Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. May Convert Banks' Bailouts to Equity Share
NYT ^ | EDMUND L. ANDREWS

Posted on 04/19/2009 6:56:03 PM PDT by zaphod3000

WASHINGTON — President Obama’s top economic advisers have determined that they can shore up the nation’s banking system without having to ask Congress for more money any time soon, according to administration officials.

In a significant shift, White House and Treasury Department officials now say they can stretch what is left of the $700 billion financial bailout fund further than they had expected a few months ago, simply by converting the government’s existing loans to the nation’s 19 biggest banks into common stock.

Converting those loans to common shares would turn the government aid into available capital for a bank — and give the government a large equity stake in return.

While the option appears to be a quick and easy way to avoid a confrontation with Congressional leaders who are wary of putting more money into the banks, some critics would consider it a back door to nationalization, since the government could become the largest shareholder in several banks.

SNIP

The change to common stock would not require the government to contribute any additional cash, but it could increase the capital of big banks by more than $100 billion.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailout; bankbailout; nationalization; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2009 6:56:03 PM PDT by zaphod3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

Raise your hand if you DIDN’T see this coming.


2 posted on 04/19/2009 7:00:17 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000
Yep
Buy the Banks

That's the Ticket

More Creerie Newz

3 posted on 04/19/2009 7:00:29 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

Here it comes Folks! Socialism 101, it’s a Pass/fail course. Freshman year non honors course.


4 posted on 04/19/2009 7:01:47 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

They can force the banks to issue more common stock - to be issued only to a specific party ?


5 posted on 04/19/2009 7:06:24 PM PDT by stylin19a (Obama - the ethically waivered administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

The day my bank is owned by Tim Geithner & Co. is the day I close my account and put it into one of the many small Texas banks that did not get any TARP funds. I refuse to do financial business with a Leftist government.


6 posted on 04/19/2009 7:06:27 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

That’s a sure way for the banking system to collapse. Who trusts the government when they can break an agreement at any time? If I’m an investor in one of these banks, I’d pull my money out tomorrow.


7 posted on 04/19/2009 7:07:06 PM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: acapesket
Ried and Pelosi as voting shareholders?

Insanity.

8 posted on 04/19/2009 7:08:16 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

At some point those socialists will use their “equity position” as a mechanism to stop the mortgage interest deduction.


9 posted on 04/19/2009 7:08:53 PM PDT by G Larry (Obama's plan = "STEALING FROM THOSE WHO CREATE THE JOBS!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000
...some critics would consider it a back door to nationalization, since the government could become the largest shareholder in several banks.

EXACTLY!
10 posted on 04/19/2009 7:16:52 PM PDT by callisto (It's the three T's, stupid: Too Many Taxes, Trillions in Debt, and Transparency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

Paging Dick Armey. This is as Unconstitutional as anything done since our nation was founded.


11 posted on 04/19/2009 7:19:21 PM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Preferred shares are convertible into common shares at a set price. This is common financial transaction, except usually the government is not involved. ;)


12 posted on 04/19/2009 7:19:51 PM PDT by zaphod3000 (Free markets, free minds, free lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000
This ones going a long way down



13 posted on 04/19/2009 7:21:18 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

Horrifying. Of course, for now, this is just another one of Geithner’s infamous “trial balloons”, to gauge market reaction.


14 posted on 04/19/2009 7:25:01 PM PDT by FreepShop1 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

15 posted on 04/19/2009 7:28:14 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge
And More Cheerie Newz

16 posted on 04/19/2009 7:34:29 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Who Is John Galt?

Many saw this coming decades ago.


17 posted on 04/19/2009 7:38:34 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Because I am against Abortion - The DNC Controlled Fed Says I am terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

“In a significant shift”...

Significant shift? Who see’s this as a shift? This has been the direction all along.

The useless idiots in the MSM are working hard to spin Maobama’s Marxist ways.


18 posted on 04/19/2009 7:40:17 PM PDT by armyofprinciples (I dressed as 0bama for Halloween. I disguised myself as a Christian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

I don’t understand this graph. Could you give a simple explanation?
Much appreciation.


19 posted on 04/19/2009 7:43:56 PM PDT by WestwardHo (Whom the god would destroy, they first drive mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WestwardHo
Adjusted Monetary Base

The total amount of a currency that is either circulated in the hands of the public or in the commercial bank deposits held in the central bank's reserves. This measure of the money supply typically only includes the most liquid currencies.

Another Link http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/BASE_Max_630_378.png


20 posted on 04/19/2009 7:50:34 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson