Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush is not the right leader for the Reagan Revolution Phase Two
Striptorium Daily ^ | 4 March 2009 | John Mark Reynolds

Posted on 03/12/2009 11:22:07 AM PDT by AreaMan

Rush is not the right leader for the Reagan Revolution Phase Two

John Mark Reynolds
Politics

03.04.2009

Rush has enviable radio talent. He reaches out to a big group of people every week and edutains them.

He has his reward and needs no further praise. I am not going to let leftists force me to throw Rush under the bus, but they cannot force me to make him the driver either.

Suppose you want to see some of his ideas, such as pro-life and small government, win.

Suppose you want to see the Reagan Revolution continue or expand to new groups.

Rush is the wrong guy to feature. Featuring him as “leader” or “public intellectual” is a misuse of his talent. He can help create the conditions for change, but he cannot lead it.

Let me make my point using an analogy from the Revolutionary War.

Sam Adam was a great guy and genuine patriot who now has a decent beer named after him. He was a leader in the early stages of the Revolution who sacrificed his all for the Cause. He was personally brave and an effective rabble rouser. Revolutions need a Sam Adams like they need air.

If, however, he had become the face for the Revolution in those days, we might very well have lost. He could not appeal (and turned off) many people we needed on our team. Instead, Washington became the face of the revolution and our leader and the Revolution was saved.

This irritated many purists who wanted the more “in your face” approach of the Sam Adams set. Sadly for Adams, but perhaps fortunately for the Revolution, he was physically unable to challenge the more moderate leadership of the Patriot Cause.

A Sam Adams can create a revolution, but he cannot lead a successful one.

Notice that by “moderate” voice, I do NOT mean compromised or wimpy. Washington was a patriot willing to sacrifice everything for the cause. He was also the patriot the British feared, because he was impossible to dismiss.

America found a champion that even our foes had to admit was sterling.

It matters to get the right Face Man. Ideally (see Washington, George) your Face Man is also your Fighting Leader, but you simply cannot have the Sam Adams types being your public persona or a good many of the Virginians and nice Pennsylvanians you need to win will turn away from you.

Rush as party leader or Voice of Conservatism is in the wrong role. He is Sam Adams cast as Washington.

Bad move for Rush and for us.

*Editors Note: Listen to John Mark Reynolds discuss Rush at Scriptorium’s podcast Middlebrow.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; reagan; revolution; rush; rushlimbaugh; talkradio; waronrush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2009 11:22:08 AM PDT by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Obama tried to declare Rush the de facto head of the REPUBLICAN party.

Rush, while flattered, has declined the offer.

The author really should deal with the facts as they are.


2 posted on 03/12/2009 11:24:34 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
Mr Reynolds....the rats have appointed Rush as a leader.
He did not assume nor accept YOUR assessment
3 posted on 03/12/2009 11:25:47 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Not really surprising. Just more proof that whatever lie a liberal states becomes truth to many.


4 posted on 03/12/2009 11:25:47 AM PDT by rintense (Go Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Rush is doing a great job. He is a conservative ‘leader’ by default. Because there is no one else out there leading.


5 posted on 03/12/2009 11:26:05 AM PDT by GeronL (....and I won't let it happen again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

I agree. Although I admire and love him, he is pompous at times. And I don’t think average Americans appreciate hearing about giant gas-guzzling SUVs just for the sake of wasting fuel etc... And the glorious naked body thing is about as disgusting as it can get. I don’t want to hear that. But I do like the main message.

My wife says Sarah Palin is staying out of the limelight to avoid over-exposure. I pray she’s the next president.


6 posted on 03/12/2009 11:26:07 AM PDT by bicyclerepair (Thank you Mr. Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan; sinanju

No offense to the author, but he sounds like a philosophy professor, throws a lot of information out but in the end, it has no practical application.


7 posted on 03/12/2009 11:26:48 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

The author assumed facts not in evidence. The idiot should really learn the facts before mouthing off about them.


8 posted on 03/12/2009 11:27:18 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberalism is Communism, and both are a mental disorder. Grow up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
another progressive Republican....Reynolds....
9 posted on 03/12/2009 11:27:36 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

The left’s goal of distracting us is working so well. :(


10 posted on 03/12/2009 11:27:50 AM PDT by Tzimisce (http://groups.myspace.com/nailthemessiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
Unfortunately the Republican party is sadly lacking in George Washingtons right now. Quite a few Benedict Arnolds who will move to the other side given half a reason, but no George Washingtons.
11 posted on 03/12/2009 11:27:52 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Obama: removing the speed limit on the Road to Serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
I agree with all others have said before me; but it IS rather nice to hear REAL CONSERVATISM spoken for a REAL CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE IN ;-)
12 posted on 03/12/2009 11:27:54 AM PDT by NordP (CONSERVATIVE AGAIN IN 2010 ..... Now, is it 2012 yet ???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Whatever, the real question might really be is this; Who is the next Jefferson Davis/Robt. E. Lee?


13 posted on 03/12/2009 11:28:40 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Ok, no one is looking to do an exact carbon copy of 1776.

People aren’t waiting around until we have an exact clone of everyone from that time like we are filling roles in some historical reenactment play.

We go with who’s here, and their roles will fall into place.


14 posted on 03/12/2009 11:28:45 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (Conservatives see untapped potential. Liberals see Tapped-out hopelessness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

So, a guy with a podcast is going to tell us how to take in what Rush has to say?
Interesting...


15 posted on 03/12/2009 11:28:51 AM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

I don’t know if Rush is the right leader. He is the right guy to voice the concerns and desires of Conservatives right now, but I do know that John Mark Reynolds, whoever that is, is not the guy to decide who the right leader is.


16 posted on 03/12/2009 11:29:39 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

The important point is that the GOP needs leadership badly, political leadership. Right now, they’re floundering around while Obama is turning the country into a socialist state. Someone with conservative ideas and credentials has to come forward and take the helm as the moral and philosophical leader of the GOP. It happened after the peanut man Carter got elected in 1976 with Reagan, and it has to happen again for the party to win the next presidential election.


17 posted on 03/12/2009 11:30:00 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Site sponsored by: Torrey Honors Institute

Torrey Honors Institute is an exemplary liberal arts and biblical studies program for undergraduates at Biola University.

Somehow you have to wonder what a liberal arts studies program has to say about Republicans.


18 posted on 03/12/2009 11:30:05 AM PDT by edcoil (Slave owners could justify themselves too. Think about it Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Washington II is already there. That person just needs people to stop looking for him so he/she can emerge on his/her own.

Washington was not Washington because people were looking for him.


19 posted on 03/12/2009 11:31:37 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (Conservatives see untapped potential. Liberals see Tapped-out hopelessness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
Interesting take, with which I generally agree. The problem is, of course, that we haven't currently got a "Face Man."

More than that, however, neither Washington nor Adams would have been able to do anything without the intellectual foundations that had already been laid by many other members of the revolutionary leadership.

Indeed, those intellectual foundations were the difference between our revolution, and that of the French only a few years later.

If the revolution needed a "Face Man" who could also fight; they also needed one who was fully conversant with the philosophical underpinnings of what he was fighting for.

Ronald Reagan was that sort of man -- and he had the likes of Buckley, Kirk, and others to lay the intellectual foundations.

We need the "Face Man," sure. But even more, we need to refurbish our ideas.

20 posted on 03/12/2009 11:31:40 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson