Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Card Check Is Dead - Some Democrats only care about labor's money. (Barf alert!)
Wall Street Journal ^ | APRIL 22, 2009 | THOMAS FRANK

Posted on 04/22/2009 1:56:19 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Dustoff45

Thanks for your tale of woes with the union.


21 posted on 04/22/2009 2:58:26 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Since when is the secret ballot a basic tenet of democracy?”
March 18, 2009, 6:58 am
By Kevin “Coach” Collins
http://collinsreport.net

The tide might be turning in our favor. We have stopped Card Check!

On the same day Card Check failed, James Hoffa, president of the perpetually scandal ridden Teamsters Union, was so sure it would sail through and become law, he smugly asked, “Since when is the secret ballot a basic tenet of democracy?”

We answered this thug’s snarky question loud and clear, “Since July 4, 1776 Mister Hoffa.”

Last week America won a major victory in our battle against Obama’s socialism. By keeping up the pressure we beat Card Check. Whether the pimps in the media want to credit us or not: WE WON.

When Card Check was introduced last Tuesday it failed and it was quickly hidden away in both Congressional and Senate committees.
Big labor ordered its Democrat footstools to ram through a new procedure for unionizing currently non-union businesses. Called the Employee free Choice Act, but commonly called “Card Check” this scheme would have allowed unions to use open non secret ballots to intimidate workers into voting to unionize their workplace.

So far the Marxist Democrats have had things their way, but our push back is getting some traction.

The number of cosponsors for Card Check tells the story. Although 220 in the House and 39 in the Senate are impressive numbers, in this instance they were the same as a final vote tally for this scheme. The cosponsors represented only those prepared to vote yes. The other Democrats were saying they were afraid to support it. We did that! Ordinarily EVERY Democrat should have jumped to become a co-sponsor, but they didn’t. You and I scared them.

The Democrats now have good reason to be scared. Rasmussen’s new congressional generic poll has the GOP up over Democrats for the first time in a long time.

We may be seeing the start of a turn around faster than anyone could have predicted.

Don’t let up. Please help our special election candidates Jim Tedisco in the New York 20th http://www.jimtedisco.com/ and Rosanna Pulido in the 5th Ill. http://www.rosannapulido2009.com/


22 posted on 04/22/2009 3:18:59 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
...nurses tried to form a union but failed after they were reportedly threatened with losing their benefits among other things. Such practices are commonplace and well-documented by Human Rights Watch

Being represented by a union is a human right?

I supposed getting a nurse to scratch my ass is a human right too?

23 posted on 04/22/2009 4:19:19 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Sprechen sie Austrian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Why does labor always get it in the neck?

Why don't we ask what's left of GM. What an idiot.

24 posted on 04/22/2009 5:28:42 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor
The rats will likely have a filibuster proof majority.

Are you sure about that? I haven't looked at a state by stat breakdown, but parties with big majority, by definition, have more seats to defend. And they don't have GWB to kick around any more.

25 posted on 04/22/2009 5:32:14 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dustoff45

Once, in the office of a railroad I contracted for, a union guy showed up with a phone in his hand he had been directed to hook up. He asked where it was supposed to go. We pointed to a desk where a new employee sat. It turned out that the desk was positioned against the wall so he couldn’t reach the jack. He informed us as much and started to walk away with the new phone, saying it wasn’t his job to move desks. We offered to do it for him but he would have none of it. A day or two later another guy showed up and spend about 5 seconds dragging the desk a few feet from the wall. A few days after that the original guy showed up and plugged in the phone. After that the employee who’s desk it was, pushed the desk back against the wall. A few days later, you guessed it, union guy number two showed up to push the desk back against the wall. And of course expressed dissatisfaction that the job had been done by non union labor.


26 posted on 04/22/2009 5:40:34 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ken5050; neverdem
...why on God’s green earth is the WSJ printing this crapola?

Because it is just as important to know what/how a opposition thinks/plans as it is to train your own troops.

It's called "opposition research" and keeps you from getting blindsided.
27 posted on 04/22/2009 7:37:26 PM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Minn

There are many Republican retirements so I am not optimistic. If the economy continues to decline, the rats will have a problem. I suspect there may be a small rebound before another dive occurs however.


28 posted on 04/22/2009 8:26:39 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Minn
Don't you just love it.

Look for the Union label, means it will cost more, take longer to finish, and be a pain in the process


29 posted on 04/22/2009 8:53:26 PM PDT by Dustoff45 (A non-posting Freeper makes no spelling errors (Have a Misspell on me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
A pro-unionization op-ed from the WSJ. Thanks neverdem.
Good old K Street, where the big tea party never stopped, has all but halted organized labor's effort to make it easier for workers to unionize. After massive lobbying both by labor and by business, it appears that the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which, as it now stands, would allow workers to organize in many cases merely by signing cards instead of holding elections, will not have the 60 votes required to get past a Republican filibuster in the Senate. Now, to be pro-labor is to resign yourself to years of failures and defeats, with few tea parties along the way for consolation. Even so, the setback on EFCA has to be a bitter one. Union members worked hard to elect Barack Obama and the Democratic Congress, as they did to put Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton in the White House. And now, just as in those previous two periods of Democratic governance, labor's friends are having trouble enacting basic labor-law reforms.

30 posted on 04/23/2009 6:29:18 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
...labor's friends are having trouble enacting basic labor-law reforms.

Reforms? Reforms!!!???

Eliminating the secret ballot is a reform?

31 posted on 04/23/2009 6:37:13 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAItNSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Sure, the same way that having ACORN fill out all the “absentee” ballots in close races is a reform.


32 posted on 04/23/2009 7:01:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson