.

Are you saying this is not a legal matter?

75 posted on 03/05/2009 4:16:14 PM PST by this is my country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey; popdonnelly; NavVet; the_Watchman; bossmechanic; mrmeangenes; Diogenesis; curiosity; ...
Ruh roh. Sanctions for this attorney are unavoidable. Disbarment isn’t out of the question. Federal courts don’t play games.

Robertson is a well-known Democrat thug:

Judge James Robertson - DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON (STRANGE JUSTICE SUBSECTION), as shown by FR's own Alamo-Girl.

BTW, welcome to Free Republic, mrmeangenes! ;-)

76 posted on 03/05/2009 4:18:43 PM PST by an amused spectator (Obama: Beware of geeks bearing grifts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Michael Michael
There's no official state seal on Barry's version on any of his friendly web sites. I've provided the images. You can clearly see what they are trying to pass off as the state seal is 1) totally illegible, no reference to state of HI and 2) who know what COLB that came from because in that very high res shot of the fake seal, you can't tell who's COLB it's on.
77 posted on 03/05/2009 4:18:47 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Michael Michael

By the way...have you seen in 1961 long form Certificate?


78 posted on 03/05/2009 4:19:47 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Furthermore...look at the spacing of the two outer rings. In the Decosta image there is a definate space between the two. In the Barry image the rings virtually touch each other. Not only is it an obvious fake (can come close to reading anything on the high res fake), but it’s a terrible fake job at that.


79 posted on 03/05/2009 4:22:56 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: this is my country
Are you saying this is not a legal matter?

The Constitution (and federal statute) ultimately leaves it up to the political process.

If voters aren't satisfied that he's eligible, they can choose not to vote for him. If any of the electors have any issues, same thing. Congress, when certifying the electoral votes can submit objections to those votes. If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has any issues, they can choose to refuse to administer the oath of office.

But enough voters voted for Obama to appoint the requisite number of electors, and the requisite number of electors cast their votes for Obama, and Congress certified those votes without objection, and Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath of office without objection.

So here we are.

Only avenue left is removal from office by way of conviction of impeachment as per Article II, Section 4.


80 posted on 03/05/2009 4:23:11 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson