Posted on 04/28/2009 8:49:37 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Parents are being purposely excluded from multisexual issues in schools, as seen in mounting evidence from California school districts, the National Educational Association, and more.
Students discuss different kinds of families, including kids raised by a mom and dad, grandparents, and same-sex parents. In all age groups, the multisexual message is being woven into everyday instruction.
“This is a mainstream effort to force parents out of the classroom. If it’s not this way in your school, it is only a matter of time before your school is confronted with efforts to exclude parents,” said Karen England, Executive Director of Capitol Resource Institute.
State law now mandates that schools provide special accommodations for homosexual, bisexual, and transsexual behaviors. San Francisco Unified School District explicitly interprets state law to mean that it does not need to notify parents about multisexual curriculum and activities.
In a website launched just this month, SFUSD wrote, “As long as human sexuality is not the focus of the discussion, parent notification is not required.” It claims a right to teach about same-sex romantic attraction, same-sex parenting, and much more—starting in kindergarten.
“California leads the nation, and on this issue, San Francisco is leading California. Other school districts and influential organizations are pushing to follow the same path,” England said.
“Do you want San Francisco school policies coming to your school district next?” she said.
The NEA issued standards for multisexual issues several years ago, which instruct school employees to “respect confidentiality.” “This includes not telling other colleagues or a student’s parents or guardians that someone has ‘come out’ to you without a specific reason,” it said.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
I agree with you. Little kids don’t need this bs. I think the school shouldn’t decide when to teach about sex, gay or regular. I know way back when I had sex ed classes we just laughed quite a bit & made the teacher uncomfortable. That was in high school & most kids were well aware of sex by then. I do remember some stupid movie in 6th grade about periods. It was really dumb & we didn’t want to see it. The boys made fun of the girls for awhile, they knew what it was all about. I don’t like the idea of anyone telling Sassy about sex but her father or me. He is more or less going to let me handle it.
Our youngest, in 5th grade, is in Family Life now so it’s a daily topic. Same thing happened with the other 3. I don’t mind and it’s Catholic school so they’re teaching it in religion class, according to dogma/doctrine of the Catholic Church. But again, not really necessary as we talk about it at home. They used to have a film and more detailed sex ed in 7th grade but too many parents complained so they stopped it a couple years ago. Back when I was in school, we viewed the abortion movie. I wish I could find it to show my kids. It was horrific and shocking and heartbreaking as it showed abortion at various stages. It had a tremendous impact on me as a teen. Solidified my view on abortion back when I was 14.
Yeah, I do most of the icky stuff too with the kids but it’s great having his take on it, for them. Then again, I’m always telling him to cool it cos he’s all about how bad boys are and all they think about is sex.
The funniest thing was when the oldest had a boyfriend. I seriously thought he was gonna have a stroke and had to remind him how nice my Dad was to him. But of course that was different cos it was him.
Here too. I am forever telling Joe that when she is older Sassy can wear light make up & date. She is already scared boys won't like her because of her daddy's looks & attitude.
Family Life class sounds ok to me. Sex Ed just didn't do much for me way back when. I skipped it most of the time because it was embarrassing to see what the boys did to the teacher. She wasn't in control of the class, it was more of a joke.
sodom and gomorrah
Reason 1,659,327 why my kids are in a private Christian school. My Kindergartner is learning about the Bible and Jesus and God not this politically correct garbage.
The North American Man/Boy Love Association (homosexual pedophiles) actually sent an envoy to the U.N. to lower the age of sexual consent to 10. The U.N. was actually paying attention until they found out American pedophiles sponsored it.
They homosexuals want the kids. The younger they are, the easier they are to indoctrinate. They can't have sex with their own children, so they're stealing everyone elses.
More ammo for my argument that no one is really born a homosexual. They are created, cultivated, and celebrated, while normal kids are “haters”.
If deviant sexual desire is normal, why does it have to be taught? Schools are teaching deviancy to create more deviants.
These are NOT “your” schools, and you will NOT be able to “save” them.
They are tax-funded, union-run, Maoist indoctrination centers.
They are the bus ministry of the State Church of Secular Humanism.
The best thing you can do about the “public” school is to take your children OUT of them and either educate your own children yourself, or put them in a church or synagogue school.
It is stuff like this that is causing the Muslim world to fight us. They don’t want this poisoning their culture.
> Good. I’ll look forward to you voting for vouchers next
> time they’re on your ballot.
If you take their money, you will have to do what they say.
Better yet, people who educate their own children, be it home school or a private school, should not have to pay *ANY* school tax. Ever.
You need to take the money away from the school collective at its source - the tax trough.
LIBERALS BELIEVE CHILDREN ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE STATE
http://www.grasstopsusa.com/110605.html
Is this the decision you were referencing?
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
When the next big terror attack occurs... and it will... I’m seriously OK with SF taking it. Hopefully ground zero will be the Castro.
That's just the point. They're NOT thinking. If the queers want to teach this depraved lifestyle, why don't they open their own schools, teach all that crap to “their own kind”, and leave ther rest of us NORMAL people ALONE. They'd have what they want and we'd get what we want.
But “they” don't want to do that. “They” want to screw up something that's worked for decades and drag it down to “their” gutter level. What is the national percentage of those freaks, 2%-5% in the overall population? To me, there is an apartheid in this country. The minority telling the majority what will happen. There were protests worldwide about a different type of apartheid in South Africa. All things being equal, that's what we've got here in this case. It is wrong and NEEDS TO BE STOPPED!
Parents can demand all they want. If a school wants to indoctrinate kids with this stuff, they have the right to do so, according to the MA courts and the Ninth District Court at least. Parents have no rights whatsoever. They just shut up and pay the bill.
What they can do, however, is what you did, pull the kids out and either homeschool or send them to a parent-directed private school that can be trusted
If enough parents do that, I bet public schools will show a renewed interest regarding parents’ wishes in the matter. These creeps have to eat too.
I have got a few definitions of those three terms but most are unprintable here. Deviants and perverts will suffice.
Well D'uh. Recruiting!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.