Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate-Backed Stimulus Bill Contains Birth Control Bailout for Planned Parenthood
Life News ^ | March 11, 2009 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 03/11/2009 9:09:03 AM PDT by GonzoII

Senate-Backed Stimulus Bill Contains Birth Control Bailout for Planned Parenthood

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
March 11
, 2009

Email

RSS

Print

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The so-called economic stimulus bill the Senate approved on Tuesday contains a bailout package for Planned Parenthood that will give the abortion giant hundreds of millions of dollars to promote birth control. President Barack Obama is soon expected to sign the bill into law.

Specifically, a provision buried deep in the legislation clears the way for expanded federal funding of contraceptives through Medicaid for those who aren't even poor.

A Clinton-era program allows states to seek a waiver to offer Medicaid “family planning” services -- including people who are not poor enough to qualify for Medicaid. If they seek the waiver, the federal government matches the state funding with $9 for every $1.

Naturally, Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards was elated by the news.

"We finally did it. It wasn't easy, but after two long years of working with Congress, I'm happy to report [the provision was included]," Richards told supporters in an email.

Richards made the provision appear as if it inflated the price of birth control for women even though the lack of the provision merely failed to give Planned Parenthood a taxpayer-funded reimbursement for providing birth control at reduced costs to some women.

The House included the Planned Parenthood bailout in its version of the spending bill, but Obama had to instruct House Democrats to remove the provision because it engendered so much opposition it threatened to derail the bill.

Senate Democrats snuck the provision back in the measure they have sent to Obama and with the Senate having a more pro-abortion makeup, the provision remained in the legislation without much of a fight.

As a result, all 50 states will now offer Medicaid “family planning” services (including contraception) with the federal government offering the same $9 to $1 match. Although the money doesn't fund abortions directly, it goes to Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion business, which would otherwise have to spend its own money on contraception.

Pro-life advocates say the governmental funds free up Planned Parenthood dollars to promote and perform abortions that it would otherwise have to spend on family planning.

House Republican Leader John Boehner told LifeNews.com during the House debate on the provision that he was dismayed by it.

"Regardless of where anyone stands on taxpayer-funding for contraceptives and the abortion industry, there is no doubt that this once little-known provision in the congressional Democrats’ spending plan has nothing to do with stimulating the economy and creating more American jobs," he said.

"How you can spend hundreds of millions of dollars on contraceptives – how does that stimulate the economy? You can go through a whole host of issues that have nothing to do with growing jobs in America and helping people keep their jobs," he added.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said after the hubhub about the provision in the House bill, "While [Obama] agrees that greater access to family planning is good policy, the president believes that the funding for it does not belong in the economic recovery and reinvestment plan."

However, that will not likely prevent him from signing the Senate-passed spending bill anyway.

The House debate on the provision also contained an interesting moment which saw House Speaker Nancy Pelosi defending the provision and appearing to indicate she thought children were a burden to the economy.

"Well, the family-planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost," she said on ABC.

That drew guffaws from groups throughout the pro-life movement.



Printed from: http://www.lifenews.com/nat4899.html


Copyright © 2003-2006 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved. For free daily/weekly pro-life news, email us at news@LifeNews.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionfunding; bho2009; bho44; bhoabortion; birthcontrol; democrats; economy; fundingtheleft; medicaid; moralabsolutes; plannedparenthood; porkulus; prolife; stimulus
 Who is like unto God?
1 posted on 03/11/2009 9:09:03 AM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Should have bailed out before the stimulus happened.


2 posted on 03/11/2009 9:13:39 AM PDT by blueyon (Obama, the honeymoon is over, I WANT A DIVORCE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Is this post over a month late? Or just a day late?

Is it about H.R.1, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009? Or is this about H.R.1105, The Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009?

No offense, this is a very dubious "news" story with a date of 3-11-2009. No stimulus bill was on the agenda this Tuesday. The Senate did pass the Omnibus spending bill on Tuesday evening.

But further, there were no changes made between the House version and the Senate version of the Omnibus Spending bill. All amendments were defeated, and the Senate passed exactly what the House passed.

Mr. Steven Ertelt has some facts seriously wrong here. Either the House did pass this, and the Senate reaffirmed it, or this stuff was removed in the House and never added in the Senate.

At this point, it doesn't really matter. Obama signed the Omnibus spending bill today, and the ARRA back on February 17th.

The time to get this information out is before the bills pass. While amendments can still be made. This story is completely useless.

3 posted on 03/11/2009 9:46:35 AM PDT by cc2k (When less than half the voters pay taxes, it's called "taxation without representation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 03/11/2009 1:21:59 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Abort the stimulus


5 posted on 03/11/2009 1:47:49 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (The more Obummer does, the more I believe it's on purpose...to destroy America. No one is that dumb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Pinged from Terri Dailies


6 posted on 03/11/2009 4:31:27 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k; wagglebee; All

Anyone know what the deal is?


7 posted on 03/11/2009 7:31:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Sorry, I don't have time to look everything up right now. And I'm on dialup, so getting the text of all versions of these bills is tough here.

I can tell you how to find out what the story is. Go to each version on Thomas (links below) and click on the "Printer Friendly Display" link for each version. That will pull up the entire text of that version. Then search for words like "contraceptive" and "birth control" and see if there's any hits in there.

Here's links to all versions of H.R.1, the ARRA (aka the stimulus package):

And here are the versions of the Omnibus Spending bill (H.R.1105):

Someone else will have to do the research on the bill text. My lunch break is over, and it takes 10 to 20 minutes per version for me to get the full text on my slow link.
8 posted on 03/12/2009 9:41:05 AM PDT by cc2k (When less than half the voters pay taxes, it's called "taxation without representation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Thank you very much! I sure didn’t want anyone to do research on my account; I thought maybe someone might already know. If I can find anything I’ll post it.


9 posted on 03/12/2009 7:09:52 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson