Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warren's 'backsliding' on homo marriage hurts church, Evangelical "pastor" apologizes on Larry King
onenewsnow.com ^ | 4/9/9 | Jim Brown

Posted on 04/09/2009 12:59:34 PM PDT by bimboeruption

A Washington, DC, pastor and outspoken opponent of same-sex "marriage" says California mega-church pastor Rick Warren has done "tremendous damage" by apologizing for his support last fall of California's marriage protection amendment.

Rick Warren said Monday on CNN's Larry King Live that he has "never been and never will be" an "anti-gay marriage activist," and made a point to inform the program's host that he apologized to his homosexual friends for comments he made in October to his church in support of Proposition 8 in California.

Bishop Harry Jackson, Jr., with the High Impact Leadership Coalition says he was very disappointed with Warren's statements on CNN.

"This man who's been called the next Billy Graham, who I really respect with all my heart and love what he's doing in Africa, is falling into a trap that is emblematic of the problem that the entire church is facing in this generation," Jackson states. "And that is that we love the applause of men more than we love the work of God and the gospel. Jesus...told us that we are to honor God first, and that we are not to fear men but we're to fear God."

Jackson argues that Warren was "aiding and abetting a deception around what kind of stance the Bible calls Christians to take" by telling Larry King that opposing the recent Iowa Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage was "not his agenda."

"He is the author of The Purpose Driven Life book," Jackson notes, "and therefore people are going to think, 'Well, this is not on my mission -- it's not on my purpose. I don't have to stand for truth.'

"Therefore, his defection -- in terms of his stance on this issue -- [and] his backsliding on this issue, becomes of tremendous damage to the strength of the church in this position."

Warren told King on Monday that he "never once even gave an endorsement" during the Prop. 8 campaign. However, in late October -- just weeks before the November 4 election -- the pastor told his congregation: "Now let me say this really clearly: we support Proposition 8 -- and if you believe what the Bible says about marriage, you need to support Proposition 8." (Read a complete transcript of those comments)

Pastor Warren has not yet responded to a request from OneNewsNow for an interview.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; pastor; proposition8; purposedrivensodomy; rickwarren; saddleback; samesexmarriage; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: bimboeruption

You know...I had a feeling about this guy. I watched him very closely during the debates. I knew something wasn’t right about him, but, I couldn’t put my finger on it.

If he still has a congregation, they might ought to start praying for his soul. Unfortunately, he has gone to the dark side.


41 posted on 04/09/2009 3:31:02 PM PDT by BlessingsofLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youturn

No — love and compassion and gentleness STARTED with Jesus 2,000 years ago. It’s not one bit wrong to be “touchy-feely” as you put it. God gives us all feelings for a deep purpose— to extend His love to others. When we use it to remain immature and undisciplined, it becomes something other than the way God intended for us.


42 posted on 04/09/2009 3:49:53 PM PDT by adopt4Christ (The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All
If you wanna see what kind of "worship" goes on at Warren's "church", check out this youtube video.

Comments please.

click here

43 posted on 04/09/2009 3:50:02 PM PDT by bimboeruption ((Clinging to my Bible and my HK.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Warren, Olsteen, Benny Hinn, Copeland, etc. etc.

There are quite a number of genuin mega church pastors however those above are at the top of the false prophet list as far as I’m concerned.

John Hagee is one of my favs.


44 posted on 04/09/2009 6:00:21 PM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Billy Graham's best political friend was LBJ according to an article done I think by TIME mag. And of course he was chief in covering over old bjclinton. It appears Warren is attempting to take the torch from the Grahams to become ‘cough cough’ America's presidential preacher adviser.

Do you remember one time all during the bash Bush years any of the super duper preachers coming down on the lying liberals? I sure do not, they half acted like they thought Rev. J Wright was on to an upcoming revelation.

I do not know if Warren has a donkey, but if he did, I would be expecting to be hearing from that donkey any day now.

I cannot begin to describe my surprise when I discovered during Clintons terms how many BGraham followers were also bjclinton voters supporters. Every week there was a poll announced giving the high popularity of old bill, and it was most disconcerting to hear from these ‘good’ Baptist churchgoers about how God says to ‘hate’ the sin but love the sinner.

I think that is why algore lost because he shunned bjclinton and so these clinton followers voted for President Bush or stayed home.

45 posted on 04/09/2009 6:11:48 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Bama and Company are reenacting the Pharaoh as told by Moses in Genesis!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; pissant
You can measure "touchy feely" by how they vote, evangelicals vote conservative, no religious group is less PC than evangelicals.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

46 posted on 04/09/2009 6:50:57 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
"Mainline" is simply another word for "Evangelical".

The term refers to the people who lived along the "main railroad line" leading into Philadelphia. At the time it was invented I don't believe Methodists were part of the "Mainline" either.

47 posted on 04/09/2009 7:13:00 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You can measure “touchy feely” by how they vote, evangelicals vote conservative, no religious group is less PC than evangelicals.

See post 46 it has a chart.


48 posted on 04/09/2009 7:22:54 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
"by their fruits, you shall know them."

I am an ordained SBC (conservative pastor), and Rick Warren has nothing important to say as far as I am concerned.

49 posted on 04/09/2009 7:27:00 PM PDT by evangmlw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
" cannot begin to describe my surprise when I discovered during Clintons terms how many BGraham followers were also bjclinton voters supporters. Every week there was a poll announced giving the high popularity of old bill, and it was most disconcerting to hear from these ‘good’ Baptist churchgoers about how God says to ‘hate’ the sin but love the sinner.

I think that is why algore lost because he shunned bjclinton and so these clinton followers voted for President Bush or stayed home."

============================================================

Well, you are full of cr*p.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

50 posted on 04/09/2009 7:31:45 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Thank you. Now where did you get your so called data from? I got mine first hand from the Graham/Warren church going followers. And I did hear for myself BGraham pulling the covers over old bj, claiming him to have the ‘charisma’ gift and would make one awesome preacher. Now you come and tell these people what you told me.
51 posted on 04/09/2009 7:36:29 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Bama and Company are reenacting the Pharaoh as told by Moses in Genesis!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"Mainline" is simply another word for "Evangelical".

I don't think so.
Mainline "churches" are much more liberal than Evangelical churches.

Click here for the definition of mainline

52 posted on 04/09/2009 7:37:46 PM PDT by bimboeruption ((Clinging to my Bible and my HK.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
Whether they are more or less liberal isn't the question. Mainline referred simply to Protestant churches along the "Main Line" leading out of Philadelpia back in the 1800s.

ALL Protestant churches are "Evangelical".

53 posted on 04/09/2009 7:42:31 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
And I did hear for myself BGraham pulling the covers over old bj, claiming him to have the ‘charisma’ gift and would make one awesome preacher. Now you come and tell these people what you told me

I know Brother Billy preached a mighty good sermon, but he really shocked me when he said that people can get to Heaven another way than through Christ.

Click here to see

He also shocked me when he told Barbara Walters in a 20/20 interview that he supported abortion in the cases of rape, incest and to save the life of the mother.

In "The Billy Graham Christian Worker's Handbook"(copyright 1997 edition), on page 19, he writes: "We should accept abortion in these cases: rape or incest or if the delivery of the child is a threat to a mother's life."

Click here to read

54 posted on 04/09/2009 8:05:37 PM PDT by bimboeruption ((Clinging to my Bible and my HK.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
ALL Protestant churches are "Evangelical".

What's your definition of "Evangelical"?

55 posted on 04/09/2009 8:07:38 PM PDT by bimboeruption ((Clinging to my Bible and my HK.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

“Thank you. Now where did you get your so called data from? I got mine first hand from the Graham/Warren church going followers. And I did hear for myself BGraham pulling the covers over old bj, claiming him to have the ‘charisma’ gift and would make one awesome preacher. Now you come and tell these people what you told me.”


You really are out there and your attacks on Billy Graham reveal where you are coming from.

The chart in post 50 is from CNN and it shows that from all protestants Clinton only got 41% of their vote, from white protestants he only got 36%. Protestants were the most anti-Clinton people in America.

This is a quote from Business Week “The religiousness differential in favor of the GOP peaked in 1992 and 1996 at 17 and 14 percentage points, when Democratic candidate Bill Clinton appeared to be highly secular (but still won).”


56 posted on 04/09/2009 8:13:08 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
Protestant, Reformed, Presbyterian, Reconstructionist, etc.

Every Christian body that's not Roman Catholic, nor Orthodox, nor Coptic, is "Evangelical".

French usage, where they fought the so-called "Religious Wars" of the 1500s, is to refer to all Protestant, etc. bodies as "Evangelical" ~ and I think they know what they're talking about.

It's only American news media who are unable to accept the fact that Protestantism is real and diverse.

Some confusion arose during the Thirty Years War when it was necessary to differentiate between the two Protestant factions, one of which was pretty much entirely Lutheran and the other Reformed.

We unfortunately have "some" who want the term "Evangelical" to be restricted to the Pentecostals ~

57 posted on 04/09/2009 8:14:50 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: evangmlw
"by their fruits, you shall know them."

I am an ordained SBC (conservative pastor), and Rick Warren has nothing important to say as far as I am concerned.

That's the ultimate test.

Although some misguided folks think that applying this test amounts to being judgmental.

58 posted on 04/09/2009 8:17:05 PM PDT by bimboeruption ((Clinging to my Bible and my HK.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
So who were all these that continuously polled in the affirmative for old bj during his terms. IT was Billy Graham that anointed Hillary on that come to Jesus stage in New York City. And these people that I personally know that are Graham/Warren followers are democrat voters first and some of them worked very hard to elect Clintons and then the Mrs. until Bama took the nomination. Then they worked very hard and voted in the majority for Bama.

I do not care what CNN claims, they have NO history of being on the ‘right’ side of truth since their inception.

The Grahams were very very very quiet regarding this past election, that is until after Bama won and then they took issue with his lack of being ‘pro-life’. Now it is represented that the majority of ‘religious’ voters are conservative, but my life's experience with the people I come in contact with says these people that spout the WWJD slogan believe very much in a ‘social’ justice Jesus.

59 posted on 04/09/2009 8:25:30 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Bama and Company are reenacting the Pharaoh as told by Moses in Genesis!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
So who were all these that continuously polled in the affirmative for old bj during his terms. They obviously were not the protestants, CNN didn't claim those numbers, those are how those groups voted in the 1996 election. Protestants were the most anti-Clinton group.
60 posted on 04/09/2009 8:38:25 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson