Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Carolina Judge Assaults Mother's Right - ALAN KEYES
America's Independent Party ^ | March 12, 2009 | Alan Keyes

Posted on 03/12/2009 7:34:22 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2009 7:34:22 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Here we go again.......


2 posted on 03/12/2009 7:37:05 AM PDT by borntobeagle (April 1st....sin taxes are thrown away..excuse my nicotine rants!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I would love to compare these Home-schooled kid’s scores on basic aptitude tests compared to their public school counterparts.


3 posted on 03/12/2009 7:40:02 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasonGal

FYI


4 posted on 03/12/2009 7:40:54 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I can't understand why this man cannot get elected to something,........ anything. He sounds radical to most people because he has "founding father" type qualities. Isn't that desirable in a candidate today?

He could have been our first "black" president. I tried.

5 posted on 03/12/2009 7:42:17 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I don’t understand why the judge was ruling on anything at all. What action was before him and who brought it?


6 posted on 03/12/2009 7:43:56 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Usually the HSLDA is involved in cases like this. I havent heard anything from them, yet.


7 posted on 03/12/2009 7:45:22 AM PDT by ChocChipCookie ("Let his days be few, and let another take his office." Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

bump and *ping*

Further confirming that “no” for any potential move to NC.


8 posted on 03/12/2009 7:45:36 AM PDT by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: borntobeagle

When to comes to raising children, Mothers know best.


9 posted on 03/12/2009 7:45:55 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

In a divorce proceeding the father is against homeschooling.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91397

The judge, when contacted by WND, explained his goal in ordering the children to register and attend a public school was to make sure they have a “more well-rounded education.”

“I thought Ms. Mills had done a good job [in homeschooling],” he said. “It was great for them to have that access, and [I had] no problems with homeschooling. I said public schooling would be a good complement.”

The judge said the husband has not been supportive of his wife’s homeschooling, and “it accomplished its purposes. It now was appropriate to have them back in public school.”

Mangum said he made the determination on his guiding principle, “What’s in the best interest of the minor children,” and conceded it was putting his judgment in place of the mother’s.

And he said that while he expressed his opinion from the bench in the court hearing, the final written order had not yet been signed.

However, the practice of a judge replacing a parent’s judgment with his own regarding homeschooling was argued recently when a court panel in California ruled that a family would no longer be allowed to homeschool their own children.


10 posted on 03/12/2009 7:46:55 AM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

>>I can’t understand why this man cannot get elected to something,........ anything. He sounds radical to most people because he has “founding father” type qualities. Isn’t that desirable in a candidate today?

He could have been our first “black” president. I tried.<<

I have always admired Dr. Keyes. He is not afraid to speak out on what he thinks is right, and that rubs a lot of people the wrong way. The last 20 years really haven’t been kind to Keyes, since he worked for the Reagan White House, but hopefully, now the time is right for someone like him who is not afraid to speak up for what he thinks is right. I’ll support him all the way.

FWIW, that web site is tremendous and I have been reading it everyday for the last few weeks.


11 posted on 03/12/2009 7:47:56 AM PDT by Clarence (back to lurking now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
I believe this is a divorce action. If the kids go with mom. the judge wants to inject himself into their education. If they go with dad, they will go to public school.<p. I'm not sure, but I think they went with the dad so they will go to public school. That means the mom home schooling them puts her on the level of a crak ho.
12 posted on 03/12/2009 7:48:03 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

It seems the dad is driving this. The judge is also the judge handling the parent’s divorce.


13 posted on 03/12/2009 7:48:35 AM PDT by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
It may be to our credit that we speak of these things calmly, and seek to settle them by peaceful means in our courts of law.

I think it is growing less & less to our credit all the time.

14 posted on 03/12/2009 7:49:37 AM PDT by Sloth (The tree of liberty desperately needs watering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“Parents will be required, without exception to surrender their children for indoctrination by the state.”

At which point, “parents will be required” to “shoot the bastards that show up on the doorstep to enforce this action.”


15 posted on 03/12/2009 7:50:19 AM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
Sorry. I forgot to embed the link into the article.

Judge orders homeschoolers into public district classrooms
Decides children need more 'focus' despite testing above grade levels

16 posted on 03/12/2009 7:50:38 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Pro-choice for states is pro-choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: swain_forkbeard

From what I recall it’s a divorce and one partner is now opposed to home schooling. No doubt because it limits time with the children.


18 posted on 03/12/2009 7:51:34 AM PDT by stockpirate (A people unwilling to use violent force to defend liberty deserves the tyrant that rules them SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
these kids regularly tested 1-2 years ahead of their peers.

I am not surprised at all of this. I attended private schools most of my life except my freshman year in high school (due to a move). I was put in all the advanced classes, yet I recall that most of what was taught I already studied in the fifth or sixth grade in private schools.

19 posted on 03/12/2009 7:52:49 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clarence

I think his eloquence and passion scare most people. Just as Reagan scared many people, I don’t think the average voter will ever give him a shot at anything. Even many Freepers here will pile onto him if he ever gets a foothold in Federal politics. He lives in Chicago, so he is in conservative oblivion. He ran against Obama for Senate and I don’t think he got 30%. That’s a modern day “George Washington” against a mental midget and we get the midget.


20 posted on 03/12/2009 7:55:43 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson