Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Ignoring things we know" is the only way Dems can advance their agenda.
1 posted on 04/27/2009 5:52:55 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

One word: capacitors.


2 posted on 04/27/2009 5:55:07 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (John Galt was exiled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

They have not ‘captured’ the ‘public’s’ support — they are being crammed down our throats by a few folks who pretend to believe in them, for their own purposes.


5 posted on 04/27/2009 5:57:54 AM PDT by bboop (obama, little o, not a Real God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ...
Jason Lewis, substitute host for El Rushbo, August 11, 2008 on the E.I.B Network:

"The federal government has to subsidize windmill production through production tax credits of about 1.8¢ per kilowatt. Wind Farms also receive an accelerated depreciation. Wind farms are also land intensive. They produce a fraction of the energy of a traditional power plant but they require 100 times the acreage.

From the National Center for Policy Analysis: to produce a 1000 megawatt power plant a wind farm would require 192,000 acres or 300 square miles. A nuclear plant would need about 1700 acres (or 2.65 mi2), and about 3 mi2 for a coal fired power plant. The transmission lines for the wind turbines would be massive, 12,000 miles just for the array."

 

 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

6 posted on 04/27/2009 5:58:46 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." - Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
solar and wind energy seem to have captured the public's support as potentially being the primary or total answer to our electric power needs.

Because many of the public still believe in the tooth fairy.

ML/NJ

7 posted on 04/27/2009 5:59:26 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Wind Industrial sites are ugly and ruin the outdoors. Would the left allow this at ANWAR?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

9 posted on 04/27/2009 6:00:08 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The only power they really care about is political. This is just an ends to that means.

Pray for America


10 posted on 04/27/2009 6:05:37 AM PDT by bray (Throw the Crooks Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Even this article doesn't “Get Real” with the issue of Solar Energy. Solar Energy isn't “Clean”. Sunshine is clean.
Solar Energy take toxic materials to create electricity and it takes toxic materials to store the electricity. Do a search on “Deep Cycle Batteries”, the kind used for solar power. You’ll find out that they only last about as long as your car battery. 60 months and cost anywheres from $500 - $1000 a pop and you'll need about 10 of them.
Who's gonna recycle all of the lead and sulfuric acid. Solar panels have a life span as well and they also will need to be reclaimed to prevent they're toxic materials from entering the “Environment”. Who's eating that cost?
11 posted on 04/27/2009 6:05:40 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Statists have always and will always “ignore what we know”. They’re statists.


12 posted on 04/27/2009 6:09:11 AM PDT by ryan71 (Time to buy guns and ammo, People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Imagine.

In fifty years we could be discussing whether to allow lead mining in ANWR.


13 posted on 04/27/2009 6:10:14 AM PDT by cookcounty (Late-term abortion advocate Barack Obama preaching about torture. How stupid can you get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Damn the law of physics. It is all about feeling good for liberals, physics be damned.


16 posted on 04/27/2009 6:15:49 AM PDT by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I am so glad to see you post this article. Only 2 wks ago, we had 2 men come to our property to discuss adding wind and solar to a home we wish to build and found we DID NOT need to be on the grid and could heat with wood/propane logs...and not even need a heat pump! No more electric or water bill as we’ll have well and septic, so we’ve made up our minds that spending 15-20K and be totally self-reliant is best way to go (besides, we’ll be nearly a mile off hard top road).

Even using a small unit that goes on top of your own home will help with your light bills. I am so looking forward to getting out of town and being in the woods away from the crazy folks...other than my husband and I ;>)


17 posted on 04/27/2009 6:18:55 AM PDT by sevinufnine (Sevin - "If we do not fight when we know we can win, we'll have to fight when we know we will lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Solar needs to be at an efficiency of at least 70-80% to become cost effective.... recently they broke 10%.


18 posted on 04/27/2009 6:20:21 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Has anyone considered that wind generation “farms”, remove energy from the the natural wind flow currents, hence wind mills alter the local wind flow, and as such could/will change the local climate....


19 posted on 04/27/2009 6:21:16 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Enough of this silliness with wind and solar power! It's time for Joseph Newman.

The Story of Joseph Newman

23 posted on 04/27/2009 6:47:31 AM PDT by Paco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1; newgeezer

Yet wind power is very popular and here in Iowa we will produce over 10 percent of our power from wind. WHY NOT use wind power while the wind is blowing and back fill with other sources when it is not?


33 posted on 04/27/2009 7:29:03 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (I can reach across the aisle without even using my sights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Here's a great resource for information at windaction.org.

I went with some friends to the Fond Du Lac area of Wisconsin and we saw all the turbines (400 feet tall) marring the farmland. What used to be a view of beautiful, rolling hills was now a stack of noisy, industrial pinwheels, with blinking red lights.

And when the wind doesn't blow, they don't turn, unless they are assisted by electricity. So they're using power to make power and then not generating enough power to do much of anything useful. Would any of you want your hospital or your home running on wind power 24/7?

46 posted on 04/30/2009 4:32:47 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson