Posted on 03/14/2009 2:50:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
(1) At the time of the November 4 election, Obama’ eligibility was unknown to the majority of the American electorate. That is, the vast majority of the American electorate did not know whether Obama was eligible to become the President of the United States (POTUS).
Furthermore Obama’s eligibility remains unknown, even to Americans who are very interested in this question, and have inquired deeply into it. When asked in court to produce evidence of his eligibility, Obama has declined to do so, even in the face of the considerable time, expense and trouble that is needed to avoid providing this evidence. Thus, the US citizenry did not know on November 4 if Obama was eligible, and they still do not know.
(2) Among the US citizenry are the following: The current POTUS The current VPOTUS & President of the Senate The US Supreme Court The US Congress The Senior Staff of the Pentagon The Senior Staff of the Federal Elections Commission The Members of the Electoral College
To best of my knowledge, none of these individuals have officially and publicly declared Obama to be eligible to be POTUS. They have not produced or provided sufficient evidence to prove this eligibility.
(3) The news media, television, radio, and the Internet transmit huge amounts of information each day. However, to the best of my knowledge the eligibility of Obama to be POTUS is not known by the general public (See Note 1).
Method of formal logic (4) Until and if that dissemination occurs, there is a method of formal logic that can be applied to this situation. It is called the Categorical Syllogism, and was described by Aristotle (Prior Analytics, 24b18-20). Ordinarily, a categorical syllogism is simply called a syllogism, as I shall do here.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Hey, I am on your side.
Calm down, I am discussing likely outcomes and possible strategy.
Yes, something will come of this. Checkout the Orly Taitz story where she has been successful in getting SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts to review her documents against Obama.
Yup and who crapped in your cheerios this morning. Have nice Day
We will NOT get over it!! NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE NO PEACE!!
You didn't read the article, did you? If you had you would kno that the One is NOT the POTUS no matter how many times you hear that he is or who says that he is. He's just a fixture in the White House pretending to be POTUS.
AT LEAST BIDEN IS NOT A MUSLIM
---Bill Richardson, Gov of NM, Sect of Commerce nominee.
A more interesting parallel:
Josef Stalin was a natural-born Georgian!
Sorry about that, but this is the issue that we know about and should not be dismissed as not strong enough to stand firm on.
Id love a nice rebellion to get this country back My main point was no one that should have got to the bottom of this did
Looks more authentic than the one he posted.
My point exactly, thank you.
FrogMom ~ You have a source for that? I'd love to see it.
Your wish is my command...
Having been ruled by a Prime Minister in Canada at one time, who somehow does resemble the new President, there may be another problem. I kept mulling over a word that will not leave. Perhaps I am overstating the case.
Dictionary.com -re Random House Dictionary. Random House 2009.
Fiat
1. An authoritative degree,sanction or order: a royal fiat.
2. A formula containing the word fiat,by which a person in authority gives sanction.
3.An arbitrary degree or pronouncement,esp by a person or group of persons having the absolute authority to enforce it: The king ruled by fiat.
There are a number of definitions on Dictionary.com of this word. I do hope for the Constitution of the United States of America. I just wonder if by sheer political will and force, with an obviously fragile press, that the powers that be, could enforce a fiat? ie: We are big enough to tell anyone what the rules are- our rules.
I pray that they will not.
Thank you, sir!
“If he is illegitimate he can’t be impeached. He will just be removed from the White House by US Marshals and share a room with Madoff.”
And if Orly reports this on her blog and calls the US Marshalls “Secret Service”, at least then no one will care or be freaked out by her mistake!
I don't think it is immature to having such reservations. The questions being asked go right back to the Constitution.
Ma'am...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.