Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WOMAN GETS 30 DAYS IN JAIL FOR TEXTING IN COURT ( ANOTHER BLACKROBED AROGANT AUTOCRAT )
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 28, 2009 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 04/29/2009 1:32:14 AM PDT by Robert Drobot

A Utah mother of four small children has been jailed on a judge's order that she serve 30 days behind bars for allegedly sending a text message while she was watching a court proceeding....According to Jackson's report the incident happened....about a month ago, but his daughter-in-law was summoned to court only yesterday and ordered immediately to jail....Susan Henwood allegedly sent a text message, an action that didn't affect the hearing, its participants, or the judge, but later was reported to him by a member of the court staff, according to Jackson.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: abuseofauthority; fascism; idiot; judge; malicious; notbreaking; notbreakingnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Robert Drobot
I'm with the judge on this one. If it were me, I'd suspend all but 3 days in the pokey. Or maybe commute it to 80 hours community service. Wearing an orange vest and doing some work outside.

But I agree with his decision to enforce the rules of his court. Its disrespectful to the court.
21 posted on 04/29/2009 3:25:47 AM PDT by Tainan (Where's my FOF Indicator?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Are you allowed to take notes on a PDA? Is it the typing that’s an offense or the transmitting?


22 posted on 04/29/2009 3:28:18 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

Obviously the judge agreed with us...lol. I do have a right to a sound-free environment in a court room....what a stupid thing to say. Do you actually read what you write???


23 posted on 04/29/2009 3:40:43 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
Some FReepers are a little old fashioned. They hate cars because they scare their horses.

What's funny is these are probably the SAME freepers (the ones complaining about people texting) that go bonkers when the government tries to take away their right to smoke at a restaurant.

You want your sound-free environment? You dark theater? I want my smoke free environment. You can't have it both ways.

24 posted on 04/29/2009 3:41:09 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: packrat35
Seems to me that there is such a thing a decorum in court.

It also seems to me that there is such a thing as "texting" in every court - after all, what else is the court stenographer actually doing? If nothing in the hearing was classified, and if the judge didn't know about the incident until he was told, it looks like "no harm, no foul" would have been the correct (non) call.


25 posted on 04/29/2009 3:49:16 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Judges and their court officers go nuts when they hear a cell phone ring during the calendar call and daily proceedings.

Some thick-headed lawyers are arrogant enough to not even turn off their phones, though most do.

Still, I’ve never seen anyone incarcerated for it. They usually get yelled at and ordered to leave the courtroom.


26 posted on 04/29/2009 3:52:48 AM PDT by Canedawg (Support and defend the Constitution, and fight back against the Idiocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packrat35
Limited pity here. No one should be using a phone for anything while in court.

Or church.

27 posted on 04/29/2009 3:53:28 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

All phones and pagers will be turned off during the proceedings, is a common instruction given to those entering a courtroom. I suspect there’s more to this story than we’re being told.


28 posted on 04/29/2009 4:01:31 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

If your phone makes noise when you are texting, you need to reset your preferences or get a better phone.


29 posted on 04/29/2009 4:02:09 AM PDT by muir_redwoods ( O.B.A.M.A. = One Big Asinine Mistake, America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

“But I agree with his decision to enforce the rules of his court. Its disrespectful to the court.”

Thirty days imprisonment for writing on an electronic device is disrespectful to mankind...disrespect for this arrogant tyrants court is patriotic.


30 posted on 04/29/2009 4:06:25 AM PDT by Wpin (I do not regret my admiration for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Did you actually read what the judge said?

“She was summoned to court where Henriod ordered her immediately to jail for 30 days, responding to a request for bail with the condition that would be allowed only if her husband paid a $70,000 judgment stemming from the civil dispute, Jackson reported.”

He would give bail only if they agreed to pay a judgment. Anyone else pulled this and it would be called extortion.


31 posted on 04/29/2009 4:17:15 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: packrat35
Whoa, wait a minute! This woman is a mother with 4 small children at home. This crime certainly does not necessitate this punishment, this abuse of judicial power. A monetary fine would be appropriate here as such, maybe $15?
32 posted on 04/29/2009 4:33:26 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

There are very clear signs in court rooms.

My brother is a lawyer and he will not even take his phone in the court room. He witnessed a lawyer get a hefty fine and tongue lashing for having an single beep call alert be heard by a judge.

But, 30 days? That is heavy handed unless she got uppity at the hearing.


33 posted on 04/29/2009 4:41:25 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

I agree. People convicted of DUI and shoplifting usually receive less jail time and cause FAR more harm to society. The most the woman should have received is a small fine. The Judge is acting as a tyrant.


34 posted on 04/29/2009 4:47:47 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
If one were texting potential or coming witnesses, this would be a problem.

Any lawyers out there to verify?

35 posted on 04/29/2009 5:04:34 AM PDT by wolfcreek ("unnamed "right-wing extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Sadly, society is hopelessly ADDICTED to their tech toys.


36 posted on 04/29/2009 5:05:50 AM PDT by wolfcreek ("unnamed "right-wing extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

And they expect us to respect courts and the justice system? BS. I hold the entire justice/Law enforcement system in contempt.


37 posted on 04/29/2009 5:12:40 AM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pas
“She was summoned to court where Henriod ordered her immediately to jail for 30 days, responding to a request for bail with the condition that would be allowed only if her husband paid a $70,000 judgment stemming from the civil dispute, Jackson reported.”

He would give bail only if they agreed to pay a judgment.

He should exchange places with the woman immediately

38 posted on 04/29/2009 5:13:45 AM PDT by daku
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Obviously the judge agreed with us...lol. I do have a right to a sound-free environment in a court room....what a stupid thing to say. Do you actually read what you write???

Considering the who the judge is, agreeing with him doesn't put you in good company. And YOU don't have a right to a sound-free environment in a courtroom because YOU have no power to make everyone else shut up. It's the judges call, not yours. And my comment was based on your comment which went well beyond the courtroom. Maybe you should go back and read your own post.

Should have been six months. I am sick and tired of cell phones being EVERYWHERE. You can’t go anywhere without hearing a conversation from people yapping on the phone and the texting is insane. You can hear those keys going a mile a minute and don’t get me started on the driving while texting....

You were complaining about cell phones being EVERYWHERE, not just court. You must be one of those "if I don't want one, you can't have one" types.

39 posted on 04/29/2009 5:14:20 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I am an extremist that was created by Butch Napolitano.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

You must be one of those “if I don’t want one, you can’t have one” types.

Not at all. I have 2 cell phones. One for work and one personal, but I am courteous and don’t use it in the stores or while driving. I would not even dream of using it in a courtroom. I don’t know why you are upset over my post. I did a rant that every FREEPER does from time to time and maybe it was over the top but it was still just a rant.


40 posted on 04/29/2009 5:18:03 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson