Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal bias isn't killing newspapers
Boston Globe ^ | May 6, 2009 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 05/06/2009 1:35:39 AM PDT by MartinaMisc

'I SURE HOPE you'll be out of a job soon," e-mails a friend, alluding to The Boston Globe's current excruciations. He really is a friend - he has shown me and my family much warmth and kindness over the years - and should I find myself without a job, I'm sure he would want to help in any way he could. But such is his antipathy to the Globe that he regards my potential unemployment as a price well worth paying for what he calls the "greater good" of the newspaper's demise.

My friend is a conservative, and he is not alone in his views. To many on the right, the increasingly dire straits in which newspapers find themselves are something to cheer, or at any rate nothing to regret. The industry, they believe, is merely reaping in falling revenues and fleeing subscribers what it sowed in left-wing bias and unbalanced news coverage.

"Good riddance to bad trash," crows one conservative blogger, linking gleefully to Warren Buffett's forecast of "nearly unending losses" for US newspapers. "Good Riddance" is likewise James Srodes's message in the American Spectator, where he begins a column by "letting loose a small raspberry at the flood of hand-wringing going on over The Decline of the American Daily Newspaper." His disdain is echoed by readers, one of whom snorts: "Their pages are full of liberal tripe, lies about science and misbegotten theories of life. It's a wonder they sell any papers at all."

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bostonglobe; globe; jeffjacoby; layoffs; liberalmedia; newspapers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: South40
It's exactly the reason why I canceled the subscription to mine.

+1

We used to get the Sunday WaPo plus the local rag. The WaPo just got too ridiculous, so we cancelled it. The local isn't all that bad and I need to know who died and that sort of thing.

I wonder if some of the online traffic is clicks from sites like FR (not that there ARE any other sites like this, but you know what I mean.) I have even gone to the Noo Yawk Slimes when an there was a link to a relevant article, but I wouldn't subscribe to the Slimes.....

21 posted on 05/06/2009 3:38:17 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ALPAPilot

3. Crappy reporting and writing. Many articles would earn less than a B for an eighth grader.
**********************************************************
That does it for me ... poor quality writing with no effort put forth to understand the subject...

When was the last time you read an article on a subject that you had great knowledge of and you came away thinking .. this writer gets it rather than “he’s clueless”.


22 posted on 05/06/2009 3:40:21 AM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc
Naw. We all know how HONEST liberals and liberal media is. We all believe them. It is the papers just are so out of date, not touch pad easy. Sure, has nothing to do with liberal, leftist, communist, socialist, homofag, appeasement. Naw, nothing like that.
23 posted on 05/06/2009 3:45:09 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Right wing military retiree. Proudly on DHLS hit list!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc
The reason Internet news does better is because it's easier for us to to avoid the huge steaming plies of leftism than with a print version. All we need to look at is an article's title and know we want nothing to do with that spew. Liberals think they somehow have a right to force us to read their views and are put out when we don't care to see it.
24 posted on 05/06/2009 3:49:10 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc
My local paper had an article regarding how to have great garage sale. First suggestion: Post it on Craiglist ! Lol!

Today's paper arrived soaking wet. Hopefully the replacement arrives before the wife wakes up.

25 posted on 05/06/2009 3:58:49 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonspirit

If you wish to believe the rigged polls ( I do not ) the nation is split about 50-50, dem and pub...to produce a product that automatically alienates 50% of your potential customers is suicide...to not see this is a sign of mental illness


26 posted on 05/06/2009 4:21:38 AM PDT by joe fonebone (When you ask God for help, sometimes he sends the Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
According to polling, the public is about half Dem and half Pub, but my guess is that a lot of the Dem half never reads a paper. They get their news from the Jon Stewarts and David Lettermans of the entertainment industry.
I am one conservative who has canceled subscriptions to the NYT and the Atlantic and Newsweek and our local paper for their over the top liberal bias. We already have a lot of empirical evidence here on the FR to counter Jacoby’s claim that liberal bias had nothing to do with the demise of the newspaper.
27 posted on 05/06/2009 4:36:51 AM PDT by madinmadtown (It is good to be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc
Given a choice, I would rather sit at the kitchen table with my family, reading the newspaper than sitting alone reading electronic print on a computer.

Reason why I don't subscribe to the daily fish-wrap is the spiking of important stories in order to cover up a member(s) of certain protected classes (Be it race or politician), MSM trying to shape their own perception into reality, AP bias, and covering up of authoritarian officials (Mostly dems) who our deemed “worthy” by press officials.

There is a nice sense of intimacy reading the paper with others, having conversations around the table about certain events, and going off to work/play that a computer screen/desk cannot duplicate. Laptops can be a pain to clean when the occasional coffee/OJ spill occurs.

28 posted on 05/06/2009 4:44:18 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

>>>> It’s exactly the reason why I canceled the subscription to mine. <<<<<<

Most city newspapers are so far left that it’s like some kind of alternate reality.


29 posted on 05/06/2009 4:49:25 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc

Newspapers are failing because Craig’s List has taken their only major source of income and skimmed the best of the classified ads from the newspapers. The revenue model no longer supports all of the infrastructure and costs of running a newspaper.


30 posted on 05/06/2009 4:50:17 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc
Didn't see any reference to the BG union's demand for continuation of “guaranteed jobs for life”. That's gotta have a major impact on the bottom line.
31 posted on 05/06/2009 4:58:57 AM PDT by pappyone (New to Freep, still working a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
It's exactly the reason why I canceled the subscription to mine

Ditto. Perhaps putting an anti-gun pompous ass in charge of a newspaper in East Tennessee is not the smartest marketing decision. May its death come quickly.

32 posted on 05/06/2009 5:14:10 AM PDT by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc
Liberal bias isn't killing newspapers is like a man on fire saying the fire isn't killing himself. Newspaper reporters and editors, about 90% of them, are ostriches.
33 posted on 05/06/2009 5:15:52 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

As someone who worked in the newspaper industry for more than 30 years (but no longer), I do think liberal bias is at least somewhat of a contributor to the decline in newspapers. But there is another element besides the loss of ad revenue caused by the Internet age.

It is liberal bias that has dominated our educational system for years, and therefore into journalism. Liberal bias has promoted a learning atmosphere transfixed on social engineering, in addition to our children leaving school systems with pretty poor learning skills. Many have little or no reading comprehension, are incurious and can’t think critically. Why would they pick up a newspaper to read?

My kids grew up with newspaper all over our house. News was discussed and argued about. Now in their 20s they check in with our local paper via the Internet, but only occasionally pick up a newspaper in the towns where they live. My bet is they are probably some of the few kids who bother at all with print media, aside from the free music/entertainment publications strewn around urban areas.

The incurious nature of our print media reflects the incurious nature of the educational system they have promoted for years.


34 posted on 05/06/2009 5:17:51 AM PDT by alreadythere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc

Liberal bias certainly is one factor ... and the reason I canceled my newspaper subscription.


35 posted on 05/06/2009 5:20:24 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc

Liberal bias is the reason we discontinued our subscription to the Atlanta newspaper. True, we had alternative news sources on the Internet, but years ago, we had an alternative news source on 24/7 news radio. This time, we just got sick of the increasingly blatant bias.

When we wrote our cancellation letter, we got repeated calls and emails from the paper offering us subscription deals. They simply refused to believe that we disliked their product because we found their viewpoint repulsive and offensive.


36 posted on 05/06/2009 5:28:50 AM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc

Keep whistling past the graveyard. Even your behemoth Goliath of lie-ber-al propaganda, the New York Times, will be chained and padlocked, foreclose notices plastered on it’s doors by the end of the year.


37 posted on 05/06/2009 5:38:02 AM PDT by DGHoodini (God's gonna getcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc
The author is exactly right. It is NOT the liberal bias that is causing the crisis in the newspaper industry.

It is simply under-regulated readership.

gitmo

38 posted on 05/06/2009 5:44:37 AM PDT by gitmo (History books will read that Lincoln freed the slaves and Obama enslaved the free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc

The author is partially correct, but fails to think out of the box. Its true that craigs list has reduced revenues and that the internet has reduced readership, however, newspapers continue to echo the rest of the drive by media in their leftist approach to all subjects. The average person gets a dose of liberalism in the movies, on entertainment television, in the broadcasts news. People are starved for a more conservative slant to the news. Imagine if the newspapers had switched course and provided this conservative view. It couldn’t have hurt.


39 posted on 05/06/2009 6:08:40 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc

>> “Liberal bias isn’t killing newspapers”

It’s definitely a contributing factor. Admitting the bias, however, is something newsworthy.


40 posted on 05/06/2009 6:19:33 AM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson