Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House team to overhaul fiendish US tax code
AFP via Google ^

Posted on 03/25/2009 12:02:16 PM PDT by mnehring

WASHINGTON (AFP) — The White House Wednesday announced a new task force headed by former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker to reform the Byzantine US tax code in the hope of recouping billions in lost revenue.

White House budget chief Peter Orszag said Volcker and four other top economists will report their recommendations back to President Barack Obama by December 4, and their review will cover three main areas.

"One is tax simplification, the second is closing tax loopholes and reducing tax evasion, and the third is reducing corporate welfare," the director of the Office of Management and Budget told reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fairtax; howaboutfairtax; obama; taxcode; volcker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last
the second is closing tax loopholes...

I guess they haven't heard of the AMT?

1 posted on 03/25/2009 12:02:16 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Simplification #1:

1) Dems are exempt.


2 posted on 03/25/2009 12:05:08 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
in the hope of recouping billions in lost revenue.

Oh. To recoup lost revenue. Not because it's a burdensome, scatter-shot, impossible to comprehend, oppressive code.

Sure glad they have their priorities straight.

3 posted on 03/25/2009 12:05:10 PM PDT by SandyInSeattle (HOPE and CHANGE? More like BAIT and SWITCH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

there is a good plan already written and ready for implementation, perhaps in need of minor tweaking, and it is called THR FAIR TAX.

Go for it!!


4 posted on 03/25/2009 12:05:27 PM PDT by elpadre (nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

“One is tax simplification, the second is closing tax loopholes and reducing tax evasion, and the third is reducing corporate welfare,”...”

The third is their target.


5 posted on 03/25/2009 12:05:41 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

The real issue here are the 100 senators who sit there and insert line after line of tax code that they don’t understand but it helps their buddy who owns 2,000 acres of swamp in South Carolina or the guy who imports peanuts from Brazil.

My suggestion is rather simple...one flat tax and a limit on tax code of 288 lines (call it the “288-code). You can write as much as you want as a Senator to tax code....but after 288 lines....you merely overwrite what some other idiot wrote and theirs is no longer valid anymore. This is our problem.

When companies like AIG paid little or no taxes....it was the senate that made this possible. When Ford paid little to no taxes...it was the senate that made that possible. We need to take their code away....and make this so simple....that 3,000 IRS folks could run everything across the entire nation...and they’d only need a 8th grade education to read the tax code.


6 posted on 03/25/2009 12:07:12 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

there is a good plan already written and ready for implementation, perhaps in need of minor tweaking, and it is called THR FAIR TAX.

But, I wonder if the fair tax could start at say 10% and the corrupt and greedy government will vote to up it until it’s 50% - Who can trust the government anymore?


7 posted on 03/25/2009 12:09:45 PM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I can see offshore banking growing exponentially.


8 posted on 03/25/2009 12:10:32 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
My suggestion is rather simple...one flat tax

Their vision is also a flat tax, two part form.

How much did you earn?
What was your unearned income?

Add lines 1&2
Send it in.

9 posted on 03/25/2009 12:11:18 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 65 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I get hit by the AMT every year - and I have no loopholes. I do the 1040 really EZ - how much did you make? Send it in.


10 posted on 03/25/2009 12:13:44 PM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I get hit by the AMT every year - and I have no loopholes. I do the 1040 really EZ - how much did you make? Send it in.


11 posted on 03/25/2009 12:13:46 PM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
"Tax Simplification" - translation courtesy of my Obama/English dictionary:

"elimination of as many deductions, exemptions, credits, offsets, and depreciation allowances as we can get away with".

12 posted on 03/25/2009 12:13:58 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; Taxman; Principled; EternalVigilance; phil_will1; kevkrom; Bigun; PeteB570; FBD; ...
There has been legislation before Congress since 1999 that will eliminate loopholes, reduce tax evasion, eliminate corporate welfare and abolish the IRS. The legislation is The Fair Tax Act(HR25/S296). Fair Tax ping!


13 posted on 03/25/2009 12:15:25 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Tea Party Schedules
14 posted on 03/25/2009 12:16:16 PM PDT by TADSLOS ( Join the Conservative Revolution! http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Hold your wallets! The rats want to find many more ways to increase your taxes in relative obscure ways. The effective tax rate will be much higher than the 39.6% BHO talks about.


15 posted on 03/25/2009 12:16:56 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
recouping billions in lost revenue.

I continue to be amazed that they call taking our money away at the point of a gun or threat of jail, is called "recouping lost" money. The government does not make money. The government is not a business. It does not pay taxes. It TAKES people's money for people's work for someone else. The government takes from one and gives to low lifes and lazies. Too hell with the government. They can all rot in hell for all I care. STATES RIGHTS!!!

16 posted on 03/25/2009 12:18:12 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Destruction of the US Economy: Obama's Global War on Prosperity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Their simplification is to institute a 100% tax rate with no deductions for anything.


17 posted on 03/25/2009 12:19:15 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
hope of recouping billions in lost revenue

It was not your money in the first place. Translation: "hope of raising taxes by billions".

18 posted on 03/25/2009 12:21:06 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy

The beauty of the Fair Tax is that you pay it every time you spend money and it eliminates the dozens of hidden taxes that you pay through inflated prices.


19 posted on 03/25/2009 12:21:22 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Q: How much did your earn last year?
A: Send it in.


20 posted on 03/25/2009 12:24:00 PM PDT by PogySailor (We're so screwed.....welcome to the American Oligarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Quit worrying about the loopholes and go after the flagrant tax avoiders.

I would like to turn in a woman who hasn’t filed a tax return since about 1986. It would HAVE to be without a trace back to me.


21 posted on 03/25/2009 12:24:07 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Quit worrying about the loopholes and go after the flagrant tax avoiders.

I would like to turn in a woman who hasn’t filed a tax return since about 1986. It would HAVE to be without a trace back to me.


22 posted on 03/25/2009 12:25:30 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy
But, I wonder if the fair tax could start at say 10% and the corrupt and greedy government will vote to up it until it’s 50% - Who can trust the government anymore?

The Fair Tax will prevent Congress critters from raising the rate too high for two reasons.

1. The Fair Tax is transparent by showing the rate as a separate entry on the receipt. People will know immediately if Congress has raised the rate as opposed to the convoluted income tax code.

2. Tying tax collection to consumption will restore power to the people by giving them the freedom to choose how much and how often they are taxed. Raising the rate too high will result in people reducing their purchases. Fewer purchases will lessen the amount of tax collected forcing Congress to once again lower the rate. Congress can only maximize tax collection by keeping the tax rate within a reasonable boundary. This principle was brought forth by founding father and First Secretary Of The Treasury Alexander Hamilton in his Federalist Paper #21.
23 posted on 03/25/2009 12:26:10 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

You make a good point, and that is precisely why it is a lost cause.

Given that every politician in DC gets paid millions to dink with the tax code, why in heaven would they give that power up?

Note that the original US income tax WAS a flat tax.

Look where we are now.


24 posted on 03/25/2009 12:28:01 PM PDT by patton (If Hawai'i seccedes, is Barack Obama still an illegal alien?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

New Obama USSA Tax simplification:

1. All your money goes directly to us.
2. We will give you some back. Just don’t piss us off.
3. If you piss us off, you probably won’t get any back.
4. Remember paying higher taxes means you’re more patriotic. Thank you comrade!


25 posted on 03/25/2009 12:29:28 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Your facts are correct, your ideal is absurd.


26 posted on 03/25/2009 12:31:08 PM PDT by patton (If Hawai'i seccedes, is Barack Obama still an illegal alien?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: patton
Your facts are correct, your ideal is absurd.

Your statement is empty.
27 posted on 03/25/2009 12:31:59 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Ah yes, the old “Corporate Welfare” demagogue. Especially during a feeding frenzy over AIG employee bonuses.

But those executives and employee’s buy nice houses, lots and lots of new cars, $1,000 business suits, they eat at fancy restaurants, stay at expensive hotels, which all get heavily taxed locally up front, they pay maids, gardeners, clothes cleaners, and they employ lots of people that tend to their rich tastes. And if you can’t destroy them, you will surely envy them.

So by persecuting them and chasing them away because some Socialist elitist government and media went on their predictable campaign of hate for the upper class or the “Evil, Greedy, Rich” and if you bought into it, imagine an America without them.

That will soon happen, because they are being offered countless positions and new starts in other countries that see the value in what they do. And many have already made the choice to move. As have the companies they work for.

It’s the talk of all Wall Street executives these days; just what new country they would love to move to.


28 posted on 03/25/2009 12:33:33 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (WHAT? Where did my tag line go? (ACORN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Photobucket

The FAIRTAX is a far better solution.

It would have kept poor little Timmy here out of trouble and...

What? Say again?? Oh, you say that because he was well connected, HE didn't GET into trouble?

NEVER MIND!!


29 posted on 03/25/2009 12:33:47 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

See #24


30 posted on 03/25/2009 12:33:50 PM PDT by patton (If Hawai'i seccedes, is Barack Obama still an illegal alien?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

You can guarantee that any reformulation will be heavily tilted toward the non-producers and against high earners. This is all part of Obama’s scheme to implement a plan which is the fantasy of every liberal political science professor (redundancy noted).


31 posted on 03/25/2009 12:40:09 PM PDT by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton
See #24

Your thinking ignores one fundamental point. The people are the government and are therefore in charge. It also does not take into account the growing Fair Tax grassroots movement. In today's anti income tax environment the movement will only continue to grow.
32 posted on 03/25/2009 12:43:49 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Sure. Go with that.


33 posted on 03/25/2009 12:48:02 PM PDT by patton (If Hawai'i seccedes, is Barack Obama still an illegal alien?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: null and void

You forgot the 3rd line:

Balance Due:

CA....


34 posted on 03/25/2009 12:55:37 PM PDT by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've at last found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; Salamander; All
Having these guys work on the tax code is like going to Dr. Christian Szell for a toothache.

"Is the tax code safe? Is it safe?"
35 posted on 03/25/2009 12:59:12 PM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

“We need to take their code away....and make this so simple....that 3,000 IRS folks could run everything across the entire nation...and they’d only need a 8th grade education to read the tax code.”

What do you do with the 1 million accountants and tax lawyers?

Just askin....


36 posted on 03/25/2009 12:59:21 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Bow down to me. I am TOTUS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

And I don’t think he’s thinking of a Flat Tax!


37 posted on 03/25/2009 12:59:35 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

There’s an old joke in Chicago.

“What do you call 500 lawyers at the bottom of Lake Michigan?”

- “A good start.”


38 posted on 03/25/2009 1:01:12 PM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
The world sees how well Affirmative Banking worked for the US.

Now we'll get Affirmative Taxation.

Question #1 on new 1040 form:

Black & Disenfranchised? Yes____ NO ____

40 Acres & a Mule? Yes ____ No _____

If you answered yes then no, pls expect a tax credit equal to the amount your white neighbor has to pay.

39 posted on 03/25/2009 1:05:16 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

This is how the Commies will raise tax revenue without “raising taxes”.

Anyone ready to fight them yet?


40 posted on 03/25/2009 1:09:04 PM PDT by Boucheau ("...if destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher." Abe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

Exactly. Lefties and foreigners with lots of donation money will be exempt.


41 posted on 03/25/2009 1:14:26 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

notice the underlying assumption that it’s theirs to begin with and anything we keep is “lost revenue”?


42 posted on 03/25/2009 1:15:59 PM PDT by MrB (irreconcilable: One of two or more conflicting ideas or beliefs that cannot be brought into harmony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

They’ll avoid bringing race into the issue,

but there are lots of criteria that leave race out but end up with exactly the same people on the “giving” and “receiving” ends of taxation.


43 posted on 03/25/2009 1:17:39 PM PDT by MrB (irreconcilable: One of two or more conflicting ideas or beliefs that cannot be brought into harmony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: SonOfPyrodex

It would be nice, I have a monster tax bill this year.. however, I know that I can’t be effective, either for my family or the country, sitting in a jail cell.


45 posted on 03/25/2009 1:26:46 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: SonOfPyrodex
I am proactively going to hide my income, and move money offshore

Not exactly a good idea to telegraph your intentions.

47 posted on 03/25/2009 1:45:44 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SonOfPyrodex

There are lots of LEGAL ways to avoid instead of evade.
Most people don’t use them.

If they did, Congress/IRS would act to make them unavailable to us.


48 posted on 03/25/2009 1:46:07 PM PDT by MrB (irreconcilable: One of two or more conflicting ideas or beliefs that cannot be brought into harmony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: mnehring

My prediction is that the percentage of simplification will be inversely proportional to the percentage of lawyers on the “task force”.


50 posted on 03/25/2009 1:49:59 PM PDT by ssaftler (OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson