Skip to comments.
"Profit's to Earnings Ratio"
republican reporter ^
| Bob Schultz
Posted on 03/08/2009 10:04:02 AM PDT by jessduntno
"Profit's to Earnings Ratio"
Yesterday, President Obama stated, "Profit and earning ratios are starting to get to the point where buying stocks is a potentially good deal if youve got a long-term perspective on it,
The President was likely speaking to the "P/E" ratio which is used to measure companies against each other. But P/E ratio does not stand for "Profits" and "Earnings". It stands for "Price/Earnings". This is the measure by which a stock price is compared to the earnings per share of that same firm.
Hence, a firm that has a stock price of $5/share, and earns $.50/share has a P/E ratio of 10 (5/.50). Alternatively, a firm that trades at $40, and has profits of $2/share has a P/E of 20. The lower the P/E ratio the more attractive is the stock price.
Obama's gaffe is laughable if it weren't so frightening. It's indicative of his ability to pontificate on a subject in which he has little or no background or understanding.
In fact, Obama's background offers a disturbing vision of how he views America. The majority of Obama's adult life was spent on the South Side of Chicago. This section of the Windy City is a dichotomy of liberal elites, safely ensconced in their Hyde Park enclave, surrounded by the misery and despair of the Chicago slums.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.republicanreporter.com ...
TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: onthejobtraining; zero; zeronomics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
While the two neighborhoods could not be more economically diverse, they share many commonalities:
1. There are no manufacturing firms, or companies that employ a large workforce.
2. Few if any new businesses are ever opened, in either neighborhood.
3. The few residents that do start an entrepreneurial venture, quickly move to other locals, where the taxes are lower, and the streets are safer.
4.
And, finally, and most importantly, the residents only see relief and economic opportunity come from the outside - in the form of grants for the University, or government relief for the inner city residents.
This final commonality is the most dangerous one, and one to which President Obama seems to have embraced. Looking at the world through South Chicago eyes has given the President a huge blind spot to the core of America's Economic engine - small businesses.
That failure to understand the basic principles that build a business, a neighborhood, a community and a nation offer little hope for restoring America's economic future.
His programs and ideas, so far, clearly point to an America that not only turns its back on small business, but drives it from the community.
America's future can already be seen in a drive through Chicago's South Side; a place where the difference between "Profits/Earnings Ratio" and "Price/Earnings Ratio" really doesn't matter.
This is just a nightmare...
To: jessduntno
Profits to Earnings Ratio What a wanker.
2
posted on
03/08/2009 10:05:42 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
To: Steely Tom
The most underrated story of the week. Bush would have been laughed out of town with such a remark.
Hypocrites.
3
posted on
03/08/2009 10:07:37 AM PDT
by
mwl8787
To: jessduntno
4
posted on
03/08/2009 10:08:21 AM PDT
by
Vasilli22
To: jessduntno
The people who voted for this moron are just as stupid as he is, and if they aren’t they don’t care because they are socialists like him. The religion of socialism trumps all.
To: mwl8787
The only people who’d think so didn’t vote for him anyway.
6
posted on
03/08/2009 10:09:28 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
To: Steely Tom
The profits to earnings ratio has been pretty constant at 1 for quit a while now. If the One can change it that would be nothing short of a miracle.
7
posted on
03/08/2009 10:13:53 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: jessduntno
One doesn’t have to understand P/E ratios or anything else about the economy if the agenda is simply to destroy the nation, and in doing so to create chaos in the world.
To: Steely Tom
"Profits to Earnings Ratio" What does that even mean?
Now compare that to my own mangling of the Vulcan benediction supposed bestowed by Spock - "Live well and prosper."
What Spock actually said was "Live long and prosper."
Beam me up, Scottie.
9
posted on
03/08/2009 10:20:15 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Obama was lying, your rights are dying)
To: Steely Tom
Profits to Earnings Ratio
What a wanker.
Imagine if Bush did this...
10
posted on
03/08/2009 10:20:46 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
(Tea Party Tax Revolt List:: http://www.freerepublic.com/~jessduntno/)
To: jessduntno
“This is just a nightmare...”
AGREED.
11
posted on
03/08/2009 10:21:38 AM PDT
by
gibsosa
To: DManA
if he can tax away the earnings, the profits/earning ratio might slip a tad!
Any chance he thinks the price of a stock is the profit?
12
posted on
03/08/2009 10:21:46 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose")
To: mwl8787
Yep- and it was discussed in the WH briefing, with no comment on the stupidity of Mr Expert at Everything, Barack Odingle.
13
posted on
03/08/2009 10:23:55 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(Both parties have destroyed this economy. Dems in charge now, and we are doomed.)
To: jessduntno
The scary part isn’t that Obama didn’t know what P/E means. The scary part is that he has no advisors who even know what economic acronyms mean nonetheless how the actual economy works.
14
posted on
03/08/2009 10:23:58 AM PDT
by
douginthearmy
(Julio is the face of the new Amerika. Time to start over.)
To: silverleaf
Any chance he thinks the price of a stock is the profit?Cripes...you might be right...there is no telling...I don't think it was covered in any of the Saul Alinsky books, he really has no clue...
15
posted on
03/08/2009 10:24:13 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
(Tea Party Tax Revolt List:: http://www.freerepublic.com/~jessduntno/)
To: Steely Tom
IIRC, he said "...profit and earnings ratio...." proving he not only does not know what the "P" stands for, but has no concept of a ratio.
16
posted on
03/08/2009 10:25:43 AM PDT
by
Roccus
(The Capitol, the White House, the Court house.....................America's Axis of Evil!)
To: douginthearmy
The scary part isnt that Obama didnt know what P/E means. The scary part is that he has no advisors who even know what economic acronyms mean nonetheless how the actual economy works.
The other scary thing is that he might end up talking about a P&L as a Profit and Lost Statement and end up being correct...
17
posted on
03/08/2009 10:29:31 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
(Tea Party Tax Revolt List:: http://www.freerepublic.com/~jessduntno/)
To: mwl8787
"bush"
Imagine that comment together with the Obama's shabby treatment of the British P.M.
To: jessduntno
did he make this gaffe with a teleprompter? If so, was it misread or was it the actual text?
19
posted on
03/08/2009 10:39:53 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: jessduntno
What good is a PE ratio if Obozo nationalizes everything?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson